269 U.S. 314 269 U.S. 314 46 S.Ct. 164 70 L.Ed. 285 STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Complainant,v.STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant (UNITED STATES, Intervener). No. 13. Submitted Dec. 7, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. PER CURIAM. 1 On consideration of the third report of the commissioners, heretofore selected to run, locate and mark portions of the boundary […]
Category: 1925
269 U.S. 315
269 U.S. 315 269 U.S. 315 46 S.Ct. 148 70 L.Ed. 285 UNITED STATESv.ROBBINS et al. No. 493. Argued Dec. 7, 8, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., and Robert P. Reeder, both of Washington, D. C., for the United States. [Argument of Counsel from pages 316-321 intentionally omitted] Messrs. […]
269 U.S. 190
269 U.S. 190 269 U.S. 190 46 S.Ct. 90 70 L.Ed. 229 CENTRAL UNION TELEPHONE CO.v.CITY OF EDWARDSVILLE. No. 37. Argued Oct. 13, 1925. Decided Nov. 23, 1925. Messrs. Wm. D. Bangs and Nathan G. Moore, both of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from page 191 intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice […]
269 U.S. 197
269 U.S. 197 269 U.S. 197 46 S.Ct. 97 70 L.Ed. 232 UNITED STATESv.BOSTON INS. CO. No. 29. Argued Oct. 9, 1925. Decided Nov. 23, 1925. Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, and The Attorney General, for the United States. Mr. Abram R. Serven, of Washington, D. C., for appellee. Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS […]
269 U.S. 20
269 U.S. 20 269 U.S. 20 46 S.Ct. 4 70 L.Ed. 145 AGNELLO et al.v.UNITED STATES. No. 6. Argued April 23, 1925. Decided October 12, 1925. Messrs. Battle, Vandiver, Levy & Van Tine, of New York City (Messrs. George Gordon Battle and Isaac H. Levy, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners. [Argument […]
269 U.S. 204
269 U.S. 204 269 U.S. 204 46 S.Ct. 85 70 L.Ed. 235 EDWARDS, Collector of Internal Revenue,v.DOUGLAS et al. No. 129. Argued April 17, 1925. Decided Nov. 23, 1925. Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, and the Attorney General, for petitioner. Messrs. Matthew C. Fleming and Paul Armitage, both of New York City, […]
269 U.S. 140
269 U.S. 140 269 U.S. 140 46 S.Ct. 69 70 L.Ed. 200 ANDERSONv.CLUNE. No. 331. Submitted Oct. 5, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Mr. Burgess W. Marshall, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 In 1872, A. K. Johnson, an honorably discharged soldier of the Civil […]
269 U.S. 144
269 U.S. 144 269 U.S. 144 46 S.Ct. 37 70 L.Ed. 202 STILZv.UNITED STATES. No. 38. Argued Oct. 13 and 14, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Mr. Harry B. Stilz, pro se. Mr. John W. Loveland, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States. Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the court. 1 Plaintiff […]
269 U.S. 148
269 U.S. 148 269 U.S. 148 46 S.Ct. 59 70 L.Ed. 204 KANSAS CITY STRUCTURAL STEEL CO.v.STATE OF ARKANSAS, for Use and Benefit of ASHLEY COUNTY. No. 54. Submitted Oct. 15, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Armwell L. Cooper, or Kansas City, Mo., and Charles T. Coleman and J. W. House, Jr., both of […]
269 U.S. 152
269 U.S. 152 269 U.S. 152 46 S.Ct. 31 70 L.Ed. 206 STATE OF ARKANSASv.STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 2, Original. Argued on Exceptions to Commissioners’ Report. Oct. 5, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Mr. Caruthers Ewing, of Memphis, Tenn., for complainant. Messrs. Guston T. Fitzhugh, of Memphis, Tenn., Charles T. Cates, Jr., of Knoxville, Tenn., […]
269 U.S. 158
269 U.S. 158 269 U.S. 158 46 S.Ct. 28 70 L.Ed. 209 DAVIS, Director General,v.JOHN L. ROPER LUMBER CO. No. 79. Submitted Oct. 21, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. A. A. McLaughlin, of Washington, D. C., and R. M. Hughes, Jr., of Norfolk, Va., for petitioner. Mr. C. M. Bain, of Norfolk, Va., for […]
269 U.S. 163
269 U.S. 163 269 U.S. 163 46 S.Ct. 50 70 L.Ed. 213 STEPHENSON et al.v.KIRTLEY et al. No. 58. Submitted Oct. 16, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Edward W. Knight and Harold A. Ritz, both of Charleston, W. Va., for appellants. Mr. J. H. McClintic, of Charleston, W. Va., for appellees. Mr. Justice SANFORD […]
269 U.S. 167
269 U.S. 167 269 U.S. 167 46 S.Ct. 68 70 L.Ed. 216 BEAZELLv.STATE OF OHIO et al. CHATFIELD v. SAME. Nos. 247, 248. Submitted on Motion to Dismiss or Affirm Oct. 5, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Province M. Pogue and Harry M. Hoffheimer, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error Beazell. Mr. […]
269 U.S. 172
269 U.S. 172 269 U.S. 172 46 S.Ct. 66 70 L.Ed. 219 STATE OF ARKANSAS ex rel. UTLEY, Atty. Gen., for Use and Benefit of CRAIGHEAD COUNTY, ARK.,v.ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY. CO. et al. No. 74. Argued and Submitted Oct. 22, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Horace Sloan, of Jonesboro, Ark., and J. S. […]
269 U.S. 177
269 U.S. 177 269 U.S. 177 46 S.Ct. 42 70 L.Ed. 222 CONCRETE APPLIANCES CO. et al.v.GOMERY et al. No. 44. Argued Oct. 14-15, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Mr. Stephen J. Cox, of New York City, for petitioners. Mr. George Bayard Jones, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents. Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of […]
269 U.S. 186
269 U.S. 186 269 U.S. 186 46 S.Ct. 71 70 L.Ed. 227 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC CO. STODDARD, STODDARD. Superintendent of Insurance of New York. No. 42. Submitted Oct. 14, 1925. Decided Nov. 23, 1925. Messrs. Arthur F. Gotthold, of New York City, Thomas M. Fields and Frank J. Hogan, both of Washington, D. C., and Walter […]
269 U.S. 110
269 U.S. 110 269 U.S. 110 46 S.Ct. 48 70 L.Ed. 183 BURK-WAGGONER OIL ASS’Nv.HOPKINS, Collector of Internal Revenue. No. 67. Argued Oct. 20, 21, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tex., and Arnold R. Baar, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New […]
269 U.S. 114
269 U.S. 114 269 U.S. 114 46 S.Ct. 34 70 L.Ed. 186 DAVIS, Agent, etc.,v.ALEXANDER et al. No. 32. Argued and Submitted Oct. 12, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Wm. F. Collins, of El Reno, Okl., and T. P. Littlepage, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Mr. Fred E. Suits, of Oklahoma City, Okl., […]
269 U.S. 118
269 U.S. 118 269 U.S. 118 46 S.Ct. 29 70 L.Ed. 187 HICKS, Alien Property Custodian, et al.v.POE et al. No. 34. Argued Oct. 12 and 13, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Daniel O. Hastings, of Wilmington, Del., Hartwell Cabel, of New York City, and the Attorney General, for appellants. Messrs. Stuart S. Janney […]
269 U.S. 121
269 U.S. 121 269 U.S. 121 46 S.Ct. 41 70 L.Ed. 193 FRESHMANv.ATKINS. No. 41. Argued Oct. 14, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Paul Carrington and Joseph Manson McCormick, both of Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 On November 1, 1915, the petitioner filed in the […]