Category: 1948

335 U.S. 359 335 U.S. 359 69 S.Ct. 114 93 L.Ed. 64 GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITYv.GRAND-HYDRO. No. 6. Argued Oct. 12, 13, 1948. Decided Nov. 22, 1948. Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1948. See 335 U.S. 900, 69 S.Ct. 298. Mr. Howard E. Wahrenbrock, of Washington, D.C., for The United States as amicus curiae. Mr. Robert […]

335 U.S. 355 335 U.S. 355 69 S.Ct. 112 93 L.Ed. 61 UNITED STATESv.URBUTEIT. No. 13. Argued Oct. 13, 14, 1948. Nov. 22, 1948. As Amended Dec. 6, 1948. Messrs. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., Alexander M. Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Philip Elman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and William W. Goodrich […]

335 U.S. 331 335 U.S. 331 69 S.Ct. 85 93 L.Ed. 43 ADKINSv.E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., Inc. No. 1. Argued on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Oct. 18, 1948. Decided Nov. 22, 1948. Mr. John W. Porter, Jr., of Muskogee, Okl., for petitioner. Mr. G. C. Spillers, of […]

335 U.S. 345 335 U.S. 345 69 S.Ct. 106 93 L.Ed. 52 KORDELv.UNITED STATES. No. 30. Argued Oct. 14, 1948. Decided Nov. 22, 1948. Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1948. See 335 U.S. 900, 69 S.Ct. 298. Mr. Arthur D. Herrick, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., […]

335 U.S. 297 335 U.S. 297 69 S.Ct. 70 93 L.Ed. 16 HOINESSv.UNITED STATES. No. 20. Argued Oct. 21, 1948. Decided Nov. 8, 1948. Mr. Herbert Resner, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Mr. Harry I. Rand, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Petitioner was a […]

335 U.S. 303 335 U.S. 303 69 S.Ct. 93 93 L.Ed. 24 FORD MOTOR CO.v.UNITED STATES. COMMERCIAL INV. TRUST CORPORATION et al. v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 1 and 2. Argued Oct. 11, 1948. Decided Nov. 15, 1948. Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Indiana. [Syllabus from pages […]

335 U.S. 329 335 U.S. 329 69 S.Ct. 91 93 L.Ed. 41 ECKENRODEv.PENNSYLVANIA R. CO. No. 28. Argued Oct. 22, 1948. Decided Nov. 15, 1948. Mr. B. Nathaniel Richter, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner. Mr. Owen B. Rhoads, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 This was a suit in the United States District […]

335 U.S. 188 335 U.S. 188 68 S.Ct. 1443 92 L.Ed. 1898 AHRENS et al.v.CLARK, Atty. Gen. No. 446. Argued March 29, 1948. Decided June 21, 1948. Mr. James J. Laughlin, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the […]

335 U.S. 211 335 U.S. 211 68 S.Ct. 1454 92 L.Ed. 1911 COMSTOCKv.GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, etc., et al., and three other cases. Nos. 451 to 454. Argued March 9, 10, 1948. Decided June 21, 1948. Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1948. See 69 S.Ct. 12. Mr. Maxwell Brandwen, of New York City, for petitioners. 1 […]

335 U.S. 252 335 U.S. 252 68 S.Ct. 1415 92 L.Ed. 1935 TAYLORv.STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 721. Argued April 30, May 3, 1948. Decided June 21, 1948. [Syllabus from pages 252-254 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Nesbitt Elmore, of Montgomery, Ala., and Thurgood Marshall, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. Bernard F. Sykes, of Montgomery, Ala., […]

335 U.S. 281 335 U.S. 281 69 S.Ct. 1 93 L.Ed. 3 MacDOUGALL et al.v.GREEN et al. No. 348. Argued Oct. 18, 1948. Decided Oct. 21, 1948. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Messrs. John Abt, of New York City, and Richard F. Watt, […]

335 U.S. 291 335 U.S. 291 69 S.Ct. 73 93 L.Ed. 12 MANDEL BROS., Inc.v.WALLACE. No. 16. Argued Oct. 14, 1948. Decided Nov. 8, 1948. Mr. Leonard S. Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Mr. Charles J. Merriam, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The […]

335 U.S. 1 335 U.S. 1 68 S.Ct. 1375 92 L.Ed. 1787 SHAPIROv.UNITED STATES. No. 49. Argued Oct. 23, 1947. Decided June 21, 1948. Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1948. [Syllabus from pages 1-3 intentionally omitted] Mr. Bernard Tomson, of New York City, for Petitioner. Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondent. […]

335 U.S. 106 335 U.S. 106 68 S.Ct. 1349 92 L.Ed. 1849 UNITED STATESv.CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS et al. No. 695. Argued April 28, 29, 1948. Decided June 21, 1948. Mr. Jesse Climenko, for appellant. Messrs. Charles J. Margiotti, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Lee Pressman, of Washington, D.C., for appellees. Mr. Justice REED delivered the […]

335 U.S. 160 335 U.S. 160 68 S.Ct. 1429 92 L.Ed. 1881 LUDECKEv.WATKINS, District Director of Immigration. No. 723. Argued May 3, 4, 1948. Decided June 21, 1948. Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1948. See 69 S.Ct. 14. Mr. Kurt G. W. Ludecke pro se. Mr. Stanley M. Silverberg, for Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice […]

334 U.S. 856 334 U.S. 856 68 S.Ct. 1520 92 L.Ed. 1777 Ralph M. BOYLES, petitioner,v.Robert H. HUDSPETH, Warden. No. 555, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States June 21, 1948 1 The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org

334 U.S. 742 334 U.S. 742 68 S.Ct. 1294 92 L.Ed. 1694 LICHTER et al.v.UNITED STATES. POWNALL et al. v. UNITED STATES. ALEXANDER WOOL COMBING CO. v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 105, 74, and 95. Argued Nov. 20, 21, 1947. Decided June 14, 1948. Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1948. [Syllabus from pages 742-744 intentionally omitted] Mr. […]

334 U.S. 804 334 U.S. 804 68 S.Ct. 1212 92 L.Ed. 1737 LOFTUSv.PEOPLE OF STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 59. Argued 26, 1948. Decided June 14, 1948. Mr. Henry H. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for petitioner. Mr. William C. Wines, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 By way of an original writ of error […]

334 U.S. 806 334 U.S. 806 68 S.Ct. 1185 92 L.Ed. 1739 HEDGEBETHv.STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 674. Argued April 27, 1948. Decided June 14, 1948. Mr. Wilford L. Whitley, Jr., of Plymouth, N.C., for petitioner pro hac vice by Special leave of Court. Mr. Ralph Moody, of Raleigh, N.C., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 […]

334 U.S. 839 334 U.S. 839 68 S.Ct. 1492 92 L.Ed. 1764 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, petitioner,v.The CEMENT INSTITUTE et al. No. 23. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, petitioner, 1 v. AETNA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY et al. 2 No. 24. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, petitioner, 3 v. 4 CALAVARAS CEMENT COMPANY et al. 5 No. 26. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, […]