140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. BANK N.A., et al. No. 17-1712.Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 13, 2020.Decided June 1, 2020. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Filings: Petitioners’ Brief Respondents’ Brief […]
140 S.Ct. 1168 (2020) Noris BABB, Petitioner v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs. No. 18-882.Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 15, 2020.Decided April 6, 2020.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. Counsel: Joseph D. Magri, Sean M. McFadden, Merkle & Magri, P.A., Tampa, FL, Roman […]
INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA. No. 18-1116.Supreme Court of the United States. Argued December 4, 2019.Decided February 26, 2020. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Counsel Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Attorney for Petitioners, Intel […]
140 S.Ct. 592 (2020) 589 U.S. ___ RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE OF IBM, et al., Petitioners v. Larry W. JANDER, et al. No. 18-1165.Supreme Court of United States. January 14, 2020.*593 Counsel Paul D. Clement, Washington, DC, for the petitioners. Jonathan Y. Ellis, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, […]
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary […]
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 17?587 _________________ MOUNT LEMMON FIRE DISTRICT, PETITIONER v. JOHN GUIDO, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF ?APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [November 6, 2018] Syllabus No. 17?587. Argued October 1, 2018?Decided November 6, 2018 John Guido and Dennis Rankin filed suit, […]
No. 16-1466. 138 S.Ct. 2448 (2018) Mark JANUS, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 31, et al. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 26, 2018. Decided June 27, 2018. Counsel: William L. Messenger?, Springfield, VA, for Petitioner. Noel J. Francisco?, Solicitor General, for the United States as amicus curiae, […]
540 U.S. 581 (2004) GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS, INC. v. CLINE ET AL. No. 02-1080.Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 12, 2003.Decided February 24, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Headnotes AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1967 Preference for older workers over younger workers. ADEA’s text, […]
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary […]
131 S.Ct. 1325 (2011) 563 U.S. 1 Kevin KASTEN, Petitioner, v. SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORPORATION. Supreme Court of United States. No. 09-834. Argued October 13, 2010. Decided March 22, 2011. Headnotes FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938 — Antiretaliation Suit — Discharge for Filing Complaint. In an antiretaliation suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act […]
131 S.Ct. 1866 (2011) 563 U.S. 421 CIGNA CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. Janice C. AMARA et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Supreme Court of United States. No. 09-804. Argued November 30, 2010. Decided May 16, 2011. Headnotes EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974 — Equitable Relief — Violations […]
131 S.Ct. 2630 (2011) 564 U.S. 685 180 L.Ed.2d 637 CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Petitioner, v. Robert McBRIDE. Supreme Court of United States. No. 10-235. Argued March 28, 2011. Decided June 23, 2011. Headnotes Federal Employers’ Liability Act — Railroad negligence — Proximate-cause standard –Jury instructions. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act does not incorporate “proximate cause” […]
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 15?1248 _________________ MCLANE COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER v. EQUAL ?EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF ?APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [April 3, 2017] Syllabus: No. 15?1248. Argued February 21, 2017?Decided April 3, 2017 Damiana Ochoa worked for eight years in […]
131 S.Ct. 2541 WAL-MART STORES, INC., PETITIONER v. BETTY DUKES ET AL. No. 10-277. Decided June 20, 2011. Headnotes: CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 Employment discrimination?Class certification.?In this Title VII employment discrimination case, certification of a nationwide class of 1.5 million women was not consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)?s commonality requirement, and […]
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
No. 14-1467. 806 F.3d 153 (2015) Sandra J. BABCOCK; James T. Kenaan, Jr.: Bradley J. Sarvey; Dale R. Lipan; Shawn J. Kelly; Samantha Pistorius; Anthony Blumling; Randal K. Cypher; Chad Neigh; Tory A. Coyle; Joseph Hanchosky; Darren M. Knox; Todd Walker; Michael Emery; Kevin Pollack; Ray Slater; Michael J. Shuler; Travis Maculski; Len Thornley; Jason […]