Category: 1853

57 U.S. 469 57 U.S. 469 16 How. 469 14 L.Ed. 1019 THE STEAMBOAT NEW WORLD, EDWARD MINTURN, WILLIAM MENZIE,AND WILLIAM H. WEBB, CLAIMANTS AND APPELLANTS,v.FREDERICK G. KING. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. It was a libel filed by […]

57 U.S. 48 57 U.S. 48 16 How. 48 14 L.Ed. 839 SAUNDERS BURGESS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JOHN M. GRAY, THOMAS BURGESS, JR., AARON BURGESS,SIMEON BURGESS, JAMES BURGESS, JR., SAMUEL T.NORTHCUT, alias NORTHCRAFT, SILAS HUSKY, AARON A. SMIRL,GEORGE ARNOLD, AUSTIN M. JOHNSTON, GEORGE W. OGDEN,JOHN C. HARRINGTON, JOHN WATSON, LEWIS BUSH, ANDJAMES G. CROMME. December Term, […]

57 U.S. 369 57 U.S. 369 16 How. 369 14 L.Ed. 977 THE PIQUA BRANCH OF THE STATE BANK OF OHIO,PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JACOB KNOOP, TREASURER OF MIAMI COUNTY. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Ohio, by a writ of error, issued under the twenty-fifth section of the […]

57 U.S. 38 57 U.S. 38 16 How. 38 14 L.Ed. 835 FREDERIC D. CONRAD, PLAINTIFF IN ERRORv.DAVID GRIFFEY. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. It was before this court at December term, 1850, and […]

57 U.S. 314 57 U.S. 314 16 How. 314 14 L.Ed. 953 ALEXANDER J. MARSHALL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. 2 Marshall, a citizen of Virginia, […]

57 U.S. 354 57 U.S. 354 16 How. 354 14 L.Ed. 970 FITZ HENRY HOMER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.GEORGE L. BROWN. December Term, 1853 1 (MR. JUSTICE CURTIS, having been of counsel, did not sit in the argument of this case.) THIS case came up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United […]

57 U.S. 263 57 U.S. 263 16 How. 263 14 L.Ed. 931 EDWIN BARTLETT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.GEORGE P. KANE. December Term, 1853 THIS case came up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. It was an action brought by Bartlett against Kane, who was the […]

57 U.S. 275 57 U.S. 275 16 How. 275 14 L.Ed. 936 JANE M. CARROLL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.LESSEE OF GEORGE W. CARROLL, DE ROSZ CARROLL, ROBERT D.CARROLL, CHARLES W. CARROLL, JOHN M. MARTIN ANDAMERICA HIS WIFE, AND JOHN FORD AND MARY HIS WIFE. December Term, 1853 THIS case came up, by writ of error, from […]

57 U.S. 288 57 U.S. 288 16 How. 288 14 L.Ed. 942 WILLIAM A. SMITH AND OTHERS,v.LEROY SWORMSTEDT AND OTHERS. December Term, 1853 1 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Ohio, which dismissed the bill. 2 The bill was originally filed in the names of […]

57 U.S. 30 57 U.S. 30 16 How. 30 14 L.Ed. 832 JOHN C. YERGER, APPELLANT,v.WILLIAM H. JONES, AND ROBERT S. BRANDON, EXECUTORSOF WILLIAM BRANDON, DECEASED. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting as a court of equity. It was […]

57 U.S. 203 57 U.S. 203 16 How. 203 14 L.Ed. 905 HENRY CHOUTEAU, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.PATRICK MOLONY. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for the District of Iowa. 2 It was an action brought by petition, in the nature […]

57 U.S. 242 57 U.S. 242 16 How. 242 14 L.Ed. 922 AUGUSTINE ANNE LOUISE DENISE, HYACINTH ADDA MAYNEAUD DEPAUCEMONT, COUNTESS DE TOURNON, SERAPHINE CARPENTIER,WIDOW OF OLIVIER LOUIS MARTIN, CHARLES ALEXANDERMARTIN, JANE MARARIE SERAPHINA MARTIN, AND JAQUESFRANCOIS, JUSTINIAN FRANCOIS, AND ANTIONE JOSEPHSERVAIS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.BENJAMIN RUGGLES. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up by […]

57 U.S. 251 57 U.S. 251 16 How. 251 14 L.Ed. 925 THIRION MAILLARD, EARNEST CAYLERS, AND HAMILLE C.ROUMAGE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.CORNELIUS W. LAWRENCE. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. 2 It was […]

57 U.S. 164 57 U.S. 164 16 How. 164 14 L.Ed. 889 ALEXANDER CROSS, WILLIAM L. HOBSON, AND WILLIAM HOOPER,TRADING UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF CROSS, HOBSON, & COMPANY,PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.EDWARD H. HARRISON. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case came up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States, for […]

57 U.S. 247 57 U.S. 247 16 How. 247 14 L.Ed. 923 CORNELIUS D. THORP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.ARDEL B. RAYMOND. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The circumstances of the case are fully stated […]

57 U.S. 142 57 U.S. 142 16 How. 142 14 L.Ed. 879 CHARLES DAVENPORT ET AL., HEIRS OF JOHNDAVENPORT, DECEASED,v.F. FLETCHER ET AL. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. It will be necessary to state […]

57 U.S. 144 57 U.S. 144 16 How. 144 14 L.Ed. 880 JAMES ADAMS, EXECUTOR OF THOMAS LAW, DECEASED, AND HENRYMAY, ADMINISTRATOR OF EDMUND AND THOMAS LAW, APPELLANTS,v.JOSEPH E. LAW, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, MARY ROBINSON. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of […]

57 U.S. 150 57 U.S. 150 16 How. 150 14 L.Ed. 883 JOHN STUART, JOSEPH STUART, JAMES STUART, AND WILLIAM H.SCOTT, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.HUGH MAXWELL. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. 2 The […]

57 U.S. 104 57 U.S. 104 16 How. 104 14 L.Ed. 863 PIERRE CLAUDE PIQUIGNOT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The facts in the case are stated in […]

57 U.S. 135 57 U.S. 135 16 How. 135 14 L.Ed. 876 IN THE MATTER OF JOSIAH S. STAFFORD AND JEANNETTEKIRKLAND, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,v.THE UNION BANK OF LOUISIANA. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the State of Texas. It will be seen, by a reference […]