266 U.S. 593 266 U.S. 593 45 S.Ct. 197 69 L.Ed. 458 George F. SHAFER, as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota, et al., appellants,v.FARMERS’ GRAIN COMPANY OF EMBDEN et al. No. 34. Supreme Court of the United States January 5, 1925 1 Messrs. Seth W. Richardson, of Fargo, N. D., and John […]
Category: 1924
266 U.S. 71
266 U.S. 71 266 U.S. 71 45 S.Ct. 12 69 L.Ed. 169 AIR-WAY ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CORPORATIONv.DAY, State Treasurer of Ohio, et al. DAY, State Treasurer of Ohio, et al. v. AIRWAY ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CORPORATION. Nos. 31 and 32. Argued April 30 and May 1, 1924. Decided Oct. 20, 1924. Messrs. Newton A. Tracy, Thomas H. […]
266 U.S. 85
266 U.S. 85 266 U.S. 85 45 S.Ct. 22 69 L.Ed. 178 TWIN FALLS SALMON RIVER LAND & WATER CO. et al.v.CALDWELL et al. No. 8. Argued March 3, 1924. Decided Oct. 27, 1924. Oliver O. Haga and James H. Richards, both of Boise, Idaho, for appellants. [Syllabus from page 86 intentionally omitted] James R. […]
266 U.S. 92
266 U.S. 92 266 U.S. 92 45 S.Ct. 24 69 L.Ed. 182 DAVISv.HENDERSON. No. 44. Submitted Oct. 8, 1924. Decided Oct. 27, 1924. Messrs. A. A. McLaughlin, of Washington, D. C., Thomas B. Pryor and Vincent M. Miles, both of Ft. Smith, Ark., and Sidney F. Andrews, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error […]
266 U.S. 94
266 U.S. 94 266 U.S. 94 45 S.Ct. 55 69 L.Ed. 183 CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RY. CO.v.KENDALL, Governor of lowa, et al. CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO. v. SAME. Nos. 22, 23. Argued Oct. 7, 1924. Decided Nov. 17, 1924. Messrs. Donald Evans, of Des Moines, Iowa, and Thos. P. Littlepage, of Washington, […]
266 U.S. 531
266 U.S. 531 266 U.S. 531 45 S.Ct. 173 69 L.Ed. 425 UNITED STATESv.MORROW. No. 98. Argued Oct. 21, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. The Attorney General and Mr. Merrill E. Otis, of St. Joseph, Mo., for the United States. Mr. George A. King, of Washington, D. C., for appellee. Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the […]
266 U.S. 537
266 U.S. 537 266 U.S. 537 45 S.Ct. 158 69 L.Ed. 428 KUNHARDT & CO., Inc.,v.UNITED STATES No. 141. Argued Dec. 10, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Mr. Raymond M. Hudson, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. The Attorney General, for the United States. Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This […]
266 U.S. 541
266 U.S. 541 266 U.S. 541 45 S.Ct. 155 69 L.Ed. 430 L. RICHARDSON & CO., Inc.,v.UNITED STATES. No. 142. Argued Dec. 10, 11, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Mr. Raymond M. Hudson, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for the United States. […]
266 U.S. 546
266 U.S. 546 266 U.S. 546 45 S.Ct. 195 69 L.Ed. 434 STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Complainant,v.STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant (United States, Intervener). No. 13. Supreme Court of the United States January 5, 1925 1 Mr. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for the State of Oklahoma. 2 Messrs. C. W. Taylor, of Corsicana, Tex., […]
266 U.S. 547
266 U.S. 547 266 U.S. 547 45 S.Ct. 193 69 L.Ed. 195 TOD, Commissioner,v.WALDMAN et al. No. 95. Supreme Court of the United States Argued Dec. 12, 1924. January 12, 1925 The Attorney General, for petitioner. Max J. Kohler, of New York City, for respondent. Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court. […]
266 U.S. 548
266 U.S. 548 266 U.S. 548 45 S.Ct. 188 69 L.Ed. 435 EBERT et al.v.POSTON. No. 153. Argued Dec. 12, 1924. Decided January 12, 1925. Messrs. E. H. Groefsema and P. J. M. Hally, both of Detroit, Mich., for petitioners. Mrs. Regene Freund Cohane and Mr. Louis Starfield Cohane, both of Detroit, Mich., for respondent. […]
266 U.S. 555
266 U.S. 555 266 U.S. 555 45 S.Ct. 184 69 L.Ed. 439 OZARK PIPE LINE CORPORATIONv.MONIER et al. No. 181. Argued Nov. 26, 1924. Decided Jan. 12, 1925. Messrs. Truman Post Young and John H. Carroll, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from pages 556-557 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Jesse W. Barrett […]
266 U.S. 570
266 U.S. 570 266 U.S. 570 45 S.Ct. 191 69 L.Ed. 445 MICHIGAN PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION et al.v.DUKE. No. 283. Argued and Submitted Nov. 21, 1924. Decided Jan. 12, 1925. Mr. H. E. Spalding, of Detroit, Mich., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from pages 571-572 intentionally omitted] Missrs. Hal H. Smith and Percy J. Donovan, […]
266 U.S. 491
266 U.S. 491 266 U.S. 491 45 S.Ct. 182 69 L.Ed. 399 UNITED STATES BEDDING CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 143. Argued Dec. 11, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Mr. Raymond M. Hudson, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for the United States. Mr. Justice […]
266 U.S. 494
266 U.S. 494 266 U.S. 494 45 S.Ct. 175 69 L.Ed. 401 LAWv.UNITED STATES. No. 550. Argued Dec. 8, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Mr. De Witt T. Law, of Missoula, Mont., for plaintiff in error pro hac vice. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for the United States. Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of […]
266 U.S. 497
266 U.S. 497 266 U.S. 497 45 S.Ct. 141 69 L.Ed. 402 HYGRADE PROVISION CO., Inc., et al.v.SHERMAN, Atty. Gen. of New York, et al. LEWIS & FOX CO. v. SAME. SATZ v. SAME. Nos. 104, 105, and 106. Argued Nov. 20 and 21, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Mr. David L. Podell, of New […]
266 U.S. 503
266 U.S. 503 266 U.S. 503 45 S.Ct. 144 69 L.Ed. 408 FARMERS’ & MECHANICS’ NAT. BANKv.WILKINSON.* No. 487. Submitted on Motion to Dismiss Oct. 6, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Mr. Mark McMahon, of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee. Mr. Charles A. Boynton, of Waco, Tex., for appellant. Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion […]
266 U.S. 507
266 U.S. 507 266 U.S. 507 45 S.Ct. 148 69 L.Ed. 411 WEBSTERv.FALL, Secretary of the Interior, et al. No. 149. Argued Dec. 11, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Mr. Preston A. Shinn, of Pawhuska, Okl., for appellant. The Attorney General, for appellees. [Argument of Counsel from page 508 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered […]
266 U.S. 511
266 U.S. 511 266 U.S. 511 45 S.Ct. 145 69 L.Ed. 413 NORTON et al.v.LARNEY et al. No. 146. Submitted Dec. 8, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Messrs. Nathan A. Gibson and Joseph L. Hull, both of Muskogee, Okl., for appellants. Mr. Elias J. Van Court, of Eufaula, Okl., for appellees. [Argument of Counsel from […]
266 U.S. 518
266 U.S. 518 266 U.S. 518 45 S.Ct. 181 69 L.Ed. 417 ERIE COAL & COKE CORPORATIONv.UNITED STATES. No. 78. Argued Oct. 15, 16, 1924. Decided Jan. 5, 1925. Messrs. John S. Wise, Jr., and Walter John King, both of New York City, for appellant. The Attorney General, for the United States. Mr. Justice BUTLER […]