Category: 1925

269 U.S. 82 269 U.S. 82 46 S.Ct. 57 70 L.Ed. 172 DEL POZO et al.v.WILSON CYPRESS CO. No. 184. Submitted on Motion to Dismiss Oct. 5, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. [Syllabus from pages 82-84 intentionally omitted] Messrs. W. W. Dewhurst, of St. Augustine, Fla., and John C. Jones and Joseph H. Jones, both […]

269 U.S. 90 269 U.S. 90 46 S.Ct. 45 70 L.Ed. 175 LIPSHITZ & COHENv.UNITED STATES. No. 68. Argued Oct. 21, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Mr. Henry A. Alexander, of Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Plaintiffs in error seek to recover profits which, […]

269 U.S. 93 269 U.S. 93 46 S.Ct. 64 70 L.Ed. 176 MARGOLINv.UNITED STATES. No. 254. Argued Oct. 5, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Act Sept. 2, 1914, § 13, as added by Act Oct. 6, 1917, § 2, and amended by Act May 20, 1918, § 1 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. […]

269 U.S. 55 269 U.S. 55 46 S.Ct. 39 70 L.Ed. 162 OLD DOMINION LAND CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 55. Argued Oct. 16, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. J. Winston Read, of Newport News, Va., Thomas H. Willcox, of Norfolk, Va., and R. G. Bickford, of Newport News, Va., for plaintiff in error. [Argument of […]

269 U.S. 566 269 U.S. 566 46 S.Ct. 24 70 L.Ed. 415 The FISHERIES PRODUCTS COMPANY et al., Receivers of The Fisheries Products Company, petitioners,v.ABRAHAM S. SEE & DEPEW, Inc.* No. 644. Supreme Court of the United States October 19, 1925 Mr. T. D. Warren, of Newbern, N. C., for petitioners. 1 Petition for a […]

269 U.S. 67 269 U.S. 67 46 S.Ct. 36 70 L.Ed. 166 WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO.v.STATE OF GEORGIA et al. No. 24. Argued Oct. 9, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. John G. Milburn and Francis Raymond Stark, both of New York City, and William L. Clay, of Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff in error. […]

269 U.S. 71 269 U.S. 71 46 S.Ct. 46 70 L.Ed. 168 HICKS, Alien Property Custodian, et al.v.GUINNESS et al. GUINNESS et al. v. HICKS, Alien Property Custodian et al. Nos. 80, 81. Argued Oct. 22 and 23, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Mr. Alexander B. Siegel, of New York City, for Guinness and others. […]

269 U.S. 42 269 U.S. 42 46 S.Ct. 61 70 L.Ed. 155 BUCKEYE COAL & RY. CO. et al.v.HOCKING VALLEY RY. CO. et al. No 51. Argued Oct. 15, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Messrs. Wm. O. Henderson, for Columbus, Ohio, and Wm. Burry, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants. Messrs. John F. Wilson, of Columbus, […]

269 U.S. 422 269 U.S. 422 46 S.Ct. 131 70 L.Ed. 347 UNITED STATESv.ANDERSON et al. SAME v. YALE & TOWNE MFG. CO. Nos. 337, 420. Argued Nov. 20, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. The Attorney General and Mr. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States. [Argument of Counsel […]

269 U.S. 443 269 U.S. 443 46 S.Ct. 152 70 L.Ed. 352 PROVOST et al.v.UNITED STATES. No. 258. Argued Nov. 18, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. [Syllabus from pages 443-445 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, Samuel P. Goldman, and William F. Unger, all of New York City, for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from pages […]

269 U.S. 459 269 U.S. 459 46 S.Ct. 166 70 L.Ed. 357 INDEPENDENT WIRELESS TELEGRAPH CO.v.RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA. No. 87. Argued Oct. 23, 1925. Decided Jan. 11, 1926. Mr. Wm. H. Davis, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. John W. Davis, of New York City, for respondent. Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the […]

269 U.S. 475 269 U.S. 475 46 S.Ct. 165 70 L.Ed. 365 TRUSLERv.CROOKS et al. No. 188. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1925. Decided Jan. 11, 1926. Mr. E. R. Morrison, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from page 476 intentionally omitted] Messrs. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., and Robert […]

269 U.S. 483 269 U.S. 483 46 S.Ct. 176 70 L.Ed. 368 BRAMWELL, Superintendent of Banks of Oregon,v.UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. No. 192. Argued Nov. 23, 1925. Decided Jan. 11, 1926. Messrs. J. P. Kavanaugh and William M. Cake, both of Portland, Or., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from page 484 intentionally omitted] […]

269 U.S. 49 269 U.S. 49 46 S.Ct. 55 70 L.Ed. 159 DONEGANv.DYSON, United States Marshal. No. 185. Submitted on Motion to Dismiss or Affirm Oct. 5, 1925. Decided Nov. 16, 1925. Mr. W. M. Toomer, of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant. Messrs. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., and Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for appellee. Mr. […]

269 U.S. 492 269 U.S. 492 46 S.Ct. 180 70 L.Ed. 373 PRICEv.UNITED STATES. No. 454. Argued Nov. 23, 1925. Decided Jan. 11, 1926. Mr. Godfrey Goldmark, of New York City, for petitioner. [Argument of Counsel from pages 493-494 intentionally omitted] Messrs. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Jerome Michael and […]

269 U.S. 503 269 U.S. 503 46 S.Ct. 182 70 L.Ed. 379 Frank E. STRIPE et al., as Receivers of Johnson Shipyards Corporation, Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES. No. 496. Submitted Nov. 23, 1925. Decided Jan. 11, 1926. Messrs. Ben A Matthews and Harold Harper, both of New York City, for petitioners. Messrs. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., […]

269 U.S. 504 269 U.S. 504 46 S.Ct. 179 70 L.Ed. 380 UNITED STATESv.BUTTERWORTH-JUDSON CORPORATION. No. 503. Argued Nov. 23, 1925. Decided Jan. 11, 1926. Mr. Wm. Marshall Bullitt, of Louisville, Ky., for the United states. [Argument of Counsel from pages 504-509 intentionally omitted] Messrs. H. G. Pickering, Eldon Bisbee, and Bertram F. Shipman, all […]

269 U.S. 514 269 U.S. 514 46 S.Ct. 172 70 L.Ed. 384 METCALF & EDDYv.MITCHELL. MITCHELL v. METCALF & EDDY. Nos. 183, 376. Argued Nov. 30, 1925. Decided Jan. 11, 1926. Mr. Philip Nichols, of Boston, Mass., for Metcalf and others. [Argument of Counsel from pages 515-517 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Assistant Attorney General Letts and […]

269 U.S. 385 269 U.S. 385 46 S.Ct. 126 70 L.Ed. 322 CONNALLY, Commissioner of Labor of Oklahoma, et al.v.GENERAL CONST. CO. No. 314. Argued Nov. 30 and Dec. 1, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. George F. Short, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and J. Berry King, of Muskogee, Okl., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel […]

269 U.S. 396 269 U.S. 396 46 S.Ct. 141 70 L.Ed. 330 BROWNING et al.v.HOOPER et al. No. 256. Argued Nov. 17, 1925. Decided Jan. 4, 1926. Messrs. Wm. R. Watkins, of Fort Worth, Tex., and C. K. Walsh, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from page 397 intentionally omitted] Mr. John […]