Category: 1925

269 U.S. 36 269 U.S. 36 46 S.Ct. 14 70 L.Ed. 151 DRUGGANv.ANDERSON, U. S. Marshal, et al. No. 415. Argued Oct. 5, 6, 1925. Decided Oct. 19, 1925. Messrs. Michael J. Ahern and Thomas D. Nash, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from page 37 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered […]

269 U.S. 360 269 U.S. 360 46 S.Ct. 156 70 L.Ed. 309 UNITED STATESv.DAUGHERTY. No. 303. Argued Dec. 1, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for the United States. Mr. Anthony P. Nugent, of Kansas City, Mo., for respondent. Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 An indictment […]

269 U.S. 364 269 U.S. 364 46 S.Ct. 157 70 L.Ed. 313 O’HARA et al.v.LUCKENBACH S. S. CO. No. 224. Argued Nov. 19, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Mr. H. W. Hutton, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. Mr. Peter S. Carter, of New York City, for respondent. Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of […]

269 U.S. 250 269 U.S. 250 46 S.Ct. 92 70 L.Ed. 259 WORK, Secretary of the Interior,v.STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 5. Argued Oct. 6, 1925. Decided Nov. 23, 1925. Mr. Harry L. Underwood, of Washington, D. C., and the Attorney General, for appellant. Messrs. S. L. Herold, of Shreveport, La., and F. W. Clements, of […]

269 U.S. 372 269 U.S. 372 46 S.Ct. 160 70 L.Ed. 317 AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIESv.ROBERTSON, Commissioner of Patents, et al. No. 156. Argued Nov. 16 and 17, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Mr. George L. Wilkinson, of Chicago, Ill., for American Steel foundries. Messrs. Nathan Heard and Frederick A. Tennant, both of Boston, Mass., for […]

269 U.S. 385 269 U.S. 385 46 S.Ct. 126 70 L.Ed. 322 CONNALLY, Commissioner of Labor of Oklahoma, et al.v.GENERAL CONST. CO. No. 314. Argued Nov. 30 and Dec. 1, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. George F. Short, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and J. Berry King, of Muskogee, Okl., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel […]

269 U.S. 396 269 U.S. 396 46 S.Ct. 141 70 L.Ed. 330 BROWNING et al.v.HOOPER et al. No. 256. Argued Nov. 17, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. Wm. R. Watkins, of Fort Worth, Tex., and C. K. Walsh, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from page 397 intentionally omitted] Mr. John […]

269 U.S. 40 269 U.S. 40 46 S.Ct. 15 70 L.Ed. 154 AMERICAN RY. EXPRESS CO.v.DANIEL. No. 53. Argued Oct. 16, 1925. Decided Oct. 26, 1925. Messrs. Blair Foster and Robert C. Alston, both of Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This is a suit against the […]

269 U.S. 406 269 U.S. 406 46 S.Ct. 129 70 L.Ed. 335 MINNEAPOLIS, ST. P. & S. S. M. RY. CO.v.GONEAU. No. 76. Argued Dec. 3, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. J. E. Palmer, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Marshall A. Spooner, of Bimidji, Minn., for petitioner. Mr. Samuel A. Anderson, of St. Paul, Minn., […]

269 U.S. 411 269 U.S. 411 46 S.Ct. 144 70 L.Ed. 339 UNITED STATESv.RIVER ROUGE IMPROVEMENT CO. et al. No. 3. Argued March 10 and 11, 1924. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. The Attorney General and Messrs. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of New York City, and Alfred Lucking, of Detroit, Mich., for the United States. […]

269 U.S. 314 269 U.S. 314 46 S.Ct. 164 70 L.Ed. 285 STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Complainant,v.STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant (UNITED STATES, Intervener). No. 13. Submitted Dec. 7, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. PER CURIAM. 1 On consideration of the third report of the commissioners, heretofore selected to run, locate and mark portions of the boundary […]

269 U.S. 315 269 U.S. 315 46 S.Ct. 148 70 L.Ed. 285 UNITED STATESv.ROBBINS et al. No. 493. Argued Dec. 7, 8, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., and Robert P. Reeder, both of Washington, D. C., for the United States. [Argument of Counsel from pages 316-321 intentionally omitted] Messrs. […]

269 U.S. 328 269 U.S. 328 46 S.Ct. 122 70 L.Ed. 289 STATE OF NEW JERSEYv.SARGENT, Atty. Gen., et al. No. 20, Original. Submitted Oct. 5, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. Thomas F. McCran, of Paterson, N. J., William Newcorn, of Plainfield, N. J., and Harry R. Coulomb, of Atlantic City, N. J., for […]

269 U.S. 217 269 U.S. 217 46 S.Ct. 73 70 L.Ed. 242 LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO.v.SLOSS-SHEFFIELD STEEL & IRON CO. No. 25. Argued April 23, 1925. Decided Nov. 23, 1925. [Syllabus from pages 217-219 intentionally omitted] Messrs. E. P. Thomas, of Montgomery, Ala., and Charles J. Rixey, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in […]

269 U.S. 244 269 U.S. 244 46 S.Ct. 83 70 L.Ed. 255 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. WOODHAVEN GASLIGHT CO.v.PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK. No. 33. Argued Oct. 12, 1925. Decided Nov. 23, 1925. Messrs. Jackson A. Dykman and William N. Dykman, both of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff in […]

269 U.S. 262 269 U.S. 262 46 S.Ct. 108 70 L.Ed. 266 MATTHEWSv.HUWE, County Treasurer (two cases). Nos. 39, 40. Submitted Oct. 12, 1925. Decided Nov. 30, 1925. Mr. Mortimer Mattews, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Charles S. Bell, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error. Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the […]

269 U.S. 266 269 U.S. 266 46 S.Ct. 109 70 L.Ed. 268 ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 273. Argued Nov. 19, 20. 1925. Decided Nov. 30, 1925. Messrs. Edward C. Craig and Homer W. Davis, both of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Mr. Blackburn Esterline, of Chicago, Ill., and the Attorney General, […]

269 U.S. 269 269 U.S. 269 46 S.Ct. 110 70 L.Ed. 270 PACIFIC AMERICAN FISHERIESv.TERRITORY OF ALASKA. No. 246. Argued Nov. 24, 1925. Decided Dec. 7, 1925. Messrs. Warren Gregory, of San Francisco, Cal., E. S. McCord, of Seattle, Wash., and R. E. Robertson, of Juneau, Alaska, for petitioner. 1 [Argument of Counsel from pages […]

269 U.S. 278 269 U.S. 278 46 S.Ct. 112 70 L.Ed. 273 HENDERSON WATER CO.v.CORPORATION COMMISSION OF STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al. No. 249. Argued Nov. 18, 1925. Decided Dec. 14, 1925. Mr. J. H. Bridgers, of Henderson, N. C., for appellant. Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This […]

269 U.S. 283 269 U.S. 283 46 S.Ct. 116 70 L.Ed. 275 WHITE, Treasurer of the United States, et al.v.MECHANICS’ SECURITIES CORPORATION.* UNITED STATES v. SECURITIES CORPORATION GENERAL. WHITE, Treasurer of the United States, et al. v. SAME. UNITED STATES v. EQUITABLE TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK. HICKS, Alien Property Custodian, et al. v. SAME. […]