ROTKISKE v. KLEMM, 589 U.S. ___ (2019)

Issues: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

140 S.Ct. 355 (2019) 589 U.S. ___ Kevin C. ROTKISKE, Petitioner v. Paul KLEMM, et al. No. 18-328.Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 16, 2019.Decided December 10, 2019. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Counsel: Scott E. Gant, Washington, DC, for the petitioner Shay Dvoretzky, […]

Read More

OBDUSKEY v. MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS LLP, 586 U.S. ___ (2019)

Issues: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary […]

Read More

HENSON v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC., 582 U.S. ___ (2017)

Issues: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

  NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]

Read More

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC v. JOHNSON, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)

Issues: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

  NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]

Read More

Sheriff v. Gillie, 578 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More