139 S.Ct. 1826 (2019) 587 U.S. ___ Jason J. MONT, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES. No. 17-8995.Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 26, 2019.Decided June 3, 2019.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Vanessa Malone, Akron, Ohio, for Petitioner. Jenny C. Ellickson, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Stephen […]
Archives
DORSEY v. UNITED STATES, 567 U.S. 260 (2012)
132 S.Ct. 2321 (2012)567 U.S.? 260183 L.Ed.2d 250 Edward DORSEY, Sr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES. Corey A. Hill, Petitioner v. United States. Nos. 11-5683, 11-5721.Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 17, 2012.Decided June 21, 2012. Headnotes FAIR SENTENCING ACT OF 2010 Lower Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Crack Cocaine Offenses — Post-Act Sentencing of Pre-Act […]
BOBBY v. MITTS, 131 S.Ct. 1762 (2011)
?131 S.Ct. 1762 (2011) 563 U.S. 395 David BOBBY, Warden, Petitioner, v. Harry MITTS. Supreme Court of United States. No. 10-1000. May 2, 2011. Headnotes HABEAS CORPUS — Capital Jury Instructions — Penalty Phase — Consideration of Mandatory Death Sentence Before Life-Imprisonment Sentence. Instructions requiring a capital jury to consdier a mandatory death sentence before […]
DEAN v. UNITED STATES, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United […]
DESCAMPS v. UNITED STATES, 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013)
Syllabus DESCAMPS v. UNITED STATES ( ) 466 Fed. Appx. 563, reversed. Syllabus [HTML] [PDF] Opinion, Kagan [HTML] [PDF] Concurrence, Kennedy [HTML] [PDF] Concurrence, Thomas [HTML] [PDF] Dissent, Alito [HTML] [PDF] NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion […]
Molina-Martinez v. United States, 578 U.S. ___ (2016)
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]