Category: 1921

257 U.S. 156 257 U.S. 156 42 S.Ct. 63 66 L.Ed. 180 UNITED STATESv.PHELLIS. No. 260. Argued Oct. 11, 1921. Decided Nov. 21, 1921. Mr. James M. Beck, Solicitor General, of Washington, D. C., for the United States. [Argument of Counsel from pages 157-161 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., and […]

257 U.S. 176 257 U.S. 176 42 S.Ct. 68 66 L.Ed. 186 ROCKEFELLERv.UNITED STATES. NEW YORK TRUST CO. et al. v. EDWARDS, Collector of Internal Revenue. Nos. 535, 536. Argued Oct. 11, 12, 1921. Decided Nov. 21, 1921. Mr. George Welwood Murray, of New York City (Mr. Harrison Tweed, of New York City, on the […]

257 U.S. 184 257 U.S. 184 42 S.Ct. 72 66 L.Ed. 189 AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIESv.TRICITY CENTRAL TRADES COUNCIL et al. No. 2. Reargued Oct. 4-5, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. [Syllabus from pages 184-186 intentionally omitted] Mr. Max Pam, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. [Argument of Counsel from pages 186-189 intentionally omitted] Mr. Frank C. […]

257 U.S. 213 257 U.S. 213 42 S.Ct. 84 66 L.Ed. 201 ROBERT MITCHELL FURNITURE CO.v.SELDEN BRECK CONST. CO. No. 56. Argued Nov. 7, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. Messrs. Leo J. Brumleve, Jr., and Walter A. De Camp. both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Simeon Nash and Curtis C. Williams, both […]

257 U.S. 216 257 U.S. 216 42 S.Ct. 87 66 L.Ed. 203 NORTH PAC. S. S. CO.v.SOLEY. No. 63. Submitted Nov. 7, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. Messrs. Ernest Clewe and Frank W. Aitken, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appeallant. [Argument of Counsel from page 217-218 intentionally omitted] Mr. Christopher M. Bradley, of San […]

257 U.S. 223 257 U.S. 223 42 S.Ct. 83 66 L.Ed. 206 HURLEYv.COMMISSION OF FISHERIES OF VIRGINIA et al. No. 33. Argued Oct. 10, 11, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. Messrs. Thomas B. Snead and S. S. P. Patteson, both of Richmond, Va., for appellant. [Syllabus from pages 223-225 intentionally omitted] Mr. Robert W. Schultice, […]

257 U.S. 226 257 U.S. 226 42 S.Ct. 71 66 L.Ed. 208 RAFFERTY, Collector of Internal Revenue,v.SMITH, BELL & CO., Limited. SAME v. COMPANIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS. SAME v. VISAYAN REFINING CO. Nos. 138, 140, and 142. Argued Nov. 10, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. Messrs. Grant T. Trent, of Washington, D. C., […]

257 U.S. 233 257 U.S. 233 42 S.Ct. 89 66 L.Ed. 210 WESTERN FUEL CO.v.GARCIA. No. 28. Argued Oct. 7-10, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. Messrs. Joseph F. Murray, of New York City, Norman Fischer, of Washington, D. C., Ira S. Lillick, of San Francisco, Cal., and Robert M. McCormick, of New York City, for […]

257 U.S. 244 257 U.S. 244 42 S.Ct. 85 66 L.Ed. 215 KAHN et al.v.UNITED STATES. No. 52. Argued Nov. 15, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. Mr. H. T. Newcomb, of New York City, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Ottinger, for the United States. Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 […]

257 U.S. 247 257 U.S. 247 42 S.Ct. 80 66 L.Ed. 217 CENTRAL R. CO. OF NEW JERSEY et al.v.UNITED STATES et al. No. 436 Argued Nov. 17, 1921. Decided Dec. 5, 1921. Messrs. Henry Wolf Bikle, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Alexander H. Elder, of New York City, for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from pages […]

257 U.S. 260 257 U.S. 260 42 S.Ct. 100 66 L.Ed. 222 CURTISv.CONNLY et al. No. 69. Argued Nov. 16-17, 1921. Decided Dec. 12, 1921. Mr. Edward F. McClennen, of Boston, Mass., for appellant. Messrs. Wm. W. Moss. Arthur M. Allen, and Eugene A. Kingman, all of Providence, R. I., for appellees. Mr. Justice HOLMES […]

257 U.S. 265 257 U.S. 265 42 S.Ct. 101 66 L.Ed. 227 EUREKA PIPE LINE CO.v.HALLANAN, State Tax Com’r, et al. No. 255. Argued Nov. 9, 1921. Deceded Dec. 12, 1921. Messrs. Frank L. Crawford, of New York City, and M. Beck, for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 266-268 intentionally omitted] Messrs. […]

257 U.S. 27 257 U.S. 27 42 S.Ct. 20 66 L.Ed. 112 HILDRETHv.MASTORAS No. 51 Argued Oct. 21, 1921. Decided Nov. 7, 1921. Messrs. George P. Dike, of Boston, Mass., and Frederic D. McKenney, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Mr. Joseph L. Atkins, of Portland, Or., for respondent. Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the […]

257 U.S. 129 257 U.S. 129 42 S.Ct. 42 66 L.Ed. 166 CRESCENT COTTON OIL CO.v.STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 41. Argued Oct. 17, 1921. Decided Nov. 14, 1921. Messrs. J. B. Harris, of Jackson, Miss., and Thomas A. Evans, of Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 130-132 intentionally omitted] Frank […]

257 U.S. 138 257 U.S. 138 42 S.Ct. 58 66 L.Ed. 171 JOHN HORSTMANN CO.v.UNITED STATES. NATRON SODA CO. v. SAME. Nos. 26, 32. Argued and Submitted Oct, 7, 1921. Decided Nov. 21, 1921. In No. 26: Messrs. Edward M. Clearly, of Washington, D. C., and Thomas A. Allen, for appellant. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, […]

257 U.S. 10 257 U.S. 10 42 S.Ct. 27 66 L.Ed. 104 YAZOO & M. V. R. CO. et al.v.CITY OF CLARKSDALE. No. 15. Argued Oct. 6, 1921. Decided Nov. 7, 1921. Messrs. H. D. Minor and Charles N. Burch, both of Memphis, Tenn., and Blewett Lee, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error. […]

257 U.S. 111 257 U.S. 111 42 S.Ct. 6 66 L.Ed. 154 ALABAMA & V. RY. CO.v.JOURNEY. No. 55. Argued and Submitted Oct. 21, 1921. Decided Nov. 7, 1921. Messrs. J. Blanc Monroe, of New Orleans, La., Monte M. Lemann, of New Orleans, La., and Robert H. Thompson, of Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff in error. […]

257 U.S. 114 257 U.S. 114 42 S.Ct. 25 66 L.Ed. 156 LOUISIANA & P. B. RY. CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 291. Argued Oct. 14, 1921. Decided Nov. 7, 1921. Mr. Luther M. Walter, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Mr. Blackburn Esterline, of Chicago, Ill., for the United States. The Attorney General and Messrs. W. R. […]

257 U.S. 118 257 U.S. 118 42 S.Ct. 13 66 L.Ed. 159 BREIHOLZ et al.v.BOARD OF SUP’RS OF POCAHONTAS COUNTY, IOWA, et al. No. 23. Argued Oct. 7, 1921. Decided Nov. 7, 1921. Mr. Denis M. Kelleher, of Ft. Dodge, Iowa, for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F. C. Gilchrist, of Laurens, Iowa, and Robert Healy, […]

257 U.S. 125 257 U.S. 125 42 S.Ct. 5 66 L.Ed. 163 HUNTv.UNITED STATES. No. 38. Argued Oct. 17, 1921. Decided Nov. 7, 1921. Messrs. Albert Chester Travis, of New York City, and Burt E. Barlow and Abram R. Serven, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Lovett, for the United […]