126 S.Ct. 1735 MARSHALL v. MARSHALL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 04-1544. Argued February 28, 2006. Decided May 1, 2006. Among longstanding limitations on federal-court jurisdiction otherwise properly exercised are the so-called “domestic relations” and “probate” exceptions. Neither is compelled by the text of the Constitution or […]
Articles Tagged: 126 S. Ct. 1735
Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006)
547 U.S. 293 (2006) MARSHALL v. MARSHALL No. 04-1544. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 28, 2006. Decided May 1, 2006. *298 Kent L. Richland argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Dana Gardner Adelstein, Alan Diamond, Edward L. Xanders, and Philip W. Boesch, Jr. Deanne E. Maynard argued the […]