Category: 1880

103 U.S. 90 103 U.S. 90 103 U.S. 90 26 L.Ed. 310 BOOGHERv.INSURANCE COMPANY. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. This was an action by the New York Life Insurance Company against Davis R. Boogher and his sureties, upon a bond executed by […]

103 U.S. 99 103 U.S. 99 103 U.S. 99 26 L.Ed. 443 NATIONAL BANKv.WHITNEY. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Theodore Bacon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. W. Harris Day, contra. MR JUSTICE FIELD delivered […]

103 U.S. 806 103 U.S. 806 103 U.S. 806 26 L.Ed. 612 THOMPSONv.PERRINE. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York: This action was commenced on the first day of May, 1876, by Perrine, against the town of Thompson, a municipal corporation in Sullivan […]

103 U.S. 828 103 U.S. 828 103 U.S. 828 26 L.Ed. 618 BROWNv.SLEE. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Iowa. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The case was argued by Mr. George G. Wright and Mr. Chester C. Cole, with […]

103 U.S. 839 103 U.S. 839 103 U.S. 839 26 L.Ed. 557 RICHMOND MINING COMPANYv.EUREKA MINING COMPANY. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nevada. This is a suit in ejectment brought by the Eureka Consolidated Mining Company against the Richmond Mining Company of Nevada to […]

103 U.S. 87 103 U.S. 87 103 U.S. 87 26 L.Ed. 477 JONESv.VAN BENTHUYSEN. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Smith for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John D. Rouse and […]

103 U.S. 80 103 U.S. 80 103 U.S. 80 26 L.Ed. 318 ALLENv.LOUISIANA. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. S. T. Glover and Mr. John R. Shepley for the plaintiff in error. […]

103 U.S. 800 103 U.S. 800 103 U.S. 800 26 L.Ed. 532 JOHNSTONv.LAFLIN. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. John B. Henderson and Mr. George H. Shields for the appellant. Mr. A. […]

103 U.S. 821 103 U.S. 821 103 U.S. 821 26 L.Ed. 471 RAILROAD COMPANYv.FALCONER.RAILROAD COMPANYv.WEEKS. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Richard T. Merrick, for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Richard P. Marvin and Mr. Clarkson […]

103 U.S. 786 103 U.S. 786 103 U.S. 786 26 L.Ed. 610 MANUFACTURING COMPANYv.CORBIN. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Edmund Wetmore for the appellant. Mr. Charles E. Mitchell and Mr. O. H. […]

103 U.S. 792 103 U.S. 792 103 U.S. 792 26 L.Ed. 460 COOKv.LILLO. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Charles B. Singleton, Mr. Richard H. Browne, and Mr. John A. Campbell for the […]

103 U.S. 794 103 U.S. 794 103 U.S. 794 26 L.Ed. 461 EX PARTE RAILWAY COMPANY. October Term, 1880 ORIGINAL. Mr. Fillmore Beall presented the petition of the Des Moines and Minneapolis Railroad Company, duly verified by affidavit, and moved for a rule on the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of […]

103 U.S. 797 103 U.S. 797 103 U.S. 797 26 L.Ed. 426 CROUCHv.ROEMER. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. This is a suit in equity by George Crouch against William Roemer to prevent the infringement by the latter of reissued letters-patent No. 4289, […]

103 U.S. 783 103 U.S. 783 103 U.S. 783 26 L.Ed. 459 NATIONAL BANKv.INSURANCE COMPANY. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United Staes for the Southern District of New York. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. George Bliss for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph Larocque, […]

103 U.S. 756 103 U.S. 756 103 U.S. 756 26 L.Ed. 554 RAILWAY COMPANYv.SPRAGUE. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Joseph E. McDonald and Mr. James Emott for the appellant. Mr. Clarkson N. […]

103 U.S. 764 103 U.S. 764 103 U.S. 764 26 L.Ed. 458 HINCKLEYv.MORTON. October Term, 1880 MOTION to dismiss an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois, with which is united a motion to affirm. Mr. R. Biddle Roberts in support of the motions. Mr. Leonard Swett […]

103 U.S. 766 103 U.S. 766 103 U.S. 766 26 L.Ed. 607 CLARKv.KILLIAN. October Term, 1880 APPEAL from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Francis Miller for the appellant. Mr. William J. Miller, contra. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the […]

103 U.S. 770 103 U.S. 770 103 U.S. 770 26 L.Ed. 488 COUNTY OF WILSONv.NATIONAL BANK. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Joseph S. Fowler for the plaintiff in error. Mr. R. […]

103 U.S. 780 103 U.S. 780 103 U.S. 780 20 L.Ed. 608 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYv.BANGS. October Term, 1880 1 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. 2 The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. 3 Mr. Herbert L. Baker and Mr. William A. Maury for […]

103 U.S. 739 103 U.S. 739 103 U.S. 739 26 L.Ed. 456 GRINNELLv.RAILROAD COMPANY. October Term, 1880 ERROR to the SupremeCo urt of the State of Iowa. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. Saul S. Henkle and Mr. Johe S. Hauke for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas S. Withrow […]