DAHDA v. UNITED STATES, 584 U.S. ___ (2018)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Exclusionary Rule, Wiretapping

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See?United States?v.?Detroit Timber […]

Read More

OLMSTEAD v. UNITED STATES, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment, Wiretapping

277 U.S. 438 277 U.S. 438 48 S.Ct. 564 72 L.Ed. 944 OLMSTEAD et al.v.UNITED STATES. GREEN et al. v. SAME McINNIS v. SAME. No. 493. No. 532. No. 533. Argued Feb. 20 and 21, 1928. Decided June 4, 1928. Mr. John F. Dore, of Seattle, Wash., for petitioners Olmstead and others. [Argument of Counsel […]

Read More

Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)

Issues: Exclusionary Rule, Fourth Amendment, Wiretapping

389 U.S. 347 88 S.Ct. 507 19 L.Ed.2d 576 Charles KATZ, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES. No. 35. Argued Oct. 17, 1967. Decided Dec. 18, 1967. Harvey A. Schneider and Burton Marks, Beverly Hills, Cal., for petitioner. John S. Martin, Jr., Washington, D.C., for respondent. MR. JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The petitioner was […]

Read More

Kaiser v. New York , 394 U.S. 280

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fourteenth Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Wiretapping

394 U.S. 280 89 S.Ct. 1044 22 L.Ed.2d 274 Thomas R. KAISER, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK. No. 62. Argued Jan. 16, 1969. Decided March 24, 1969. Rehearing Denied May 5, 1969. See 394 U.S. 1025, 89 S.Ct 1622. Counsel: Peter L. F. Sabbatino, New York City, for petitioner. Henry J. Boitel, New York City, for […]

Read More

United States v. Giordano, 416 U.S. 505 (1974)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Exclusionary Rule, Exclusionary Rule, Fourth Amendment, Wiretapping

416 U.S. 505 94 S.Ct. 1820 40 L.Ed.2d 341 UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. Dominic Nicholas GIORDANO et al. No. 72?1057. Argued Jan. 8, 1974. Decided May 13, 1974. Syllabus Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 provides in 18 U.S.C. ? 2516(1) that ‘the Attorney General, or any Assistant […]

Read More

Dye v. New Jersey, 409 U.S. 1090 (1972)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment, Wiretapping

409 U.S. 1090 93 S.Ct. 699 34 L.Ed.2d 675 Bentley Andrew DYE v. NEW JERSEY. No. 72-5535. Supreme Court of the United States December 18, 1972 On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting. Petitioner was convicted […]

Read More