280 U.S. 291 280 U.S. 291 50 S.Ct. 89 74 L.Ed. 431 INTERNATIONAL SHOE CO.v.FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. No. 42. Argued Dec. 2, 3, 1929. Decided Jan. 6, 1930. [Syllabus from pages 291-293 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Charles Nagel, J. D. Williamson, and Frank Y. Gladney, all of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Mr. John Lord O’Brian, […]
Category: 1929
280 U.S. 30
280 U.S. 30 280 U.S. 30 50 S.Ct. 9 74 L.Ed. 147 SANITARY REFRIGERATOR CO., Petitioner,v.WINTERS et al. WINTERS et al. v. DENT HARDWARE CO. Nos. 4, 14. Argued April 19-22, 1929. Decided October 14, 1929. [Syllabus from pages 30-32 intentionally omitted] Mr. E. Hayward Fairbanks, of Philadelphia, Pa., for Dent Hardware Co. and Sanitary […]
280 U.S. 327
280 U.S. 327 280 U.S. 327 50 S.Ct. 115 74 L.Ed. 457 BREWSTERv.GAGE, Internal Revenue Collector. No. 61. Argued Dec. 6, 1929. Decided Jan. 6, 1930. Messrs. John W. Davis, of New York City, J. Sawyer Fitch, of Rochester, N. Y., and Gurdon W. Fitch, of Albion, N. Y., for petitioner. [Argument of Counsel from […]
280 U.S. 338
280 U.S. 338 280 U.S. 338 50 S.Ct. 111 74 L.Ed. 463 NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO.v.STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 254. Argued Nov. 25, 1929. Decided Jan. 6, 1930. Messrs. Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Frankland Briggs, of Newark, N. J., for appellant. [Argument of […]
280 U.S. 197
280 U.S. 197 280 U.S. 197 50 S.Ct. 106 74 L.Ed. 368 WABASH RY. CO. et al.v.BARCLAY et al. AUSTIN v. SAME. Nos. 37 and 38. Argued Dec. 2, 1929. Decided Jan. 6, 1930. Messrs. Charles E. Hughes and Winslow S. Pierce, both of New York City, for petitioners Wabash R. Co. and others. Mr. […]
280 U.S. 204
280 U.S. 204 280 U.S. 204 50 S.Ct. 98 74 L.Ed. 371 FARMERS’ LOAN & TRUST CO.v.STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 26. Argued Oct. 30, 1929. Decided Jan. 6, 1930. Messrs. Cleon Headly and George W. Morgan, both of St. Paul, Minn., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from page 205 intentionally omitted] Mr. G. A. Youngquist, […]
280 U.S. 1
280 U.S. 1 280 U.S. 1 50 S.Ct. 5 74 L.Ed. 131 GONZALEZv.ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF MANILA. No. 6. Argued April 8, 9, 1929. Decided Oct. 14, 1929. [Syllabus from pages 1-3 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Howard Thayer Kingsbury and Frederic R. Coudert, both of New York City, for petitioner. [Argument of Counsel from pages 3-5 […]
280 U.S. 102
280 U.S. 102 280 U.S. 102 50 S.Ct. 42 74 L.Ed. 207 CHESAPEAKE & O. RY. CO.v.MIHAS. No. 21. Argued Oct. 24, 1929. Decided Nov. 25, 1929. Mr. David H. Leake, of Richmond, Va., for petitioner. Messrs. Joseph D. Ryan, of Chicago, Ill., and John P. Bramhall, of Washington, D. C., for respondent. Mr. Justice […]
280 U.S. 108
280 U.S. 108 280 U.S. 108 50 S.Ct. 41 74 L.Ed. 212 WICKv.CHELAN ELECTRIC CO. No. 29. Argued Nov. 1, 1929. Decided Nov. 25, 1929. Messrs. Adrien W. Vollmer, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Joseph D. Sullivan, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. Messrs. Edwin C. Matthias, of Seattle, Wash., Thomas Balmer, of Spokane, Wash., and […]
280 U.S. 111
280 U.S. 111 280 U.S. 111 50 S.Ct. 49 74 L.Ed. 217 HERBRINGv.LEE, Insurance Com’r of State of Oregon. No. 17. Argued Oct. 23, 24, 1929. Decided Nov. 25, 1929. Messrs. Thomas MacMahon and Guy E. Kelly, both of Tacoma, Wash., for appellant. Messrs. I. H. Van Winkle and Willis S. Moore, both of Salem, […]
280 U.S. 117
280 U.S. 117 280 U.S. 117 50 S.Ct. 57 74 L.Ed. 221 SILVERv.SILVER. No. 24. Argued Oct. 25, 1929. Decided Nov. 25, 1929. Messrs. Thomas R. Robinson, Arthur B. O’Keefe, David M. Reilly and Herman Levine, all of New Haven, Conn., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from page 118 intentionally omitted] Mr. Wm. L. Hadden, […]
280 U.S. 124
280 U.S. 124 280 U.S. 124 50 S.Ct. 46 74 L.Ed. 226 BROMLEYv.McCAUGHN, Collector of Internal Revenue. No. 27. Argued Oct. 31, 1929. Decided Nov. 25, 1929. Mr. Ira Jewell Williams, of Philadelphia, Pa., for Bromley. [Argument of Counsel from pages 125-129 intentionally omitted] Mr. Charles E. Hughes, Jr., Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., […]
280 U.S. 142
280 U.S. 142 280 U.S. 142 50 S.Ct. 70 74 L.Ed. 233 Ex parte NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO. et al.* No. 21. Submitted Nov. 25, 1929. Decided Dec. 2, 1929. Messrs. Bruce Scott and H. H. Field, both of Chicago, Ill., F. G. Dorety, of St. Paul, Minn., M. S. Gunn, of Helena, Mont., and […]
280 U.S. 145
280 U.S. 145 280 U.S. 145 50 S.Ct. 71 74 L.Ed. 234 RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al.v.LOS ANGELES RY. CORPORATION. No. 60. Argued Oct. 22, 1929. Decided Dec. 2, 1929. [Syllabus from pages 145-147 intentionally omitted] Mr. Arthur T. George, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant commission. Mr. Frederick Von Schrader, of Los Angeles, […]
280 U.S. 168
280 U.S. 168 280 U.S. 168 50 S.Ct. 83 74 L.Ed. 353 HOBBS, Commissioner of Insurance, et al.v.POLLOCK, District Judge. No. 20. Argued Nov. 25, 26, 1929. Decided Dec. 9, 1929. Messrs. John G. Egan and William R. Smith, both of Topeka, Kan., and John F. Rhodes, of Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner. [Argument of […]
280 U.S. 173
280 U.S. 173 280 U.S. 173 50 S.Ct. 148 74 L.Ed. 356 LUCKENBACH S. S. CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 49. Argued Dec. 4, 5, 1929. Decided Jan. 6, 1930. Messrs. George A. King and William B. King, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Sisson, for the United States. [Argument of Counsel […]
280 U.S. 183
280 U.S. 183 280 U.S. 183 50 S.Ct. 143 74 L.Ed. 361 UNITED STATESv.JACKSON et al. No. 57. Argued Dec. 5, 1929. Decided Jan. 6, 1930. In accordance with the provisions of the Act of Congress of July 4, 1884, c. 180, § 1 (23 Stat. 76, 96; 43 U. S. C. 190 (43 USCA […]
279 U.S. 826
279 U.S. 826 279 U.S. 826 49 S.Ct. 515 73 L.Ed. 978 WHEELER LUMBER BRIDGE & SUPPLY CO.v.UNITED STATES INDIAN MOTOCYCLE CO. v. UNITED STATES. No. 571. No. 576. Supreme Court of the United States Argued April 25, 1929. June 3, 1929 and Mr. Jesse I. Miller, of Washington, D. C., for Wheeler Lumber Bridge […]
279 U.S. 95
279 U.S. 95 279 U.S. 95 49 S.Ct. 292 73 L.Ed. 626 CARSON PETROLEUM CO.v.VIAL, Sheriff and Tax Collector, et al. No. 306. Argued Feb. 28, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Messrs. George M. Burditt and John K. Murphy, both of Chicago, Ill., and William E. Leahy, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Mr. Harry […]
279 U.S. 817
279 U.S. 817 279 U.S. 817 49 S.Ct. 264 73 L.Ed. 974 The UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Joseph Wenger, appellant,v.W. Frank MATHUES, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. No. 631. Supreme Court of the United States March 11, 1929 Mr. Joseph Blank, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. Messrs. William D. […]