ELMORE v. HOLBROOK, 580 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Death Penalty, Right to Counsel, Sixth Amendment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CLARK ELMORE v. DONALD R. HOLBROOK, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON? ?STATE PENITENTIARY ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED ?STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 15?7848. Decided October 17, 2016 ?The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG ?joins, […]

Read More

Shaw v. United States, 580 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Criminal Law

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Sireci v. Florida, No. 16-5247 (12/12/2016)

Issues: Cruel & Unusual Punishment Clause, Death Penalty

United States Supreme Court HENRY PERRY SIRECI v. FLORIDA, (2016) No. 16-5247 Argued: ????Decided: December 12, 2016 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE BREYER, dissenting from denial of certiorari. Henry Sireci, the petitioner, was tried, convicted of murder, and first sentenced to death in 1976. He has lived in prison under […]

Read More

Salman v. United States, 580 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Securities & Exchange, Securities Exchange Act of 1934

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc., 580 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Intellectual Property, Patents

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Bravo-Fernandez v. United States, 580 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Double Jeopardy

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Juveniles

United States Supreme Court BOBBY JERRY TATUM v. ARIZONA, (2016) No. 15-8850 Argued: ????Decided: October 31, 2016 ?????The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division […]

Read More

Elmore v. Holbrook, 580 U. S. ____ (2016)

Issues: Right to Counsel, Sixth Amendment

United States Supreme Court CLARK ELMORE v. DONALD R. HOLBROOK, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY, (2016) No. 15-7848 Argued: ????Decided: October 17, 2016 ?????The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. Petitioner Clark Elmore was convicted of murder in 1995 and was […]

Read More

Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Juveniles, Retroactivity, Sentencing

136 S.Ct. 718 (2016) 577 US. __ Henry MONTGOMERY, Petitioner v. LOUISIANA. No. 14-280.Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 13, 2015.Decided January 25, 2016.As Revised January 27, 2016.*725 Richard D. Bernstein, appointed by this Court, as amicus curiae. Michael R. Dreeben for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, […]

Read More

Bosse v. Oklahoma, 580 U. S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Death Penalty, Eighth Amendment

United States Supreme Court SHAUN MICHAEL BOSSE v. OKLAHOMA, (2016) No. 15-9173 Argued: ????Decided: October 11, 2016 PER CURIAM. In Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.?S. 496 (1987), this Court held that “the Eighth Amendment prohibits a capital sentencing jury from considering victim impact evidence” that does not “relate directly to the circumstances of the crime.” […]

Read More

RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty., 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Statute (RICO)

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), Criminal Law, Sentencing

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Bribery, Criminal Law, Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1951)

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Whole Woman?s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Abortion

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Voisine v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Firearms Prohibition

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Fisher v. Univ. of Tex. at Austin, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Tribal sovereignty

NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.?C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to […]

Read More

Taylor v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Commerce Clause, Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1951)

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More