NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
Category: 2017
BUCK v. DAVIS, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)
Briefs: Petitioner’s Brief Respondent’s Brief Petitioner’s Reply Brief NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions […]
ARTHUR v. DUNN, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES THOMAS D. ARTHUR v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, ?COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT ??OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16?602. Decided February 21, 2017 ?The motion of Certain Medical Professionals and Medical Ethicists for leave to […]
ABBOTT v. VEASEY, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)
Cite as: 580 U. S. ____ (2017) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG ABBOTT, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ET AL. v.?MARC VEASEY, ET AL . ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED ?STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16?393. Decided January 23, 2017 ?The petition for a writ of certiorari […]
LIGHTFOOT v. CENDANT MORTGAGE CORP., 580 U.S. ___ (2017)
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]
WHITE v. PAULY, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES RAY WHITE, et?al. v. DANIEL T. PAULY, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF SAMUEL PAULY, DECEASED et?al. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit No. 16?67.?Decided January 9, 2017 Per Curiam. This case addresses the situation of an […]