255 U.S. 228 255 U.S. 228 41 S.Ct. 314 65 L.Ed. 598 PAYNE, Secretary of Interior, et al.v.CENTRAL PAC. RY. CO. No. 17. Argued Oct. 6, 1920. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Nebeker and Messrs. Charles D. Mahaffie and C. Edward Wright, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel […]
Category: 1921
U.S. Supreme Court opinions from 1921.
255 U.S. 239
255 U.S. 239 255 U.S. 239 41 S.Ct. 293 65 L.Ed. 604 STOEHRv.WALLACE et al. No. 546. Argued Jan. 4 and 5, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Mr. Louis Marshall, of New York City, for appellant. Messrs. Solicitor General Frierson, of Chattanooga, Tenn., and George L. Ingraham and John Quinn, both of New York City, […]
255 U.S. 252
255 U.S. 252 255 U.S. 252 41 S.Ct. 269 65 L.Ed. 614 ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. et al.v.J. F. HASTY & SONS et al. No. 178. Submitted Jan. 21, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. George A. McConnell and John M. Moore, both of Little Rock, Ark., for appellants. Messrs. W. […]
255 U.S. 257
255 U.S. 257 255 U.S. 257 41 S.Ct. 256 65 L.Ed. 617 UNITED STATESv.FIELD. No. 422. Argued Dec. 9, 1920. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Davis and Mr. Solicitor General Frierson, for the United States. [Argument of Counsel from page 258-259 intentionally omitted] Mr. John P. Wilson, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee. […]
255 U.S. 266
255 U.S. 266 255 U.S. 266 41 S.Ct. 259 65 L.Ed. 621 NEW ORLEANS LAND CO.v.LEADER REALTY CO., Limited. No. 152. Argued Jan. 18, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Charles Louque and W. O. Hart, both of New Orleans, La., for appellant. Messrs. William Winans Wall and Gustave Lemle, both of New Orleans, La., […]
255 U.S. 268
255 U.S. 268 255 U.S. 268 41 S.Ct. 328 65 L.Ed. 623 EDWARD RUTLEDGE TIMBER CO. et al.v.FARRELL. No. 172. Argued Jan. 21, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Stiles W. Burr and C. W. Bunn, both of St. Paul, Minn., for appellants. Mr. S. M. Stockslager, of Washington, D. C., for appellee. Mr. Justice […]
255 U.S. 271
255 U.S. 271 255 U.S. 271 41 S.Ct. 255 65 L.Ed. 625 MAGUIRE et al.v.REARDON et al. No. 202. Argued Jan. 28, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Mr. J. F. Riley, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., and George Lull, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants in […]
255 U.S. 273
255 U.S. 273 255 U.S. 273 41 S.Ct. 288 65 L.Ed. 631 In re CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO. No. 24. Argued Dec. 13, 1920. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Lawrence Maxwell and William L. Day, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Messrs. George D. Welles, of Toledo, Ohio, and Thurlow M. Gordon, […]
255 U.S. 170
255 U.S. 170 255 U.S. 170 41 S.Ct. 282 65 L.Ed. 569 UNITED STATESv.HIGHSMITH. No. 148. Supreme Court of the United States Argued Jan. 18, 1921. February 28, 1921 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Garnett, for the United States. Mr. George S. Downer, of Albuquerque, N. M., for defendant in error. Mr. Justice DAY delivered the […]
255 U.S. 171
255 U.S. 171 255 U.S. 171 41 S.Ct. 285 65 L.Ed. 570 DETROIT UNITED RY.v.CITY OF DETROIT et al. No. 492. Argued Jan. 5 and 6, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, of New York, City, and Elliott G. Stevenson, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from page 172 intentionally […]
255 U.S. 216
255 U.S. 216 255 U.S. 216 41 S.Ct. 308 65 L.Ed. 592 THE PESARO. No. 317. Argued Jan. 26 and 27, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Oscar R. Houston, of New York City, Harold V. Amberg, of Washington, D. C., and Henry J. Bigham, of New York City, for appellants. Mr. John M. Woolsey, […]
255 U.S. 219
255 U.S. 219 255 U.S. 219 41 S.Ct. 309 65 L.Ed. 594 THE CARLO POMA. No. 167. Argued Jan. 26 and 27, 1920. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Oscar R. Houston, of New York City, Harold V. Amberg, of Washington, D. C., and D. Roger Englar, of New York City, for petitioner. Messrs. Van Vechten […]
255 U.S. 113
255 U.S. 113 255 U.S. 113 41 S.Ct. 324 65 L.Ed. 539 VANDALIA R. CO.v.SCHNULL et al. No. 125. Argued Dec. 16 and 17, 1920. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. D. P. Williams, of Pittsburgh, Pa., Samuel O. Pickens, of Indianapolis, Ind., and F. D. McKenney, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. […]
255 U.S. 124
255 U.S. 124 255 U.S. 124 41 S.Ct. 279 65 L.Ed. 545 POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE CO.v.CITY OF FREMONT. No. 156. Submitted Jan. 18, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Mr. John N. Sebrell, Jr., of Norfolk, Va., for plaintiff in error. Mr. R. E. Evans, of Dakota City, Neb., for defendant in error. Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered […]
255 U.S. 138
255 U.S. 138 255 U.S. 138 41 S.Ct. 260 65 L.Ed. 553 UNITED STATESv.RUSSELL. No. 143. Argued Jan. 17, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart, for the United States. Messrs. Otto Christensen and Seymour Stedman, both of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error. [Argument of Counsel from page 138-140 intentionally omitted] […]
255 U.S. 144
255 U.S. 144 255 U.S. 144 41 S.Ct. 252 65 L.Ed. 555 LOWER VEIN COAL CO.v.INDUSTRIAL BOARD OF INDIANA et al. No. 186. Argued Jan. 27, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. William H. Thompson, of Indianapolis, Ind., and Henry W. Moore, of Terre Haute, Ind., for appellant. Messrs. E. M. White, of Indianapolis, Ind., […]
255 U.S. 151
255 U.S. 151 255 U.S. 151 41 S.Ct. 310 65 L.Ed. 561 SILVER KING COALITION MINES CO.v.CONKLING MINING CO. (two cases). Nos. 158, 187. Argued Jan. 19, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Thomas Marioneaux, of Salt Lake City, Utah, Curtis H. Lindley, of San Francisco, Cal., W. H. Dickson and A. C. Ellis, Jr., […]
255 U.S. 163
255 U.S. 163 255 U.S. 163 41 S.Ct. 281 65 L.Ed. 566 UNITED STATESv.ROGERS et al. No. 147. Argued Jan. 17 and 18, 1921. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Garnett, for the United States. [Argument of Counsel from pages 164-166 intentionally omitted] Mr. George S. Downer, of Albuquerque, N. M., for defendants […]
255 U.S. 1
255 U.S. 1 255 U.S. 1 41 S.Ct. 224 65 L.Ed. 469 KAHN et al.v.ANDERSON, Warden of United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kan. No. 421. Argued Dec. 7 and 8, 1920. Decided Jan. 31, 1921. Messrs. Martin J. O’Donnell and Isaac B. Kimbrell, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellants. [Argument of Counsel from pages […]
255 U.S. 100
255 U.S. 100 255 U.S. 100 41 S.Ct. 303 65 L.Ed. 528 KENNINGTON et al.v.PALMER, Atty. Gen., et al. No. 367. Argued Oct. 18, 19, and 20, 1920. Decided Feb. 28, 1921. Messrs. Garner Wynn Green and Marcellus Green, both of Jackson, Miss., for appellants. The Attorney General, for respondents. Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered […]