Decided on November 20, 2014
No. 231 SSM 23
v
Karen M. Caza, Appellant.
Submitted by Martin J. McGuinness, for appellant.
Respondent, precluded.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently, is unpreserved for our review (see CPL [*2]470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-493 [2008]).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided November 20, 2014
WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…
Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…
Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…
140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…
140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…
140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…