Category: 1922

260 U.S. 166 260 U.S. 166 43 S.Ct. 28 67 L.Ed. 189 BALTIMORE & O. S. W. R. CO.v.SETTLE et al. No. 83. Argued and Submitted Oct. 20, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. Geo. Hoadley, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harry C. Barnes, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error. Mr. […]

260 U.S. 174 260 U.S. 174 43 S.Ct. 24 67 L.Ed. 194 ZUCHTv.KING et al. No. 84. Argued Oct. 20, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. Don A. Bliss, of San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. R. L. Ball and A. W. Seeligson, both of San Antonio, Tex., for defendants in error. Mr. […]

260 U.S. 103 260 U.S. 103 43 S.Ct. 44 67 L.Ed. 153 ORTEGA CO.v.TRIAY. No. 75. Argued Oct. 18, 19, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. Herman Ulmer and W. T. Stockton, both of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant. Messrs. Peter O. Knight, of Tampa, Fla., and J. L. Doggett, of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee. Mr. […]

260 U.S. 115 260 U.S. 115 43 S.Ct. 19 67 L.Ed. 162 DUESENBERG MOTORS CORPORATIONv.UNITED STATES. No. 80. Argued Oct. 19, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. Geo. A. King, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from pages 116-119 intentionally omitted] Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for the United […]

260 U.S. 12 260 U.S. 12 43 S.Ct. 1 67 L.Ed. 102 KNIGHTSv.JACKSON, Treasurer, etc. No. 167. Argued Oct. 3, 1922. Decided Oct. 16, 1922. Mr. Philip Nichols, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 12-14 intentionally omitted] Mr. Edwin H. Abbot, Jr., of Boston, Mass., for defendant in error. […]

260 U.S. 1 260 U.S. 1 43 S.Ct. 2 66 L.Ed. 1026 STATE OF WYOMINGv.STATE OF COLORADO et al. No. 3, Original. Supreme Court of the United States October 9, 1922 PER CURIAM. 1 1. On consideration of the defendants’ petition for a rehearing heretofore presented by leave of the court, it is considered, ordered, […]

260 U.S. 110 260 U.S. 110 43 S.Ct. 43 67 L.Ed. 157 BRATTON et al.v.CHANDLER et al. No. 239. Argued Oct. 10, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. M. M. Neil, Thomas H. Jackson, and James L. McRee, all of Memphis, Tenn. (Frank M. Thompson, Atty. Gen., and Nathan William MacChesney, of Chicago, Ill., of […]

259 U.S. 419 259 U.S. 419 42 S.Ct. 552 66 L.Ed. 999 STATE OF WYOMINGv.STATE OF COLORADO et al.* No. 3, Original. Re-Argued Jan. 9, 10, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922. [Syllabus from pages 419-421 intentionally omitted] Messrs. N. E. Corthell, of Laramie, Wyo., John W. Lacey, of Cheyenne, Wyo., Douglas A. Preston, of Rock […]

259 U.S. 80 259 U.S. 80 42 S.Ct. 423 66 L.Ed. 836 GROGAN, Collector of Internal Revenue, et al.v.HIRAM WALKER & SONS, Limited. ANCHOR LINE (HENDERSON BROS.), Limited, v. ALDRIDGE, Collector of Customs. Nos. 615 and 639. Argued April 19, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Goff, for appellants Grogan et al. […]

259 U.S. 97 259 U.S. 97 42 S.Ct. 418 66 L.Ed. 842 SOUTH COVINGTON & C. ST. RY. CO. et al.v.CITY OF NEWPORT, KY. No. 203. Argued April 13, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. Messrs. Alfred C. Cassatt, Richard P. Ernst, and Frank W. Cottle, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants. Mr. Brent Spence, of […]

259 U.S. 44 259 U.S. 44 42 S.Ct. 453 66 L.Ed. 822 HILL et al.v.WALLACE, Secretary of Agriculture et al. No. 616. Argued Jan. 11, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. This is a suit attacking the validity of the Future Trading Act, approved August 24, 1921. 42 Stat. 187, c. 86. The act imposes a […]

259 U.S. 503 259 U.S. 503 42 S.Ct. 529 66 L.Ed. 1033 WARD & GOWv.KRINSKY et al. No. 343. Argued December 14, 1921. Decided June 5, 1922. Mr. Herman S. Hertwig, of New York City, for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 503-506 intentionally omitted] Mr. E. Clarence Aiken, Deputy Atty. Gen., of […]

259 U.S. 548 259 U.S. 548 42 S.Ct. 524 66 L.Ed. 1056 CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.v.PERRY. No. 19. Reargued and Submitted October 6, 1921. Decided June 5, 1922. Messrs. C. O. Blake and W. R. Bleakmore, both of El Reno, Okl., John W. Willmott and R. J. Roberts, both of Wewoka, Okl., […]

259 U.S. 557 259 U.S. 557 42 S.Ct. 549 66 L.Ed. 1061 LIPKEv.LEDERER, Collector of lnternal Revenue. No. 596. Argued March 21, 22, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922. Mr. Lincoln L. Eyre, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. Mrs. Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, for appellee. Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Relying […]

259 U.S. 565 259 U.S. 565 42 S.Ct. 594 66 L.Ed. 1067 STATE OF OKLAHOMAv.STATE OF TEXAS (UNITED STATES et al., interveners). No. 20, Original. Partial Decree Entered June 5, 1922. Decree adjudicating proprietary claims to land in the bed of Red river, in accordance with the opinion reported in 258 U. S. 574, 42 […]

259 U.S. 572 259 U.S. 572 42 S.Ct. 597 66 L.Ed. 1069 STATE OF GEORGIAv.STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 16, Original. Supreme Court of the United States June 5, 1922 Form of Decree Submitted May 15, 1922. 1 Decree declaring location of interstate boundary. 2 This cause came on to be heard by this court, […]

259 U.S. 75 259 U.S. 75 42 S.Ct. 420 66 L.Ed. 833 AMERICAN SMELTING & REFINING CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 221. Argued April 25, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. Messrs. Wm. B. King and Geo. A. King, both of Washington, D. C., and Charles Earl, of New York City, for appellant. Wm. C. Herron, of Washington, […]

259 U.S. 344 259 U.S. 344 42 S.Ct. 570 66 L.Ed. 975 UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al.v.CORONADO COAL CO. et al. No. 31. Reargued March 22, 23, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922. [Syllabus from pages 344-346 intentionally omitted] This is a writ of error brought under section 241 of the Judicial Code (Comp. […]

259 U.S. 498 259 U.S. 498 42 S.Ct. 568 66 L.Ed. 1027 WEILAND, State Engineer of Colorado, et al.v.PIONEER IRR. CO. No. 3. Re-argued January 10, 11, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922. Messrs. Delph E. Carpenter, of Greeley, Colo., and Victor E. Keyes, Fred Farrar, and Leslie E. Hubbard, all of Denver, Colo., for appellants. […]

259 U.S. 530 259 U.S. 530 42 S.Ct. 516 66 L.Ed. 1044 PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICAv.CHEEK. No. 149. Argued and Submitted March 6, 1922. Decided June 5, 1922. Messrs. John H. Holliday and Thomas W. White, both of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederick H. Bacon, of St. Louis, Mo., for […]