439 U.S. 886 99 S.Ct. 241 58 L.Ed.2d 233 NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and Myron Farber, petitioners,v.NEW JERSEY and Mario E. Jascalevich No. 78-540 Supreme Court of the United States October 6, 1978 Motion to vacate stay granted, and it is ordered that the order of Mr. Justice STEWART dated September 26, 1978, is hereby, […]
Category: 1978
439 U.S. 320
439 U.S. 320 99 S.Ct. 644 58 L.Ed.2d 549 MOBAY CHEMICAL CORPORATIONv.Douglas COSTLE, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency. No. 78-308. Jan. 8, 1979. Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1979. See 440 U.S. 940, 99 S.Ct. 1291. PER CURIAM. 1 Appellant contends that the use of one submitter’s data, filed prior to 1970, in the consideration […]
439 U.S. 459
439 U.S. 459 99 S.Ct. 709 58 L.Ed.2d 733 Emerson E. HARLINv.State of MISSOURI. No. 77-6062. Jan. 15, 1979. PER CURIAM. 1 On appeal of his criminal conviction to the Supreme Court of Missouri, petitioner contended that his constitutional right to a jury drawn from a fair cross section of the community had been denied […]
439 U.S. 1103
439 U.S. 1103 99 S.Ct. 882 59 L.Ed.2d 63 Daniel Roy REZIN, petitioner,v.Charles L. WOLFF, Jr., Warden No. 78-5619 Supreme Court of the United States January 8, 1979 On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Mr. […]
439 U.S. 8
439 U.S. 8 99 S.Ct. 49 58 L.Ed.2d 7 Bernard CAREY, State’s Attorney of Cook County, Illinoisv.Ralph M. WYNN et al. Eugene F. DIAMOND v. Ralph M. WYNN et al. Nos. 78-229, 78-239. Oct. 16, 1978. PER CURIAM. 1 A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional certain sections of the Illinois Abortion […]
439 U.S. 1355
439 U.S. 1355 99 S.Ct. 35 439 U.S. 1369 58 L.Ed.2d 63 58 L.Ed.2d 77 The GENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF the UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, Petitioner,v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (Frank T. Barr, et al., Real Parties in Interest). No. A-200. Aug. 24, 1978. Sept. 1, 1978. ORDER GRANTING […]
439 U.S. 1357
439 U.S. 1357 99 S.Ct. 27 58 L.Ed.2d 65 DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, Applicant,v.Mark BRINKMAN et al.No. A-212. Aug. 28, 1978. Mr. Justice STEWART, Circuit Justice. 1 The Dayton, Ohio, Board of Education requests that I stay execution of the judgment and mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in this case […]
439 U.S. 1358
439 U.S. 1358 99 S.Ct. 28 58 L.Ed.2d 67 DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, Applicant,v.Mark BRINKMAN et al.No. A-212. Aug. 30, 1978. Mr. Justice REHNQUIST. The applicant, Dayton Board of Education, has presented to me an application for stay of the judgment and mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which has been […]
439 U.S. 1355
439 U.S. 1355 99 S.Ct. 35 439 U.S. 1369 58 L.Ed.2d 63 58 L.Ed.2d 77 The GENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF the UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, Petitioner,v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (Frank T. Barr, et al., Real Parties in Interest). No. A-200. Aug. 24, 1978. Sept. 1, 1978. ORDER GRANTING […]
439 U.S. 280
439 U.S. 280 99 S.Ct. 712 58 L.Ed.2d 519 Commonwealth of MASSACHUSETTS, petitioner,v.Charles F. WHITE No. 77-1388 Supreme Court of the United States December 11, 1978 Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1979. See 439 U.S. 1136, 99 S.Ct. 1061. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Dec. 11, 1978. PER CURIAM. 1 […]
439 U.S. 281
439 U.S. 281 99 S.Ct. 712 58 L.Ed.2d 520 Jacquelyn E. HUNTER, petitioner,v.Gerald Wallace DEAN, Sheriff No. 77-6248 Supreme Court of the United States December 11, 1978 On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia. Dec. 11, 1978. PER CURIAM. 1 The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. CC? | Transformed […]
Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978)
434 U.S. 374 98 S.Ct. 673 54 L.Ed.2d 618 Thomas E. ZABLOCKI, Milwaukee County Clerk, etc., Appellant, v. Roger C. REDHAIL, etc. No. 76-879. Argued Oct. 4, 1977. Decided Jan. 18, 1978. Syllabus Wisconsin statute providing that any resident of that State “having minor issue not in his custody and which he is under obligation […]