Category: 1853

56 U.S. 348 56 U.S. 348 15 How. 348 14 L.Ed. 724 CLINTON WALWORTH, PLAINTIFF IN EFFOR,v.JAMES KNEELAND AND HANNAH HIS WIFE, AND FRANCESCORNELIA FOSTER AND WILLIAM FOSTER, INFANTS, BY THEIRNEXT FRIEND, JAMES KNEELAND. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin, by a writ of […]

56 U.S. 354 56 U.S. 354 15 How. 354 14 L.Ed. 727 FARISH CARTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.ARCHIBALD T. BENNETT. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Florida, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the judiciary act. The case is set forth […]

56 U.S. 281 56 U.S. 281 15 How. 281 14 L.Ed. 696 HOLLINGSWORTH MAGNIAC, DANIEL SMITH MAGNIAC, AND WILLIAMJARDINE, LATE TRADING UNDER THE FIRM OF MAGNIAC &COMPANY, APPELLANTS,v.JOHN R. THOMSON. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting as a court […]

56 U.S. 304 56 U.S. 304 15 How. 304 14 L.Ed. 705 JAMES N. CURRAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, THE BANK OF THE STATE OFARKANSAS, JOHN M. ROSS, FINANCIAL RECEIVER, ANDDAVID W. CARROL, BANK ATTORNEY. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Arkansas, by a writ of […]

56 U.S. 31 56 U.S. 31 15 How. 31 14 L.Ed. 587 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.CHRISTIAN ROSELIUS, ABIAL D. CROSSMAN, WILLIAM E.LIVERIDGE, FRANCOIS B. D’AUTUIN, BENJAMIN C. HOWARD,JOHN SPEAR SMITH, BRANTZ MAYER, JOHN GIBSON, AND R. R.GURLEY, EXECUTORS OF JOHN McDONOGH, DECEASED. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the […]

56 U.S. 323 56 U.S. 323 15 How. 323 14 L.Ed. 714 REUBEN ANDERSON AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.MICHAEL BOCK. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The facts in the case are set forth in […]

56 U.S. 330 56 U.S. 330 15 How. 330 14 L.Ed. 717 Ross WINANS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.ADAM, EDWARD, AND TALBOT DENMEAD. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. 2 It was an action brought by Ross […]

56 U.S. 252 56 U.S. 252 15 How. 252 14 L.Ed. 683 ERASTUS CORNING AND JOHN F. WINSLOW, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.PETER A. BURDEN. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Peter A. Burden, as assignee […]

56 U.S. 272 56 U.S. 272 15 How. 272 14 L.Ed. 692 JOHN GARROW, THOMAS Y. HOW, JR., JAMES SEYMOUR, ANDGEORGE MILLER, APPELLANTS,v.AMOS DAVIS, GEORGE M. PICKERING, WILLIAM McCRILLIS,AND EPHRAIM PAULK. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maine, sitting as a court […]

56 U.S. 198 56 U.S. 198 15 How. 198 14 L.Ed. 660 CORNELIUS KANOUSE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JOHN M. MARTIN. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up from the Superior Court of the city of New York, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act. 2 A motion […]

56 U.S. 212 56 U.S. 212 15 How. 212 14 L.Ed. 665 ARTEMAS L. BROOKS, IGNATIUS TYLER, WILLIAM W.WOODWORTH, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF WILLIAM WOODWORTH,DECEASED, AND ALSO AS GRANTEE, AND JAMES G.WILSON, APPELLANTS,v.JOHN FISKE AND NICHOLAS G. NORCROSS, DOING BUSINESSUNDER THE FIRM OF FISKE & NORCROSS. December Term, 1853 (Mr. Justice Curtis did not sit in […]

56 U.S. 233 56 U.S. 233 15 How. 233 14 L.Ed. 674 THE NORTHERN INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, AND THE BOARD OFCOMMISSIONERS FOR THE WESTERN DIVISION OF THEBUFFALO AND MISSISSIPPI RAILROAD, APPELLANTS,v.THE MICHIGAN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States, for the District of Michigan, […]

56 U.S. 162 56 U.S. 162 15 How. 162 14 L.Ed. 644 CHARLES BISPHAM, APPELLANT,v.ELI K. PRICE, EXECUTOR OF JOSEPH ARCHER, DECEASED. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting as a court of equity. The facts in the case are […]

56 U.S. 179 56 U.S. 179 15 How. 179 14 L.Ed. 652 WILLIAM C. BEVINS AND OLIVER P. EARLE, SURVIVINGPARTNERS OF THE FIRM OF BEVINS, EARLE & CO., ASSIGNEES,&C., WHO SUE FOR THE USE OF OLIVER P. EARLE,PLAINTIFFS IN ERRORv.WILLIAM B. A. RAMSEY, ROBERT CRAIGHEAD, JAMES P. N.CRAIGHEAD, THOMAS W. HUMES, AND JAMES McMILLAN,ADMINISTRATOR OF […]

56 U.S. 189 56 U.S. 189 15 How. 189 14 L.Ed. 656 THOMAS C. ROCKHILL, WADE T. SMITH, AND WILLIAM P.ROCKHILL, PLAINTIFFS,v.ROBERT HANNA, ASA B. STRONG, EDWARD HEIZER, AARONALDRIDGE, ROBERT B. HANNA, DAVID SHIELDS, THOMASJOHNSON, JEREMIAH JOHNSON, AND GEORGE BRUCE. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up from the Circuit Court of the United […]

56 U.S. 160 56 U.S. 160 15 How. 160 14 L.Ed. 643 ELIJAH PHELPS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JACOB MAYER. December Term, 1853 Mr. Justice Curtis did not sit in this cause, having been of counsel for the patentee. 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States […]

56 U.S. 137 56 U.S. 137 15 How. 137 14 L.Ed. 634 FRANCIS O. J. SMITH, PLAINTIFF,v.HEMAN B. ELY, HENRY O’REILLY, ROBERT W. McCOY, THOMASMOODIE, MICHAEL B. BATEHAM, LINCOLN GOODALE, WRAYTHOMAS, ALBERT B. BUTTLES AND ROBERT NEIL. December Term, 1853 THIS cause came up from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District […]

56 U.S. 14 56 U.S. 14 15 How. 14 14 L.Ed. 580 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.JEAN BAPTISTE D’AUTERIEVE, PONPONNE LE BLANC ANDOTHERS, HEIRS AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF JEAN ANTOINE BERNARDD’AUTERIEVE, DECEASED. December Term, 1853 1 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Louisiana. 2 The […]

56 U.S. 143 56 U.S. 143 15 How. 143 14 L.Ed. 636 JAMES E. BROOME, ADMINISTRATOR DE BONIS NON OF ARTEMACON, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE UNITED STATES. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida. The facts […]

56 U.S. 1 56 U.S. 1 15 How. 1 14 L.Ed. 575 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.SAMUEL DAVENPORT’S HEIRS. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, under the Acts of 1824 and 1844 so often referred to in cases previously reported. The […]