Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Speedy Trial Act of 1974

547 U.S. 489 (2006) ZEDNER v. UNITED STATES No. 05-5992. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 18, 2006. Decided June 5, 2006. *492 Edward S. Zas, by appointment of the Court, 546 U.S. 1167, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Barry D. Leiwant and Sean Hecker. Daryl Joseffer argued […]

Read More

CAREY v. MUSLADIN, 549 U.S. 70 (2006)

Issues: Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Habeas Corpus

127 S. Ct. 649 (2006) 549 U.S. 70 Thomas L. CAREY, Warden, Petitioner, v. Mathew MUSLADIN. No. 05-785. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 11, 2006. Decided December 11, 2006. *651 Gregory A. Ott, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner. David W. Fermino, San Francisco, CA, appointed by this Court, for respondent. Bill Lockyer, Attorney […]

Read More

Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Exclusionary Rule, Fourth Amendment, Knock & Announce

547 U.S. 586 (2006) HUDSON v. MICHIGAN No. 04-1360. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 9, 2006. Reargued May 18, 2006. Decided June 15, 2006. *587 David A. Moran argued and reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Timothy O’Toole, Steven R. Shapiro, Michael J. Steinberg, Kary L. Moss, and […]

Read More

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932)

Issues: Death Penalty, Right to Counsel, Sixth Amendment

287 U.S. 45 287 U.S. 45 53 S.Ct. 55 77 L.Ed. 158 POWELL et al.v.STATE OF ALABAMA. PATTERSON v. SAME. WEEMS et al. v. SAME. Nos. 98—100. Argued Oct. 10, 1932. Decided Nov. 7, 1932. [Syllabus from pages 45-47 intentionally omitted] Mr. Walter H. Pollak, of New York City, for petitioners. Mr. Thomas E. Knight, […]

Read More

Lynch v. Arizona, 578 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Batson Challenge, Death Penalty

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SHAWN PATRICK LYNCH v. ARIZONA on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of arizona No. 15?8366.?Decided May 31, 2016 Per Curiam. Under Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.?S. 154 (1994) , and its progeny, ?where a capital defendant?s future dangerousness is at issue, and the only […]

Read More

Johnson v. Lee, 578 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Habeas Corpus

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, WARDEN v. DONNA KAY LEE on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 15?789.?Decided May 31, 2016 Per Curiam. Federal habeas courts generally refuse to hear claims ?defaulted . . . in state court pursuant to […]

Read More

WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA, 579 U.S. 1 (2016)

Issues: Death Penalty, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment

136 S.Ct. 1899 (2016) 579 U.S. 1 Terrance WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA. No. 15-5040.Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 29, 2016.Decided June 9, 2016.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT. Counsel Stuart B. Lev, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner. Ronald Eisenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for Respondent. *1903 Leigh M. Skipper, Chief […]

Read More

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA , 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fifth Amendment, Miranda Warnings, Right Against Self-Incrimination

384 U.S. 436 86 S.Ct. 1602 16 L.Ed.2d 694 Ernesto A. MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. STATE OF ARIZONA. Michael VIGNERA, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NEW YORK. Carl Calvin WESTOVER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Roy Allen STEWART. Nos. 759?761, 584. Argued Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. […]

Read More

Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment, Vehicle Searches

338 U.S. 160 69 S.Ct. 1302 93 L.Ed. 1879 BRINEGAR v. UNITED STATES. No. 12. Argued Oct. 18, 19, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1949. See 70 S.Ct. 31. Counsel: Mr. Irvine E. Ungerman, Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner. Mr. Stanley M. Silverberg, Washington, D.C., for respondent. [hr] Syllabus Petitioner was convicted […]

Read More

McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 (1948)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Exclusionary Rule, Exigent Circumstances, Fourth Amendment

335 U.S. 451 69 S.Ct. 191 93 L.Ed. 153 McDONALD et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 36. Argued Oct, 13, 1948. Decided Dec. 13, 1948. Counsel: Messrs. John Lewis Smith, Jr. and Charles . Ford, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Frederick Bernays Wiener, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. [hr] Syllabus Suspecting that petitioner […]

Read More

IN RE OLIVER, 333 U.S. 257 (1948)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Sixth Amendment

333 U.S. 257 333 U.S. 257 68 S.Ct. 499 92 L.Ed. 682 In re OLIVER. No. 215. Argued Dec. 11, 1947. Decided March 8, 1948. Messrs. William Henry Gallagher, of Detroit, Mich., and Osmond K. Fraenkel, for petitioner. Mr. Edumund E. Shepherd, of Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the […]

Read More

Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment

392 U.S. 40 88 S.Ct. 1889 20 L.Ed.2d 917 Nelson SIBRON, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK. John Francis PETERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK. Nos. 63 and 74. Argued Dec. 11 and 12, 1967. Decided June 10, 1968. Counsel: Kalman Finkel and Gretchen White Oberman, New York City, for appellant, Sibron. William I. […]

Read More

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment, Terry Stop & Frisk

392 U.S. 1 88 S.Ct. 1868 20 L.Ed.2d 889 John W. TERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO. No. 67. Argued Dec. 12, 1967. Decided June 10, 1968. Counsel: Louis Stokes, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Reuben M. Payne, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. [hr] Syllabus A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been […]

Read More

Massachusetts v. Painten, 389 U.S. 560 (1968)

Issues: Exclusionary Rule

389 U.S. 560 88 S.Ct. 660 19 L.Ed.2d 770 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Petitioner, v. Donald M. PAINTEN. No. 37. Argued Oct. 18, 1967. Decided Jan. 15, 1968. Counsel: Elliot L. Richardson, Boston, Mass., for petitioner. Louis M. Nordlinger, Boston, Mass., for respondent. [hr] Syllabus Record in this case involving State’s use of evidence to convict […]

Read More

Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)

Issues: Exclusionary Rule, Fourth Amendment, Wiretapping

389 U.S. 347 88 S.Ct. 507 19 L.Ed.2d 576 Charles KATZ, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES. No. 35. Argued Oct. 17, 1967. Decided Dec. 18, 1967. Harvey A. Schneider and Burton Marks, Beverly Hills, Cal., for petitioner. John S. Martin, Jr., Washington, D.C., for respondent. MR. JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The petitioner was […]

Read More

Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967)

Issues: Fourteenth Amendment, Fourth Amendment

388 U.S. 41 87 S.Ct. 1873 18 L.Ed.2d 1040 Ralph BERGER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 615. Argued April 13, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Counsel: Joseph E. Brill, New York City, for petitioner. H. Richard Uviller, New York City, for respondent. [hr] Syllabus Petitioner was indicted and convicted of conspiracy to bribe […]

Read More

STOVALL v. DENNO, 388 U.S. 293 (1967)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Due Process of Law, Fourteenth Amendment, Line-Ups

388 U.S. 293 388 U.S. 293 87 S.Ct. 1967 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 Theodore STOVALL, Petitioner,v.Wilfred DENNO, Warden. No. 254. Argued Feb. 16, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Leon B. Polsky, New York City, for petitioner. William Cahn, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent. H. Richard Uviller, New York City, for New York State District Attorney’s Ass’n, as […]

Read More

McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 (1967)

Issues: Confrontation Clause, Fourth Amendment, Informants

386 U.S. 300 87 S.Ct. 1056 18 L.Ed.2d 62 George McCRAY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 159. Argued Jan. 10 and 11, 1967. Decided March 20, 1967. Rehearing Denied May 8, 1967. See 386 U.S. 1042, 87 S.Ct. 1474. [qtbl style=”color:gray;”] One-Sentence Takeaway:?When information provided by a reliable informant is used to establish probable […]

Read More

Osborn v. United States, 385 U.S. 323 (1966)

Issues: Entrapment, Fourth Amendment

385 U.S. 323 87 S.Ct. 439 17 L.Ed.2d 394 Z. T. OSBORN, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. James R. HOFFA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. Duke Lee LEWIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 29, 32 and 36. Supreme Court of the United States December 12, 1966 Counsel: Jacob Kossman argued the cause and filed briefs for […]

Read More

Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 (1966)

Issues: Fourth Amendment

385 U.S. 206 87 S.Ct. 424 17 L.Ed.2d 312 Duke Lee LEWIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. No. 36. Argued Oct. 17, 1966. Decided Dec. 12, 1966. Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1967. See 386 U.S. 939, 87 S.Ct. 951. [qtbl style=”color:gray;”] One-Sentence Takeaway: ?An undercover officer who is invited to defendant’s home to execute drug transactions […]

Read More