541 U.S. 36 (2004) 124 S. Ct. 1354 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 Michael D. CRAWFORD, Petitioner v. WASHINGTON. No. 02-9410.Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 10, 2003.Decided March 8, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. HEADNOTES CONSTITUTIONAL LAW –> Confrontation Clause –> Testimonial Statements –> Admission of Tape-Recorded Statement –> Cross-Examination […]
Category: 2004
VIETH v. JUBELIRER, 541 U.S. 267 (2004)
541 U.S. 267 (2004) 124 S.Ct. 1769 VIETH ET AL. v. JUBELIRER, PRESIDENT OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SENATE, ET AL. No. 02-1580.Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 10, 2003.Decided April 28, 2004.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Headnotes CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Apportionment — Congressional Redistricting — Political Gerrymandering. […]
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO, LLP., 540 U.S. 398 (2004)
540 U.S. 398 (2004) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO, LLP. No. 02-682.Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 14, 2003.Decided January 13, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Headnotes ANTITRUST. Sherman Act — Sharing Telephone Network. A complaint alleging breach of an incumbent […]
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE v. FLAMINGO INDUSTRIES (USA) LTD., 540 U.S. 736 (2004)
540 U.S. 736 (2004) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE v. FLAMINGO INDUSTRIES (USA) LTD. ET AL. No. 02-1290.Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 1, 2003.Decided February 25, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Headnotes ANTITRUST. Sherman Act — Antitrust Person — Postal Service Status. United States Postal Service […]
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS, INC. v. CLINE, 540 U.S. 581 (2004)
540 U.S. 581 (2004) GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS, INC. v. CLINE ET AL. No. 02-1080.Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 12, 2003.Decided February 24, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Headnotes AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1967 Preference for older workers over younger workers. ADEA’s text, […]