Category: 1859

63 U.S. 341 63 U.S. 341 22 How. 341 16 L.Ed. 260 ALEXANDER REY, WILLIAM R. MARSHALL, AND JOSEPH M.MARSHALL PARTNERS UNDER THE NAME, STYLE, AND FIRM,OF MARSHALL & CO., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.JAMES W. SIMPSON. December Term, 1859 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Supreme Court of the Territory […]

63 U.S. 352 63 U.S. 352 22 How. 352 16 L.Ed. 345 JOHN P. JETER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JAMES HEWITT, MELVILLE HERON, AND MARY CONRAD. December Term, 1859 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. 2 It was an […]

63 U.S. 299 63 U.S. 299 22 How. 299 16 L.Ed. 382 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.JOHN J. WALKER.THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.ARTHUR F. HOPKINS.THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.RICHARD LEE FEARN. December Term, 1859 THESE three cases were brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States […]

63 U.S. 315 63 U.S. 315 22 How. 315 16 L.Ed. 317 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.THE WIDOW AND HEIRS OF MARCUS WEST, DECEASED. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of California. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. It […]

63 U.S. 318 63 U.S. 318 22 How. 318 16 L.Ed. 370 LOUIS L. REFELD, A. B. K. THETFORD, AND TERRENCEFARRELLY, EXECUTORS, MARY F. NOTREBE, WIDOW, ANDEDWARD C. MORTON AND HIS WIFE, MARY F. MORTON, HEIRSOF FREDERICK NOTREBE, DECEASED, APPELLANTS,v.WILLIAM W. WOODFOLK. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the […]

63 U.S. 330 63 U.S. 330 22 How. 330 16 L.Ed. 249 EBER B. WARD, SURVIVOR, &c., OWNER OF THE STEAMBOATDETROIT, APPELLANT,v.CHARLES THOMPSON. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States, sitting in admiralty, for the district of Michigan. It was a libel filed by Eber B. Ward […]

63 U.S. 28 63 U.S. 28 22 How. 28 16 L.Ed. 360 CHARLES EMERSON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.HORATIO N. SLATER. December Term, 1859 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts. 2 It was the same case which was before this […]

63 U.S. 282 63 U.S. 282 22 How. 282 16 L.Ed. 259 CHARLES McMICKEN’S EXECUTORS, VIZ: WILLIAM CROSSMAN,FREEMAN G. CAREY, AND WILLIAM M. F. IIEWSON,v.FRANKLIN PERIN. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. The case was twice before this court, and […]

63 U.S. 286 63 U.S. 286 22 How. 286 16 L.Ed. 340 THE UNITED STATESv.THE WIDOW, HEIRS, AND EXECUTORS, OF WILLIAM E. P.HARTNELL, DECEASED. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. […]

63 U.S. 290 63 U.S. 290 22 How. 290 16 L.Ed. 342 THE EXECUTORS AND HEIRS OF AUGUSTIN DE YTURBIDE,DECEASED, APPELLANTS,v.THE UNITED STATES. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of California. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of […]

63 U.S. 293 63 U.S. 293 22 How. 293 16 L.Ed. 343 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.THE HEIRS OF FRANCISCO DE HARO, DECEASED. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of California. The facts of the case and state of the title are fully […]

63 U.S. 246 63 U.S. 246 22 How. 246 16 L.Ed. 280 SIDNEY E. COLLINS, APPELLANT,v.DRURY THOMPSON, WILLIAM F. CLEVELAND, AND JAMESCAMPBELL’S WIDOW, HEIRS, AND DEVISEES. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the southern district of Alabama. It was a bill filed by Collins, to […]

63 U.S. 256 63 U.S. 256 22 How. 256 16 L.Ed. 313 JOSEPH KIMBRO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.CUTHBERT BULLITT, THOMAS D. MILLER, AND LLOYD D.ADDISON, PARTNERS IN TRADE UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OFBULLITT, MILLER, & Co. December Term, 1859 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United […]

63 U.S. 270 63 U.S. 270 22 How. 270 16 L.Ed. 337 HENRY O. CLARK, IRA JUSTIN, JUN., AND A. HYATT SMITH,PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.HENRY C. BOWEN, THEODORF McNAMEE, SAMUEL P. HOLMES,AND HENRY L. STONE, DEFENDANTS. December Term, 1859 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the District Court of the United States […]

63 U.S. 274 63 U.S. 274 22 How. 274 16 L.Ed. 338 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.RAFAEL GARCIA. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of California. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. It was argued by Mr. Stanton and […]

63 U.S. 227 63 U.S. 227 22 How. 227 16 L.Ed. 243 JOHN C. SINNOT, SAMUEL WOLF, AND JAMES SANDS.PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.GORHAM DAVENPORT AND OTHERS, COMMISSIONERS OF PILOTAGEOF THE BAY AND HARBOR OF MOBILE. December Term, 1859 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama by a writ of […]

63 U.S. 23 63 U.S. 23 22 How. 23 16 L.Ed. 239 WILLIAM B. LAWLER, APPELLANT,v.HORACE B. CLAFLIN, WILLIAM H. MELLEN, NATHANIEL F.MILLER, DAVID H. CONKLING, AND HENRY STONE. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Minnesota. The action was commeneed in the District Court, second district, […]

63 U.S. 244 63 U.S. 244 22 How. 244 16 L.Ed. 248 PHINEAS O. FOSTER, ROGER A. HEIRNE, AND GEORGE J.BLAKESLEE, OWNERS OF THE STEAMBOAT SWAN,PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.GORHAM DAVENPORT AND OTHERS, COMMISSIONERS OF PILOTAGEOF THE BAY AND HARBOR OF MOBILE. December Term, 1859 THIS was a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Alabama. […]

63 U.S. 192 63 U.S. 192 22 How. 192 16 L.Ed. 336 SAMUEL VERDEN, APPELLANT,v.ISAAC COLEMAN. December Term, 1859 THIS was an appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana, purporting to be brought up under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act. It was a case of foreclosure of a mortgage brought […]

63 U.S. 193 63 U.S. 193 22 How. 193 16 L.Ed. 306 ROBINSON LYTLE AND LYDIA L. HIS WIFE, NATHAN H. CLOYES,AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, CHARLES B. BERTRAND, AND OTHERS. December Term, 1859 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas by a writ of […]