547 U.S. 47 (2006) RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL. v. FORUM FOR ACADEMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, INC., ET AL. No. 04-1152. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 6, 2005. Decided March 6, 2006. *50 Solicitor General Clement argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Keisler, Deputy […]
Category: 2006
United States v. Georgia, 546 U.S. 151 (2006)
546 U.S. 151 (2006) UNITED STATES v. GEORGIA ET AL. No. 04-1203. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 2005. Decided January 10, 2006.[*] *152 Solicitor General Clement argued the cause for the United States in No. 04-1203. With him on the brief were Acting Assistant Attorney General Schlozman, Patricia A. Millett, David K. […]
Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust, 547 U.S. 633 (2006)
547 U.S. 633 (2006) KIRCHER et al. v. PUTNAM FUNDS TRUST et al. No. 05-409. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 24, 2006. Decided June 15, 2006. *635 David C. Frederick argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Scott K. Attaway, Robert L. King, and Klint L. Bruno. Mark A. […]
Dixon v. United States, 548 U.S. 1 (2006)
Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006)
547 U.S. 715 (2006) RAPANOS et al. v. UNITED STATES No. 04-1034. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 21, 2006. Decided June 19, 2006.[*] *718 M. Reed Hopper argued the cause for petitioners in No. 04-1034. With him on the briefs was Robin L. Rivett. Timothy A. Stoepker argued the cause for petitioners in […]
Dolan v. Postal Service, 546 U.S. 481 (2006)
546 U.S. 481 (2006) DOLAN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ET al. No. 04-848. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 7, 2005. Decided February 22, 2006. *482 James R. Radmore argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Michael T. Kirkpatrick. *483 Patricia A. Millett argued the cause for respondents. With […]
Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., 547 U.S. 356 (2006)
547 U.S. 356 (2006) SEREBOFF et ux. v. MID ATLANTIC MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. No. 05-260. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 28, 2006. Decided May 15, 2006. *358 Peter K. Stris argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Radha A. Pathak, John C. Stein, Shaun P. Martin, William Delgado, and […]
Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 546 U.S. 454 (2006)
546 U.S. ___ (2006) ANTHONY ASH, ET AL. v. TYSON FOODS, INC. No. 05-379. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 21, 2006. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. PER CURIAM. Petitioners Anthony Ash and John Hithon were superintendents at a poultry plant owned […]
Gonzales v. O Centro Esp?rita Beneficente Uni?o Do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006)
546 U.S. 418 (2006) GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. O CENTRO ESPIRITA BENEFICENTE UNIAO DO VEGETAL ET AL. No. 04-1084. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 1, 2005.Decided February 21, 2006. *422 Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General […]
Arlington Central School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006)
Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006)
547 U.S. 293 (2006) MARSHALL v. MARSHALL No. 04-1544. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 28, 2006. Decided May 1, 2006. *298 Kent L. Richland argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Dana Gardner Adelstein, Alan Diamond, Edward L. Xanders, and Philip W. Boesch, Jr. Deanne E. Maynard argued the […]
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp., 547 U.S. 451 (2006)
547 U.S. 451 (2006) ANZA et al. v. IDEAL STEEL SUPPLY CORP. No. 04-433. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 27, 2006. Decided June 5, 2006. *453 David C. Frederick argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Richard L. Huffman, William M. Brodsky, and V. David Rivkin. Kevin P. Roddy […]
Will v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006)
546 U.S. 345 (2006) WILL ET AL. v. HALLOCK ET AL. No. 04-1332. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 28, 2005. Decided January 18, 2006 *347 Douglas Hallward-Driemeier argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Keisler, Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler, and Barbara L. Herwig. […]
Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230 (2006)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit, 547 U.S. 71 (2006)
547 U.S. 71 (2006) MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. v. DABIT No. 04-1371. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 18, 2006. Decided March 21, 2006. *73 Jay B. Kasner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Preeta D. Bansal, Edward J. Yodowitz, Scott D. Musoff, and Joanne Gaboriault. […]
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30 (2006)
Ross v. Kansas, 548 U.S. 912 (2006)
548 U.S. 912 (2006) ROSS v. KANSAS. No. 05-10804. Supreme Court of United States. June 26, 2006. Certiorari denied.
Evans v. Chavis, 546 U.S. 189 (2006)
546 U.S. 189 (2006) EVANS, ACTING WARDEN v. CHAVIS No. 04-721. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 2005. Decided January 10, 2006. *191 Catherine Baker Chatman, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Manuel M. Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Robert […]
Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006)
546 U.S. 243 (2006) GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. OREGON ET AL. No. 04-623. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 5, 2005.Decided January 17, 2006. *247 Solicitor General Clement argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Assistant Attorney General Keisler, Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Katsas, […]
Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459 (2006)
546 U.S. 459 (2006) LANCE ET AL. v. DENNIS, COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE No. 05-555. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 21, 2006. *460 PER CURIAM. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevents the lower federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over cases brought by “state-court losers” challenging “state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced.” Exxon […]