Category: 1922

260 U.S. 290 260 U.S. 290 43 S.Ct. 100 67 L.Ed. 261 UNITED STATESv.OREGON LUMBER CO. et al. No. 40. Argued Oct. 9, 1922. Decided Nov. 27, 1922. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Riter, for the United States. [Argument of Counsel from pages 290-292 intentionally omitted] Mr. W. Lair Thompson, of Portland, Or., for defendants in […]

260 U.S. 3 260 U.S. 3 43 S.Ct. 5 67 L.Ed. 99 LEDERER, Collector of Internal Revenue for First District of Pennsylvania,v.STOCKTON. No. 16. Argued Oct. 5, 1922. Decided Oct. 16, 1922. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Ottinger, for petitioner. [Argument of Counsel from pages 4-6 intentionally omitted] Mr. Maurice Bower Saul, of Philadelphia, Pa., for […]

260 U.S. 309 260 U.S. 309 43 S.Ct. 129 67 L.Ed. 274 CITY OF BOSTONv.JACKSON, Treasurer. No. 141. Submitted on Motion to Dismiss or Affirm Nov. 13, 1922. Decided Dec. 4, 1922. [Syllabus on page 309-310 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Nathan Matthews and J. P. Lyons, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. J. […]

260 U.S. 178 260 U.S. 178 43 S.Ct. 65 67 L.Ed. 199 TAKAO OZAWAv.UNITED STATES. No. 1. Argued Oct. 3 and 4, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. Geo. W. Wickersham, of New York City, and David L. Withington, of Honolulu, T. H., for Takao Ozawa. [Argument of Counsel from pages 178-186 intentionally omitted] Mr. […]

260 U.S. 18 260 U.S. 18 43 S.Ct. 7 67 L.Ed. 105 UNITED STATESv.WONG SING. No. 44. Argued Oct. 11, 1922. Decided Oct. 23, 1922. Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Error to review the action of the District […]

260 U.S. 199 260 U.S. 199 43 S.Ct. 69 67 L.Ed. 209 TAKUJI YAMASHITA et al.v.HINKLE, Secretary of State of Washington. No. 177. Argued October 3 and 4, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. Geo. W. Wickersham, of New York City, and Corwin S. Shank, of Seattle, Wash., for petitioners. Mr. Lindsay L. Thompson, of […]

260 U.S. 201 260 U.S. 201 43 S.Ct. 18 67 L.Ed. 210 GASTON, WILLIAMS & WIGMORE OF CANADA, Limited,v.WARNER. No. 59. Argued Oct. 13, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. Cletus Keating, of New York City, for petitioner. Mr. Joseph P. Nolan, of New York City, for respondent. Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of […]

260 U.S. 205 260 U.S. 205 43 S.Ct. 26 67 L.Ed. 213 SOUTHERN PAC. CO. et al.v.OLYMPIAN DREDGING CO. No. 78. Argued Oct. 19, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. Wm. R. Harr, of Washington, D. C., and E. J. Foulds and Elmer Westlake, both of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. Mr. Thomas E. Haven, […]

260 U.S. 212 260 U.S. 212 43 S.Ct. 75 67 L.Ed. 217 COMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.v.LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al. No. 650. Argued Nov. 13, 1922. Decided Nov. 20, 1922. Mr. J. Blanc Monroe, of New Orleans, La., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from pages 213-214 intentionally omitted] Mr. Huey P. Long, of […]

260 U.S. 22 260 U.S. 22 43 S.Ct. 9 67 L.Ed. 107 JACKMANv.ROSENBAUM CO. No. 3. Argued Oct. 4, 1922. Decided Oct. 23, 1922. Mr. H. F. Stambaugh, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 23-29 intentionally omitted] Mr. A. Leo Weil, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant in error. Mr. […]

260 U.S. 220 260 U.S. 220 43 S.Ct. 78 67 L.Ed. 224 UNITED STATESv.ATKINS et al. ATKINS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. Nos. 45, 46. Argued Oct. 11, 12, 1922. Decided Nov. 20, 1922. Mr. H. L. Underwood, of Washington, D. C., for the United states. [Argument of Counsel from pages 221-223 intentionally […]

260 U.S. 235 260 U.S. 235 43 S.Ct. 118 67 L.Ed. 232 LIBERTY OIL CO.v.CONDON NAT. BANK et al. No. 98. Argued Nov. 15 and 16, 1922. Decided Nov. 27, 1922. [Syllabus from pages 235-236 intentionally omitted] This suit was begun as an action at law in the District Court of Kansas by the Liberty […]

260 U.S. 174 260 U.S. 174 43 S.Ct. 24 67 L.Ed. 194 ZUCHTv.KING et al. No. 84. Argued Oct. 20, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. Don A. Bliss, of San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. R. L. Ball and A. W. Seeligson, both of San Antonio, Tex., for defendants in error. Mr. […]

260 U.S. 103 260 U.S. 103 43 S.Ct. 44 67 L.Ed. 153 ORTEGA CO.v.TRIAY. No. 75. Argued Oct. 18, 19, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. Herman Ulmer and W. T. Stockton, both of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant. Messrs. Peter O. Knight, of Tampa, Fla., and J. L. Doggett, of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee. Mr. […]

260 U.S. 115 260 U.S. 115 43 S.Ct. 19 67 L.Ed. 162 DUESENBERG MOTORS CORPORATIONv.UNITED STATES. No. 80. Argued Oct. 19, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. Geo. A. King, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from pages 116-119 intentionally omitted] Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for the United […]

260 U.S. 125 260 U.S. 125 43 S.Ct. 37 67 L.Ed. 165 KEOKUK & HAMILTON BRIDGE CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 58. Argued and Submitted Oct. 13, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. Felix T. Hughes, of Keokuk, Iowa, for appellant. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United states. Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered […]

260 U.S. 127 260 U.S. 127 43 S.Ct. 16 67 L.Ed. 167 McKEE et al.v.GRATZ. No. 61. Argued Oct. 13-16, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. Lon O. Hocker, Frank H. Sullivan, and George F. Haid, all of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioners. [Argument of Counsel from pages 128-131 intentionally omitted] Mr. S. Mayner Wallace, […]

260 U.S. 137 260 U.S. 137 43 S.Ct. 36 67 L.Ed. 171 BROWNEv.THORN et al. No. 88. Argued Oct. 20, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. James B. McDonough, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Ira D. Oglesby, of Ft. Smith, Ark., and L. C. Going, of Memphis, Tenn., for defendants in […]

260 U.S. 141 260 U.S. 141 43 S.Ct. 38 67 L.Ed. 173 NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.v.FRUCHTER (two cases). Nos. 35, 36. Argued Oct. 6-9, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Mr. James W. Carpenter, of New Haven, Conn., for petitioner. Messrs. Harold R. Medina and Leon Sanders, both of New York City, […]

260 U.S. 146 260 U.S. 146 43 S.Ct. 22 67 L.Ed. 176 STATE OF OHIO ex rel. SENEY, Pros. Atty. of Lucas County, Ohio,v.SWIFT & CO. et al. No. 67. Argued Oct. 16, 1922. Decided Nov. 13, 1922. Messrs. Allen J. Seney and Charles S. Northup, both of Toledo, Ohio, for appellant. Mr. Harold W. […]