BEISSELL v. SHOLL, 4 U.S. 211 (1800)

Issues: Property Law, Riparian Rights, Water Rights

4 U.S. 211 (1800) U.S. Supreme Court Beissell ?v.?Sholl. 1 Wagoner v.?Same. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. March Term, 1800 CASE, for diverting a water course. The COURT left the facts to the jury, under this general statement of the law: ‘That every man, in this country, has an unquestionable right, to erect a mill upon […]

Read More

CHANCELLOR v. PHILLIPS, 4 U.S. 213 (1800)

4 U.S. 213 (1800) U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. September Term, 1800 THE following case was submitted for the opinion of the Court: On the 2d of June 1798, a levy was made by the sheriff on a kiln of unburnt bricks, and other property, by virtue of a fi. fa. for a […]

Read More

FREEMAN v. RUSTON, 4 U.S. 214 (1800)

4 U.S. 214 (1800) U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. September Term, 1800 VENDITIONI EXPONAS. A rule being obtained on the sheriff of Philadelphia county, to bring into Court, the money levied on this execution; another rule was, also, entered, to show cause why Samuel Coates should not receive out of the money, an […]

Read More

WEITZELL’S LESSEE v. FRY, 4 U.S. 218 (1800)

4 U.S. 218 (1800) U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. December Term, 1800 EJECTMENT for 306 acres of land in Northumberland county. The case was this: On the 13th of September 1774, John Read, being seised in fee, mortgaged the premises, mentioned in the declaration, to ‘The trustees of the general loan office of […]

Read More

MCLAUGHLIN’S LESSEE v. DAWSON, 4 U.S. 221 (1800)

4 U.S. 221 (1800) U.S. Supreme Court[^1] Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. December Term, 1800 EJECTMENT for 400 acres of land, lying north-west of the river Ohio. Both parties claimed under settlement rights. The defendant’s improvement commenced one day earlier than the plaintiff’s; but the plaintiff had the first warrant; and he had been constantly resident […]

Read More

POLLOCK v. HALL, 4 U.S. 222 (1800)

4 U.S. 222 (1800) U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. December Term, 1800 THESE causes were referred, on the 22d of January 1800, by agreement of the parties, and several meetings were held by the referees, at which the parties exhibited their respective proofs, and were heard by themselves or their agents. The plaintiff […]

Read More

MATHER v. PRATT, 4 U.S. 224 (1800)

4 U.S. 224 (1800) U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. December Term, 1800 THIS was an action brought by the plaintiff, as indorsee and holder of several promissory notes, drawn by Dorey and Bayhir, in favour of Joseph Mussi, against the defendants, to whom Dorey and Bayhir had assigned all their estate, in trust […]

Read More

O’HARRA v. HALL, 4 U.S. 340 (1800)

U.S. Supreme Court 4 U.S. 340 (1800) Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District. April Term, 1800 CASE. This was an action brought by the assignee of a bond, against the assignor, upon a written assignment, in general terms. On the trial, Ingersoll, for the plaintiff, offered parol testimony to show, that the defendant had expressly guaranteed the […]

Read More

U S v. COOPER, 4 U.S. 341 (1800).

U.S. Supreme Court 4 U.S. 341 (1800) The United States v. Cooper. Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District. April Term, 1800 THE defendant, being indicted for a libel on the President, applied to the Court, for a letter to be addressed by them, to several members of congress (congress being in session) requesting their attendance as witnesses, […]

Read More

EVANS v. BOLLEN, 4 U.S. 342 (1800)

U.S. Supreme Court 4 U.S. 342 (1800) Evans, qui tam, &c. v. Bollen. Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District. April Term, 1800 THIS was a qui tam action, in which the following declarawas filed: ‘October Session 1797. ‘In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Pennsylvania District of the Middle Circuit. ‘District of Pennsylvania, ss. […]

Read More

Hollingsworth v. Fry, 4 U.S. 345 (1800).

U.S. Supreme Court 4 U.S. 345 (1800) HOLLINGSWORTH v. FRY Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District. October Term, 1800 IN equity. The bill, after setting forth a variety of transactions between the parties, relative to a tract of land, mills, and mill race, in Dauphin county, states, that on the trial of a writ of partition for […]

Read More

Thurston v. Koch, 4 U.S. 348 (1800).

U.S. Supreme Court 4 U.S. 348 (1800) Thurston v. Koch. Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District. October Term, 1800 THIS cause came before the Court on the following case, stated by the counsel, Condy, for the plaintiff, and Ingersoll, for the defendant. ‘On the 13th of October 1796, William I. Vredenburgh, of the city of New-York, merchant, […]

Read More