541 U.S. 36 (2004) 124 S. Ct. 1354 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 Michael D. CRAWFORD, Petitioner v. WASHINGTON. No. 02-9410.Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 10, 2003.Decided March 8, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. HEADNOTES CONSTITUTIONAL LAW –> Confrontation Clause –> Testimonial Statements –> Admission of Tape-Recorded Statement –> Cross-Examination […]
141 S.Ct. 1547 (2021) Thedrick EDWARDS, Petitioner v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden. No. 19-5807.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 2, 2020.Decided May 17, 2021.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Documents Petitioner’s Opening Brief Respondent’s Brief Petitioner’s Reply Brief Counsel André Bélanger, Baton Rouge, LA, for the petitioner. […]
140 S.Ct. 1390 (2020) 590 U.S. 83 Evangelisto RAMOS, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA. No. 18-5924.Supreme Court of United States.Argued October 7, 2019.Decided April 20, 2020.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT. Documents Petitioner’s Brief Respondent’s Brief Petitioner’s Reply Brief Counsel Jeffrey L. Fisher, Stanford, CA, for the petitioner Elizabeth Murrill, […]
140 S.Ct. 702 (2020) 589 U.S. ___ James Erin McKINNEY, Petitioner, v. ARIZONA. No. 18-1109.*Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 11, 2019.Decided February 25, 2020.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. Counsel Natman Schaye, Emily K. Skinner, Amy Armstrong, Arizona Capital, Representation, Project, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner. Amy L. Marshak, Jonathan […]
139 S.Ct. 2369 (2019) 588 U.S. ___ UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. Andre Ralph HAYMOND. No. 17-1672.Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 26, 2019.Decided June 26, 2019. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Counsel Eric J. Feigin for the petitioner. William D. Lunn for the respondent. […]
NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.?C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to […]
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VANESSA STUART v. ALABAMA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF ?CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA No. 17?1676. Decided November 19, 2018 ?The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR ?joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. More and more, […]
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See?United States?v.?Detroit Timber […]
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary […]
132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012) Blaine LAFLER, Petitioner v. Anthony COOPER. No. 10-209.Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 31, 2011.Decided March 21, 2012. Headnotes CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Right to Counsel — Effective Assistance — Counsel’s Ineffective Plea Offer Advice. Where counsel’s ineffective advice led to a plea offer’s rejection, and where prejudice alleged is having […]
132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012) MISSOURI, Petitioner v. Galin E. FRYE. No. 10-444.Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 31, 2011.Decided March 21, 2012. Headnotes CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Right to Counsel — Effective Assistance — Counsel’s Duty to Communicate Plea Offer. Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel extends to consideration of plea offers that […]
132 S.Ct. 2344 (2012) SOUTHERN UNION COMPANY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES. No. 11-94.Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 19, 2012.Decided June 21, 2012. Headnotes CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Right to Jury Trial. Jury’s Determination of Facts — Apprendi’s Application to Criminal Fines. Rule of?Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 — that Sixth Amendment reserves […]
132 S.Ct. 2221 (2012) 467 U.S. 50 183 L.Ed.2d 89 Sandy WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of United States. No. 10-8505. Argued December 6, 2011. Decided June 18, 2012. Headnotes CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Confrontation of Witnesses — Forensic Specialist Testimony. In petitioner’s bench trial for rape, testimony of a state police crime lab forensic […]
No. 10-10. 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011) 564 U.S. 431 180 L.Ed.2d 452 Michael D. TURNER, Petitioner, v. Rebecca L. ROGERS et al. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 23, 2011. Decided June 20, 2011. Headnotes: Constitutional Law — Due Process — Indigent noncustodial parent — Child support order — Counsel for civil contempt proceedings. […]
No. 09-10876. 131 S.Ct. 2705 (2011) 564 U.S. 647 180 L.Ed.2d 610 Donald BULLCOMING, Petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 2, 2011. Decided June 23, 2011. Headnotes: Constitutional Law — Confrontation of Witnesses — Forensic evidence — Testimonial certification of laboratory report. Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause does not permit prosecution […]
No. 16-6219. 137 S.Ct. 2058 (2017) Erick Daniel DAVILA, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 24, 2017. Decided June 26, 2017. Counsel: Seth Kretzer, Houston TX, appointed by this Court, for petitioner. Scott A. Keller, Solicitor General, for the respondent. Jonathan […]
137 S.Ct. 1899 (2017) 582 U.S. ___ Kentel Myrone WEAVER, Petitioner v. MASSACHUSETTS. No. 16-240.Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 19, 2017.Decided June 22, 2017.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Counsel Michael B. Kimberly, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Randall E. Ravitz, Boston, MA, for Respondent. Ann O’Connell for the […]
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CLARK ELMORE v. DONALD R. HOLBROOK, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON? ?STATE PENITENTIARY ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED ?STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 15?7848. Decided October 17, 2016 ?The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG ?joins, […]
Briefs: Petitioner’s Brief Respondent’s Brief Petitioner’s Reply Brief NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions […]