134 S.Ct. 2427 (2014) 573 U.S. 302 UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP, Petitioner v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al. American Chemistry Council, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al. Energy-Intensive Manufacturers Working Group on Greenhouse Gas Regulation, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al. Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. […]
Archives
AMERICAN ELEC. POWER CO., INC. v. CONNECTICUT, 131 S.Ct. 2527 (2011)
131 S.Ct. 2527 (2011) 564 U.S. 410 180 L.Ed.2d 435 AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CONNECTICUT et al. Supreme Court of United States. No. 10-174. Argued April 19, 2011. Decided June 20, 2011. Counsel: Peter D. Keisler, Washington, DC, for Petitioners. Neal Kumar Katyal, for Respondent Tennessee Valley Authority, supporting the […]
AMERICAN ELEC. POWER CO., INC. v. CONNECTICUT, 131 S.Ct. 2527 (2011)
No. 10-174. 131 S.Ct. 2527 (2011) 180 L. Ed. 2d 435 AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CONNECTICUT et al. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 19, 2011. Decided June 20, 2011. Counsel: Peter D. Keisler, Washington, DC, for Petitioners. Neal Kumar Katyal, for Respondent Tennessee Valley Authority, supporting the Petitioners. […]
Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) [SLIP COPY]
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]