75 U.S. 325

75 U.S. 325 75 U.S. 325 19 L.Ed. 455 8 Wall. 325 THE LADY FRANKLIN. December Term, 1868 APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois, in which court King & Co. had libelled the propeller Lady Franklin, for non-delivery of certain flour. The libel alleged, that the libellants, in the month […]

Read More

75 U.S. 314

75 U.S. 314 75 U.S. 314 19 L.Ed. 317 8 Wall. 314 GIBSONv.CHOUTEAU. December Term, 1868 ON motion to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Missouri. The case purported to be brought here, under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, which gives this court jurisdiction to review judgments in the […]

Read More

75 U.S. 325

75 U.S. 325 75 U.S. 325 19 L.Ed. 455 8 Wall. 325 THE LADY FRANKLIN. December Term, 1868 APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois, in which court King & Co. had libelled the propeller Lady Franklin, for non-delivery of certain flour. The libel alleged, that the libellants, in the month […]

Read More

75 U.S. 302

75 U.S. 302 75 U.S. 302 19 L.Ed. 392 8 Wall. 302 THE CARROLL. December Term, 1868 THIS was a case of collision between the schooner Loon and the steamer Carroll, which occurred on the waters of Chesapeake Bay. The collision happened about two o’clock at night; the night was bright, and the weight of […]

Read More

75 U.S. 307

75 U.S. 307 75 U.S. 307 19 L.Ed. 394 8 Wall. 307 THE LUCY. December Term, 1868 MOTION to dismiss an appeal from the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, condemning the schooner Lucy, the case being this: An act of Congress of 18031 prescribes the circumstances under which appeals are allowed from […]

Read More

75 U.S. 242

75 U.S. 242 75 U.S. 242 19 L.Ed. 409 8 Wall. 242 DRAKELYv.GREGG. December Term, 1868 1 243] 2 IN error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. 3 The controversy grew out of the last of three shipments of pork products, in January, 1865, to Drakely & Fenton, […]

Read More

75 U.S. 242

75 U.S. 242 75 U.S. 242 19 L.Ed. 409 8 Wall. 242 DRAKELYv.GREGG. December Term, 1868 1 243] 2 IN error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. 3 The controversy grew out of the last of three shipments of pork products, in January, 1865, to Drakely & Fenton, […]

Read More

75 U.S. 269

75 U.S. 269 75 U.S. 269 19 L.Ed. 453 8 Wall. 269 GIBBONSv.UNITED STATES. December Term, 1868 APPEAL from the Court of Claims. The case as found by that court was thus: Gibbons entered into a contract with the United States for the delivery of two hundred thousand bushels of oats within thirty days from […]

Read More

75 U.S. 269

75 U.S. 269 75 U.S. 269 19 L.Ed. 453 8 Wall. 269 GIBBONSv.UNITED STATES. December Term, 1868 APPEAL from the Court of Claims. The case as found by that court was thus: Gibbons entered into a contract with the United States for the delivery of two hundred thousand bushels of oats within thirty days from […]

Read More

75 U.S. 27

75 U.S. 27 75 U.S. 27 19 L.Ed. 346 8 Wall. 27 MILLSv.SMITH. December Term, 1868 ERROR to the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois: the case was this: In 1818, the United States issued to one Parmely, a soldier of the war of 1812, and then residing in Connecticut, a patent for […]

Read More

75 U.S. 27

75 U.S. 27 75 U.S. 27 19 L.Ed. 346 8 Wall. 27 MILLSv.SMITH. December Term, 1868 ERROR to the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois: the case was this: In 1818, the United States issued to one Parmely, a soldier of the war of 1812, and then residing in Connecticut, a patent for […]

Read More

75 U.S. 276

75 U.S. 276 75 U.S. 276 19 L.Ed. 349 8 Wall. 276 HUDSON CANAL CO.v.PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO. December Term, 1868 ERROR to the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York. The case was this: The Pennsylvania Coal Company, being engaged in mining coals from land in the northeast corner of Pennsylvania, for which […]

Read More

75 U.S. 276

75 U.S. 276 75 U.S. 276 19 L.Ed. 349 8 Wall. 276 HUDSON CANAL CO.v.PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO. December Term, 1868 ERROR to the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York. The case was this: The Pennsylvania Coal Company, being engaged in mining coals from land in the northeast corner of Pennsylvania, for which […]

Read More

75 U.S. 292

75 U.S. 292 75 U.S. 292 19 L.Ed. 415 8 Wall. 292 PATTERSONv.DE LA RONDE. December Term, 1868 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for Louisiana. The case was thus: In April, 1853, Pierre Hoa sold to one Mrs. McGee a plantation and several slaves attached thereto, in Louisiana, for the sum […]

Read More

75 U.S. 292

75 U.S. 292 75 U.S. 292 19 L.Ed. 415 8 Wall. 292 PATTERSONv.DE LA RONDE. December Term, 1868 ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for Louisiana. The case was thus: In April, 1853, Pierre Hoa sold to one Mrs. McGee a plantation and several slaves attached thereto, in Louisiana, for the sum […]

Read More

75 U.S. 202

75 U.S. 202 75 U.S. 202 19 L.Ed. 306 8 Wall. 202 SEYMOURv.FREER. December Term, 1868 APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois. On the 9th of May, 1835, Henry Seymour, residing at Utica, New York, and Jeremiah Price, residing at Chicago, Illinois, entered in New York, into a contract, thus: […]

Read More

75 U.S. 202

75 U.S. 202 75 U.S. 202 19 L.Ed. 306 8 Wall. 202 SEYMOURv.FREER. December Term, 1868 APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois. On the 9th of May, 1835, Henry Seymour, residing at Utica, New York, and Jeremiah Price, residing at Chicago, Illinois, entered in New York, into a contract, thus: […]

Read More

75 U.S. 230

75 U.S. 230 75 U.S. 230 19 L.Ed. 339 8 Wall. 230 MOREYv.LOCKWOOD. December Term, 1868 1 APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts. 2 Lockwood, assignee of the inventors, filed a bill in the court just named to restrain Morey and others from infringing letters patent granted to Charles H. and […]

Read More

75 U.S. 230

75 U.S. 230 75 U.S. 230 19 L.Ed. 339 8 Wall. 230 MOREYv.LOCKWOOD. December Term, 1868 1 APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts. 2 Lockwood, assignee of the inventors, filed a bill in the court just named to restrain Morey and others from infringing letters patent granted to Charles H. and […]

Read More

75 U.S. 153

75 U.S. 153 75 U.S. 153 19 L.Ed. 406 8 Wall. 153 PROPELLER MOHAWK. December Term, 1868 APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the case being thus: On the 31st of October, 1860, two parties, owners of it, shipped on board the propeller Mohawk, the vessel being then at Chicago, […]

Read More