102 U.S. 222 102 U.S. 222 102 U.S. 222 26 L.Ed. 149 GOODYEAR DENTAL VULCANITE COMPANYv.DAVIS. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Masschusetts. This was a bill in equity brought by the Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company against Charles G. Davis, alleging his infringement of reissued […]
Category: 1880
102 U.S. 230
102 U.S. 230 102 U.S. 230 102 U.S. 230 26 L.Ed. 133 GARNEAUv.DOZIER. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Joseph Garneau brought his bill of complaint against James Dozier and others. It is founded upon two letters-patent, the first being a reissue granted […]
102 U.S. 235
102 U.S. 235 102 U.S. 235 102 U.S. 235 26 L.Ed. 160 HERYFORDv.DAVIS. October Term, 1880 1 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. 2 This is an action under the statutes of Missouri, by Henry H. Davis, sheriff of Chariton County, for the use of the […]
102 U.S. 263
102 U.S. 263 102 U.S. 263 102 U.S. 263 26 L.Ed. 164 ROGERSv.PALMER. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. The facts as stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Edward G. Rogers for the appellant. Mr. Enoch Totten and Mr. Cushman K. Davis, […]
102 U.S. 269
102 U.S. 269 102 U.S. 269 102 U.S. 269 26 L.Ed. 165 FINCHv.United States October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Court of Claims. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Nathaniel Wilson and Mr. Lewis Abraham for the appellants. The Solicitor-General for the United States. Mr. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion […]
102 U.S. 203
102 U.S. 203 102 U.S. 203 102 U.S. 203 26 L.Ed. 132 LOUISIANAv.NEW ORLEANS. October Term, 1880 ERRORto the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Morris Ranger recovered, May 1, 1874, against the city of New Orleans certain judgments. To enforce the collection of them, he instituted, June 21, 1879, this proceeding, in the […]
102 U.S. 208
102 U.S. 208 102 U.S. 208 102 U.S. 208 26 L.Ed. 147 SOLOMONv.ARTHUR. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This was an action brought by Solomon Solomon and others, constituting the firm of Solomon Brothers, against Arthur, the collector of the port […]
102 U.S. 214
102 U.S. 214 102 U.S. 214 102 U.S. 214 26 L.Ed. 157 THE ‘BENEFACTOR.’ October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. This is a libel filed in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York by William […]
102 U.S. 219
102 U.S. 219 102 U.S. 219 102 U.S. 219 26 L.Ed. 159 HENTIGv.PAGE. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. C. A. Sperry for the appellant. Mr. G. C. Clemens, contra. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE […]
102 U.S. 180
102 U.S. 180 102 U.S. 180 102 U.S. 180 26 L.Ed. 51 RAILWAY COMPANYv.RENWICK. October Term, 1880 MOTION to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa, coupled with a motion under Rule 6 to affirm the judgment. This was a proceeding, under the statute of Iowa, by the […]
102 U.S. 183
102 U.S. 183 102 U.S. 183 102 U.S. 183 26 L.Ed. 43 EX PARTE PERRY. October Term, 1880 PETITION for mandamus. The petitioners filed their libel against the ship ‘Civilta’ and the steam-tug ‘Restless,’ in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The vessels were seized under process […]
102 U.S. 187
102 U.S. 187 102 U.S. 187 102 U.S. 187 26 L.Ed. 99 COUNTY OF GREENEv.DANIEL.COUNTY OF PICKENSv.DANIEL. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama. The first of these actions was brought by Richard C. Daniel against the county of Greene in the State of […]
102 U.S. 197
102 U.S. 197 102 U.S. 197 102 U.S. 197 26 L.Ed. 130 RECKNAGELv.MURPHY. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This was a suit brought against Murphy, then collector of customs at the port of New York, by Recknagel & Co., to recover […]
102 U.S. 200
102 U.S. 200 102 U.S. 200 102 U.S. 200 26 L.Ed. 145 THE ‘CLARA.’ October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Henry J. Scudder for the appellants. Mr. Robert D. Benedict and […]
102 U.S. 14
102 U.S. 14 102 U.S. 14 102 U.S. 14 26 L.Ed. 61 RAILROAD COMPANYv.NATIONAL BANK. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This was an action by The National Bank of the Republic of New York against The Brooklyn City and Newtown Railroad […]
102 U.S. 148
102 U.S. 148 102 U.S. 148 102 U.S. 148 26 L.Ed. 106 GRAHAMv.RAILROAD COMPANY. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. This is a bill in equity filed by Lawrence G. Graham and Donald D. Scott against the La Crosse and Milwaukee Railroad Company, […]
102 U.S. 163
102 U.S. 163 102 U.S. 163 102 U.S. 163 26 L.Ed. 111 POTTERv.NATIONAL BANK. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. George Willard for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Huntington W. Jackson and […]
102 U.S. 167
102 U.S. 167 102 U.S. 167 102 U.S. 167 26 L.Ed. 126 MINING COMPANYv.CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY. October Term, 1880 The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Peter Van Clief and Mr. Oliver D. Barrett for the plaintiff in error; Mr. Samuel M. Wilson and Mr. George A. Nourse for the defendant […]
102 U.S. 177
102 U.S. 177 102 U.S. 177 102 U.S. 177 26 L.Ed. 129 JIFKINSv.SWEETZER. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. F. Carroll Brewster for the appellants. Mr. A. Ricketts, contra. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE […]
102 U.S. 132
102 U.S. 132 102 U.S. 132 102 U.S. 132 26 L.Ed. 44 FRENCHv.WADE. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. This was a suit brought March 14, 1878, against Joseph M. French, by the heirs-at-law of Henry F. Wade, Jr., to recover the possession of […]