Category: 1923

263 U.S. 197 263 U.S. 197 44 S.Ct. 15 68 L.Ed. 255 TERRACE et al.v.THOMPSON, Attorney General of Washington. No. 29. Argued April 23, 24, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. James B. Howe, of Seattle, Wash., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from pages 198-204 intentionally omitted] Mr. Lindsay L. Thompson, of Olympia, Wash., for […]

263 U.S. 22 263 U.S. 22 44 S.Ct. 13 68 L.Ed. 143 DAVIS, Director General of Railroads,v.WECHSLER. No. 70. Argued Oct. 12, 1923. Decided Oct. 22, 1923. Messrs. Roy B. Thomson, H. M. Langworthy, and O. H. Dean, all of Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner. Messrs. W. S. Hogsett and Mont T. Prewitt, both of […]

263 U.S. 225 263 U.S. 225 44 S.Ct. 21 68 L.Ed. 278 PORTERFIELD et al.v.WEBB, Attorney General of California, et al. No. 28. Argued April 23, 24, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Louis Marshall, of New York City, for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from pages 225-227 intentionally omitted] Mr. U. S. Webb, of San […]

263 U.S. 234 263 U.S. 234 44 S.Ct. 50 68 L.Ed. 282 McGREGORv.HOGAN, Sheriff, et al. No. 58. Argued Oct. 9, 1923. Decided. Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. L. D. McGregor, of Warrenton, Ga., for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. P. Davis, of Warrenton, Ga., for defendants in error. Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of […]

263 U.S. 143 263 U.S. 143 44 S.Ct. 72 68 L.Ed. 216 EDWARD HINES YELLOW PINE TRUSTEES et al.v.UNITED STATES et al. No. 91. Argued Oct. 18-19, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Wm. S. Bennet, of New York City, for appellants. Mr. Blackburn Esterline, of Washington, D. C., for the United States. Mr. P. […]

263 U.S. 15 263 U.S. 15 44 S.Ct. 10 68 L.Ed. 137 UNITED STATESv.WALTER. No. 20. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1923. Decided Oct. 22, 1923. Mr. Solicitor General James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United States. Mr. John W. Dodge, of Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered […]

263 U.S. 158 263 U.S. 158 44 S.Ct. 59 68 L.Ed. 226 DAVIS, Agent of the President, etc.,v.SLOCOMB. No. 530. Submitted on Motion to Dismiss Oct. 1, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Arthur E. Griffin, of Seattle, Wash., for defendant in error. Messrs. F. G. Dorety, of St. Paul, Minn., and Edwin C. Matthias, […]

263 U.S. 162 263 U.S. 162 44 S.Ct. 62 68 L.Ed. 228 BUTTERS et al.v.CITY OF OAKLAND No. 16. Submitted Oct. 3, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Messrs. C. Irving Wright and J. E. Manders, both of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in error. Mr. James A. Johnson, of Oakland, Cal., for defendants in error. […]

263 U.S. 167 263 U.S. 167 44 S.Ct. 90 68 L.Ed. 235 MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORKv.HURNI PACKING CO. No. 66. Argued Oct. 11, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. [Argument of Counsel from pages 167-173 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Charles M. Stilwill and Edwin […]

263 U.S. 179 263 U.S. 179 44 S.Ct. 69 68 L.Ed. 240 UNITED STATESv.MERRIAM. SAME v. ANDERSON. Nos. 67, 68. Argued Oct. 11, 12, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United states. [Argument of Counsel from pages 179-181 intentionally omitted] Mr. Roy C. Gasser, of New […]

263 U.S. 188 263 U.S. 188 44 S.Ct. 58 68 L.Ed. 244 KLEBE et al.v.UNITED STATES. No. 78. Argued Oct. 16 and 17, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Daniel C. Donoghue, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Ottinger, for the United States. Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court. […]

263 U.S. 19 263 U.S. 19 44 S.Ct. 11 68 L.Ed. 140 AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS CO.v.LEVEE. No. 54. Argued Oct. 8, 1923. Decided Oct. 22, 1923. Messrs. A. A. Moreno, H. Garland Dupre, and Hunter C. Leake, all of New Orleans, La., and A. M. Hartung, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. Charles T. […]

263 U.S. 193 263 U.S. 193 44 S.Ct. 43 68 L.Ed. 247 ANDERSON, Warden,v.CORALL. No. 44. Argued Oct. 4, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 On November 25, 1914, Corall was convicted of the crime of […]

263 U.S. 125 263 U.S. 125 44 S.Ct. 82 68 L.Ed. 204 SUPERIOR WATER, LIGHT & POWER CO.v.CITY OF SUPERIOR et al. No. 57. Argued Oct. 9, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Frank B. Kellogg, of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Louis Hanitch and T. L. McIntosh, both of Superior, Wis., […]

263 U.S. 137 263 U.S. 137 44 S.Ct. 40 68 L.Ed. 212 BAKER et al.v.DRUESEDOW, Collector, et al. No. 12. Argued Oct. 2, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Samuel B. Dabney, of Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs in error. Mr. W. A. Keeling, of Mexia, Tex., for defendants in error. Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the […]

263 U.S. 14 263 U.S. 14 44 S.Ct. 10 68 L.Ed. 136 WYMANv.UNITED STATES. No. 140. Supreme Court of the United States Argued Oct. 4, 1923. October 22, 1923 Messrs. Otho S. Bowling, of New York City, and Robert H. Elder, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General, for the United States. […]

263 U.S. 1 263 U.S. 1 44 S.Ct. 1 68 L.Ed. 131 FRESEv.CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO. No. 27. Argued Oct. 3, 1923. Decided Oct. 15, 1923. Mr. John G. Parkinson, of St. Joseph, Mo., for petitioner. Mr. M. G. Roberts, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of […]

263 U.S. 100 263 U.S. 100 44 S.Ct. 31 68 L.Ed. 189 HEYERv.DUPLICATOR MFG. CO. No. 75. Argued Oct. 15 and 16, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Samuel W. Banning, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. George L. Wilkinson, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This is […]

263 U.S. 103 263 U.S. 103 44 S.Ct. 23 68 L.Ed. 191 DES MOINES NAT. BANKv.FAIRWEATHER et al. No. 17. Argued Oct. 3, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. J. G. Gamble, of Des Moines, Iowa, for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Ben J. Gibson and John J. Halloran, both of Des Moines, Iowa, for defendants […]

263 U.S. 119 263 U.S. 119 44 S.Ct. 30 68 L.Ed. 201 ST. JOHNS N. F. SHIPPING CORPORATIONv.S. A. COMPANHIA GERAL COMMERCIAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. No. 43. Argued Oct. 4, 1923. Decided Nov. 12, 1923. Mr. Clarence Bishop Smith, of New York City, for petitioner. [Argument of Counsel from pages 119-121 intentionally omitted] Mr. […]