NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
Archives
LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. PROMEGA CORP., 580 U.S. ___ (2017)
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
ALREADY, LLC v. NIKE, INC., 568 U.S. ___ (2013)
133 S.Ct. 721 (2013) 184 L. Ed. 2d 553 ALREADY, LLC, dba Yums, Petitioner v. NIKE, INC. Supreme Court of United States. No. 11-982. Argued November 7, 2012. Decided January 9, 2013. Counsel: James W. Dabney, New York, NY, for Petitioner. Ginger D. Anders, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of […]
Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc., 580 U.S. ___ (2016)
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 579 U.S. ___ (2016)
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 579 U.S. ___ (2016)
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287 (1948)
333 U.S. 287 333 U.S. 287 68 S.Ct. 550 92 L.Ed. 701 UNITED STATESv.LINE MATERIALS CO. et al. No. 8. Reargued Nov. 12, 13, 1947. Decided March 8, 1948. Mr. Frederick Bernays Wiener, of Providence, R.I., for appellant. Mr. John Lord O’Brian, of Washington, D.C., for appellees. Mr. Albert R. Connelly, of New York City, […]
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., 575 U.S. ___ (2015)
United States Supreme Court B&B HARDWARE, INC. v. HARGIS INDUSTRIES, INC., DBA SEALTITE BUILDING FASTENERS ET AL., ET AL., (2015) No. 13-352 Argued: December 2, 2014????Decided: March 24, 2015 Syllabus Respondent Hargis Industries, Inc. (Hargis), tried to register its trademark for SEALTITE with the United States Patent and Trademark Office pursuant to the Lanham Act. […]
Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. 591 (1834)
Transformed by Public.Resource.Org, Inc., at Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:05:45 GMT
Evans v. Jordan, 13 U.S. 199 (1815)
Transformed by Public.Resource.Org, Inc., at Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:22:09 GMT
Tyler v. Tuel, 10 U.S. 324 (1810)
Transformed by Public.Resource.Org, Inc., at Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:20:31 GMT