Decided on December 16, 2014
No. 235 SSM 24
v
Robert L. Ingram, Respondent.
Submitted by David A. Heraty, for appellant.
Submitted by Sherry A. Chase, for respondent.
[*2]
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The determination as to whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods , 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided December 16, 2014
WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…
Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…
Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…
140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…
140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…
140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…