59 U.S. 16 59 U.S. 16 18 How. 16 15 L.Ed. 277 WILLIAM J. MCLEAN AND JOHN M. BASS, EXECUTORS OF HENRYR. W. HILL, DECEASED, THE SAID HENRY R. W. HILL ANDWILLIAM J. MCLEAN BEING THE SURVIVING PARTNERS OF THEFIRM OF N. AND J. DICK AND CO., APPELLANTS,v.JAMES L. MEEK, ADMINISTRATOR OF JOSEPH MEEK, AND […]
Category: 1855
59 U.S. 165
59 U.S. 165 59 U.S. 165 18 How. 165 15 L.Ed. 328 EDWIN C. LITTLE, AND OLIVER SCOVILL, APPELLANTS,v.LEVI W. HALL, ANTHONY GOULD, DAVID BANKS, WILLIAM GOULD,AND DAVID BANKS, JR. December Term, 1855 THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States, for the northern district of New York. The case is […]
59 U.S. 173
59 U.S. 173 59 U.S. 173 18 How. 173 15 L.Ed. 338 JAMES M. COOPER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.ENOCH C. ROBERTS. December Term, 1855 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Michigan. It is stated in the opinion of the court. It […]
59 U.S. 143
59 U.S. 143 59 U.S. 143 18 How. 143 15 L.Ed. 304 EDWARD C. RICHARDS, ISAAC BASSETT, AND ROBERT W.ABORN, COMPLAINANTS AND APPELLANTS,v.SYLVANUS HOLMES, A. H. HARPER, GEORGE A. DWIGHT ET AL. December Term, 1855 THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and […]
59 U.S. 150
59 U.S. 150 59 U.S. 150 18 How. 150 15 L.Ed. 320 WILLIAM JONES AND SYLVESTER MARSH, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.WILLIAM S. JOHNSTON. December Term, 1855 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the circuit court of the United States, for the District of Illinois. The case is stated in the opinion of […]
59 U.S. 136
59 U.S. 136 59 U.S. 136 18 How. 136 15 L.Ed. 290 ALFRED SAVIGNAC, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.ABRAHAM GARRISON. December Term, 1855 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Missouri. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. It was […]
59 U.S. 137
59 U.S. 137 59 U.S. 137 18 How. 137 15 L.Ed. 318 ROBERT A. PARKER AND MILES WHITE, APPELLANTS,v.WILLIAM OVERMAN. December Term, 1855 THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States, for the District of Arkansas. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. It was argued by Mr. […]
59 U.S. 110
59 U.S. 110 59 U.S. 110 18 How. 110 15 L.Ed. 311 JECKER, TORRE, AND CO., ET AL., CLAIMANTS OF THE CARGOOF THE SHIP ADMITTANCE, AND FESSENDEN AND FAY,CLAIMANTS OF THE SHIP ADMITTANCE,v.JOHN B. MONTGOMERY, LIBELLANT. December Term, 1855 THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the District of […]
59 U.S. 126
59 U.S. 126 59 U.S. 126 18 How. 126 15 L.Ed. 334 ADAM HAM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE STATE OF MISSOURI. December Term, 1855 THIS case was brought up from the supreme court of the State of Missouri, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the judiciary act. It is fully stated […]
59 U.S. 135
59 U.S. 135 59 U.S. 135 18 How. 135 15 L.Ed. 290 ALBERT H. GUILD AND JOHN F. LIGHTNER, PARTNERS INTRADE, UNDER THE FIRM OF GUILD AND LIGHTNER, AND HENRYHUGG AND ROBERT G. HANNA, PARTNERS IN TRADE, UNDER THESTYLE AND FIRM OF HENRY HUGG AND CO.,PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.JOSEPH FRONTIN. December Term, 1855 THIS case was […]
59 U.S. 1
59 U.S. 1 59 U.S. 1 18 How. 1 15 L.Ed. 291 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.PEARSON B. READING. December Term, 1855 THIS was an appeal from the district court of the United States for the northern district of California. The claim was originally presented to the board of commissioners, who confirmed it in December, 1852, […]
59 U.S. 100
59 U.S. 100 59 U.S. 100 18 How. 100 15 L.Ed. 299 THE UNITED STATES, USE OF JAMES MACKEY ET AL.PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.RICHARD S. COXE. December Term, 1855 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the circuit court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and for the […]
59 U.S. 106
59 U.S. 106 59 U.S. 106 18 How. 106 15 L.Ed. 298 RICHARD H. SESSIONS, DANIEL H. SESSIONS, AND SANDFORD C.FAULKNER, APPELLANTS,v.JOHN M. PINTARD. December Term, 1855 THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Arkansas. It was a sequel to the case of Goodloe’s Administrator […]
59 U.S. 109
59 U.S. 109 59 U.S. 109 18 How. 109 15 L.Ed. 280 LOUIS CURTIS, BENJAMIN CURTIS, JOHN L. HUBBARD, JAMES D.B. CURTIS, AND HENRY A. BOORAINE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.MADAME THERESE PETITPAIN, WIFE OF VICTOR FESTE, ANDMANDERVILLE MARIGNY, LATE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERNDISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. December Term, 1855 THIS case was brought up by […]