Category: 1967

389 U.S. 40 389 U.S. 40 88 S.Ct. 194 19 L.Ed.2d 41 Louis ROBERTSv.LaVALLEE, Warden. No. 193, Misc. Oct. 23, 1967. Warren H. Greene, Jr., for petitioner. Leon B. Polsky, for Legal Aid Society of New York, amicus curiae. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioner is an indigent. He was charged with robbery, larceny, and assault in […]

389 U.S. 413 389 U.S. 413 88 S.Ct. 541 19 L.Ed.2d 643 Bennie W. BROOKSv.FLORIDA. No. 14, Misc. Dec. 18, 1967. Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioner, Bennie Brooks, was convicted of participating in a riot in the Florida prison where he […]

389 U.S. 416 389 U.S. 416 88 S.Ct. 526 19 L.Ed.2d 647 Betty DAMICO et al.v.CALIFORNIA et al. No. 629, Misc. Decided Dec. 18, 1967. George F. Duke, for appellants. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Richard L. Mayers and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Attys. Gen., for appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for […]

389 U.S. 421 389 U.S. 421 88 S.Ct. 578 19 L.Ed.2d 651 Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al.v.David I. WELLS et al. No. 691. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. December 18, 1967 Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and […]

389 U.S. 384 389 U.S. 384 88 S.Ct. 528 19 L.Ed.2d 621 CASE-SWAYNE COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner,v.SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. No. 66. Argued Oct. 18, 19, 1967. Decided Dec. 18, 1967. Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1968. See 390 U.S. 930, 88 S.Ct. 846. William H. Henderson, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Seth M. Hufstedler, Los Angeles, Cal., for […]

389 U.S. 404 389 U.S. 404 88 S.Ct. 523 19 L.Ed.2d 634 Isaac SIMS, Jr.v.GEORGIA. No. 678. Dec. 18, 1967. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Anthony G. Amsterdam and Howard Moore, Jr., for petitioner. PER CURIAM. 1 This case is before us for the second time. Last Term we granted certiorari to consider five […]

389 U.S. 409 389 U.S. 409 88 S.Ct. 539 19 L.Ed.2d 639 UNITED STATES et al.v.DIXIE HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., et al. BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. DIXIE HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., et al. Nos. 694 and 707. Dec. 18, 1967. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and […]

389 U.S. 375 389 U.S. 375 88 S.Ct. 543 19 L.Ed.2d 614 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.FLEETWOOD TRAILER CO., Inc. No. 49. Argued Nov. 8, 1967. Decided Dec. 18, 1967. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hugh J. Scallon, Los Angeles, Cal, for respondent. Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 […]

389 U.S. 332 389 U.S. 332 88 S.Ct. 548 19 L.Ed.2d 564 Alexander TCHEREPNIN et al., Petitioners,v.Joseph E. KNIGHT et al. No. 104. Argued Nov. 13, 1967. Decided Dec. 18, 1967. Arnold I. Shure, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Philip A. Loomis, Jr., Washington, D.C., for the United States, as amicus curiae. Charles J. O’Laughlin, Chicago, […]

389 U.S. 35 389 U.S. 35 88 S.Ct. 189 19 L.Ed.2d 35 Johnny Daniel BEECHERv.ALABAMA. No. 92, Misc. Decided Oct. 23, 1967. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Michael Meltsner, for petitioner. MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen. of Alabama, and Leslie Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 On the morning of June […]

389 U.S. 323 389 U.S. 323 88 S.Ct. 503 19 L.Ed.2d 557 Stephen R. EAGAR et al.v.MAGMA COPPER CO. No. 659. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. December 11, 1967 Rehearing Denied Jan. 15, 1968. See 389 U.S. 1060, 88 S.Ct. 767. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Alan […]

389 U.S. 327 389 U.S. 327 88 S.Ct. 437 19 L.Ed.2d 560 BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN et al.v.BANGOR & AROOSTOOK RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 353. Dec. 11, 1967. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Harriett R. Taylor, Isaac N. Groner, Harold C. Heiss, Donald W. Bennett, Alex Elson, Willard J. Lassers and […]

389 U.S. 329 389 U.S. 329 88 S.Ct. 503 19 L.Ed.2d 559 Walter GERMANNv.UNITED STATES. No. 384. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. December 11, 1967 Louis Bender, Lloyd A. Hale, New York City, of counsel, for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg and Paul […]

389 U.S. 308 389 U.S. 308 88 S.Ct. 502 19 L.Ed.2d 545 UNITED STATES, Appellant,v.PENNOLIN COMPANY et al. No. 26. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. December 11, 1967 Edwin M. Zimmerman for appellant. Albert R. Connelly and H. Francis DeLone for appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 The judgment of the United States […]

389 U.S. 309 389 U.S. 309 88 S.Ct. 450 19 L.Ed.2d 546 W. E. B. DuBOIS CLUBS OF AMERICA et al.v.CLARK et al. No. 515. Decided Dec. 11, 1967. Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1968. See 390 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 814. William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, David Rein, Monroe H. Freedman and […]

389 U.S. 31 389 U.S. 31 88 S.Ct. 192 19 L.Ed.2d 31 Warren PINTO, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison Farmv.Lawrence PIERCE. No. 284. Oct. 23, 1967. Rehearing Denied Dec. 4, 1967. See 389 U.S. 997, 88 S.Ct. 462. Thomas P. Ford, Jr., for petitioner. PER CURIAM. 1 Respondent was indicted by the grand jury of […]

389 U.S. 320 389 U.S. 320 88 S.Ct. 443. 19 L.Ed.2d 554 Kenneth A. BURKE et al.v.Clarence FORD and Kunc et al. No. 632. Decided Dec. 11, 1967. Robert S. Rizley, for petitioners. Irvine E. Ungerman, for respondents. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioners, Oklahoma liquor retailers, brought this action under § 1 of the Sherman Act, […]

389 U.S. 29 389 U.S. 29 88 S.Ct. 106 19 L.Ed.2d 29 Joseph P. LORDI, Director of Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, etc.v.Louis J. EPSTEIN et al. No. 322. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1967. October 16, 1967 Arthur J. Sills, Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Asst. Atty. […]

389 U.S. 290 389 U.S. 290 88 S.Ct. 438 19 L.Ed.2d 530 Stella HUGHES, Petitioner,v.STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 15. Argued Nov. 6, 1967. Decided Dec. 11, 1967. Charles B. Welsh, South Bend, Wash., for petitioner. Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Washington, D.C., for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court. Harold T. […]