BENJAMIN J. KNAPP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. EDMUND BANKS. JANUARY TERM, 1844. Where the plaintiff in the court below claims $2000 or more, and the ruling of the court is for a less sum, he is entitled to a writ of error. But the defendant is not entitled to such writ where the judgment against […]
Articles Tagged: 43 U.S. 73
43 U.S. 73
43 U.S. 73 2 How. 73 11 L.Ed. 184 BENJAMIN J. KNAPP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.EDMUND BANKS. January Term, 1844 THIS was a case brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the southern district of New York. Banks had recovered a judgment in that court, against Knapp, for […]