Due Process of Law – LexRoll.com

HURTADO v. CALIFORNIA, 110 U.S. 516 (1884)

Issues: Due Process Clause, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment

110 U.S. 516 (1884) HURTADO v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA. Supreme Court of United States.Argued January 22d, 23d, 1884.Decided March 3d, 1884.IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Syllabus 1. The words “due process of law” in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States do not necessarily require an indictment by a […]

MOORE v. TEXAS, 586 U.S. ___ (2019)

Issues: Atkins Claim, Cruel & Unusual Punishment Clause, Due Process of Law, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BOBBY JAMES MOORE v. TEXAS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 18?443. Decided February 19, 2019 ?PER CURIAM. In 2015, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that petitioner, Bobby James Moore, did not have intellectual disability and consequently was […]

TURNER v. ROGERS, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011)

Issues: Constitutional Law, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Right to Counsel

No. 10-10. 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011) 564 U.S. 431 180 L.Ed.2d 452 Michael D. TURNER, Petitioner, v. Rebecca L. ROGERS et al. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 23, 2011. Decided June 20, 2011. Headnotes: Constitutional Law — Due Process — Indigent noncustodial parent — Child support order — Counsel for civil contempt proceedings. […]

McWILLIAMS v. DUNN, 582 US ___ (2017)

Issues: Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Indigents: Assistance Of Psychiatrist

JAMES E. McWILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. Supreme Court of the United States. No. 16-5294. Argued April 24, 2017. Decided June 19, 2017. Counsel: Stephen B. Bright, Southern Center for Human Rights, sbright@schr.org, Attorneys for Petitioner, James E. McWilliams. Mark Aaron Loudon-Brown, mloudonbrown@schr.org, for James E. McWilliams. […]

NELSON v. COLORADO, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)

Issues: Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment

NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]

MOORE v. TEXAS, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)

Issues: Atkins Claim, Cruel & Unusual Punishment Clause, Death Penalty, Due Process of Law, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 15?797 _________________ BOBBY JAMES MOORE, PETITIONER v. TEXAS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS [March 28, 2017] No. 15?797.?Argued November 29, 2016?Decided March 28, 2017 Syllabus Petitioner Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for fatally shooting a […]

RIPPO v. BAKER, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)

Issues: Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MICHAEL DAMON RIPPO, PETITIONER v.RENEE BAKER, WARDEN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA No. 16?6316.?Decided March 6, 2017 Per Curiam. A Nevada jury convicted petitioner Michael Damon Rippo of first-degree murder and other offenses and sentenced him to death. During his trial, Rippo […]

IN RE OLIVER, 333 U.S. 257 (1948)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Sixth Amendment

333 U.S. 257 333 U.S. 257 68 S.Ct. 499 92 L.Ed. 682 In re OLIVER. No. 215. Argued Dec. 11, 1947. Decided March 8, 1948. Messrs. William Henry Gallagher, of Detroit, Mich., and Osmond K. Fraenkel, for petitioner. Mr. Edumund E. Shepherd, of Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the […]

Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942)

Issues: Compulsory Sterilization, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment

316 U.S. 535 316 U.S. 535 62 S.Ct. 1110 86 L.Ed. 1655 SKINNERv.STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. WILLIAMSON, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma. No. 782. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1942. Decided June 1, 1942. Messrs. W. J. Hulsey, H. I. Aston, and Guy L. Andrews, all of McAlester, Okl., for petitioner. Mr. Mac Q. Williamson, […]

STOVALL v. DENNO, 388 U.S. 293 (1967)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Line-Ups

388 U.S. 293 388 U.S. 293 87 S.Ct. 1967 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 Theodore STOVALL, Petitioner,v.Wilfred DENNO, Warden. No. 254. Argued Feb. 16, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Leon B. Polsky, New York City, for petitioner. William Cahn, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent. H. Richard Uviller, New York City, for New York State District Attorney’s Ass’n, as […]

Green v. Georgia, 442 U.S. 95 (1979)

Issues: Due Process of Law, Evidence Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Hearsay Rule

442 U.S. 95 99 S.Ct. 2150 60 L.Ed.2d 738 Roosevelt GREEN, Jr. v. State of GEORGIA. No. 78-5944. May 29, 1979. Syllabus Petitioner, who was indicted with one Moore for rape and murder, was tried separately in a Georgia state court. After the jury determined that petitioner was guilty of murder, a second proceeding was […]

Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975)

Issues: Constitutional Law, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Public Schools

419 U.S. 565 95 S.Ct. 729 42 L.Ed.2d 725 Norval GOSS et al., Appellants, v. Eileen LOPEZ et al. No. 73?898. Argued Oct. 16, 1974. Decided Jan. 22, 1975. [qtbl style=”color:gray;”]One-Sentence Takeaway:?The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that a public school conduct a hearing before subjecting a student to suspension.[/qtbl] Syllabus Appellee […]

Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973)

Issues: Due Process Clause, Due Process of Law, Evidence Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Hearsay Rule

410 U.S. 284 93 S.Ct. 1038 35 L.Ed.2d 297 Leon CHAMBERS, Petitioner, v. State of MISSISSIPPI. No. 71?5908. Argued Nov. 15, 1972. Decided Feb. 21, 1973. Counsel: Peter Westen for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. Timmie Hancock, Meadville, Miss., for respondent. [hr] Syllabus After petitioner was arrested for murder, another person […]

Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973)

Issues: Abortion, Contraceptives, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Gender Equality

410 U.S. 179 93 S.Ct. 739 35 L.Ed.2d 201 Mary DOE et al., Appellants, v. Arthur K. BOLTON, as Attorney General of the State of Georgia, et al. No. 70?40. Argued Dec. 13, 1971. Reargued Oct. 11, 1972. Decided Jan. 22, 1973. Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1973. See 410 U.S. 959, 93 S.Ct. 1410. Counsel: […]

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)

Issues: Abortion, Civil Rights, Due Process of Law, Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Gender Equality

410 U.S. 113 93 S.Ct. 705 35 L.Ed.2d 147 Jane ROE, et al., Appellants, v. Henry WADE. No. 70-18. Argued Dec. 13, 1971. Reargued Oct. 11, 1972. Decided Jan. 22, 1973. Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1973. See 410 U.S. 959, 93 S.Ct. 1409. Counsel: Sarah R. Weddington, Austin, Tex., for appellants. Robert C. Flowers, Asst. […]

Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 476 U.S. 747 (1986)

Issues: Abortion, Due Process of Law, Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Gender Equality

476 U.S. 747 106 S.Ct. 2169 90 L.Ed.2d 779 Richard THORNBURGH, et al., Appellants v. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS et al. No. 84-495. Argued Nov. 5, 1985. Decided June 11, 1986. Counsel: Andrew S. Gordon, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellants. Kathryn Kolbert, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees. [hr] Syllabus Appellees brought an action in Federal […]

Texas v. McCullough, 475 U.S. 134 (1986)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Sentencing

475 U.S. 134 106 S.Ct. 976 89 L.Ed.2d 104 TEXAS, Petitioner v. Sanford James McCULLOUGH. No. 84-1198. Argued Dec. 10, 1985. Decided Feb. 26, 1986. Syllabus Respondent was tried before a jury in a Texas District Court and convicted of murder. He elected to be sentenced by the jury, as was his right under Texas […]

HELICOPTEROS NACIONALES DE COLOMBIA v. HALL, 466 U.S. 408 (1984)

Issues: Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, General Jurisdiction, In Personam Jurisdiction, Minimum Contacts, Personal Jurisdiction

466 U.S. 408 (1984) 104 S.Ct. 1868 80 L.Ed. 404 HELICOPTEROS NACIONALES DE COLOMBIA, S. A. v. HALL ET AL. No. 82-1127.Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 8, 1983Decided April 24, 1984 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Headnotes CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Due Process — State-Court Jurisdiction — Wrongful-Death Actions — Defendant’s Contacts with […]

Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., Inc., 500 U.S. 614 (1991)

Issues: Batson Challenge, Due Process Clause, Due Process of Law, Fifth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment

500 U.S. 614 111 S.Ct. 2077 114 L.Ed.2d 660 Thaddeus Donald EDMONSON, Petitioner v. LEESVILLE CONCRETE COMPANY, INC. No. 89-7743. Argued Jan. 15, 1991. Decided June 3, 1991. [qtbl style=”color:gray;”] Summary:??The Supreme Court of the United States held that peremptory challenges may not be used to exclude jurors on the basis of race in?civil trials. […]

Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991)

Issues: Batson Challenge, Criminal Procedure, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment

499 U.S. 400 111 S.Ct. 1364 113 L.Ed.2d 411 Larry Joe POWERS, Petitioner, v. OHIO. No. 89-5011. Argued Oct. 9, 1990. Decided April 1, 1991. Syllabus During jury selection at his state-court trial for aggravated murder and related offenses, petitioner Powers, a white man, objected to the State’s use of peremptory challenges to remove seven […]