Category: 1853

57 U.S. 86 57 U.S. 86 16 How. 86 14 L.Ed. 856 EDWARD H. McCABE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.LLOYD D. WORTHINGTON. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act. 2 It was […]

57 U.S. 98 57 U.S. 98 16 How. 98 14 L.Ed. 861 GEORGE W. AND HENRY SIZER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.WILLIAM V. MANY. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. Mr. George T. Curtis, on behalf of the […]

57 U.S. 82 57 U.S. 82 16 How. 82 14 L.Ed. 854 EDWARD P. FOURNIQUET AND WIFE, AND MARTIN W. EWINGAND WIFE, APPELLANTS,v.JOHN PERKINS. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The controversy between the parties had been at several different […]

57 U.S. 619 57 U.S. 619 16 How. 619 14 L.Ed. 1083 CRUZ CERVANTES, APPELLANT,v.THE UNITED STATES. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for Northern California. In February, 1852, Cervantes filed before the board of commissioners to ascertain and settle the private land claims in California, […]

57 U.S. 622 57 U.S. 622 16 How. 622 14 L.Ed. 1084 JOHN C. DESHLERv.GEORGE C. DODGE. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Ohio. 2 It was an action of replevin brought by Deshler, a resident […]

57 U.S. 635 57 U.S. 635 16 How. 635 14 L.Ed. 1090 JOHN DOE, ON THE DEMISE OF LOT CLARK, DAVID CLARKSON,JOSEPH D. BEERS, ANDREW TALCOTT, BRANTZ MAYER, ANDHARRIET HACKLEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JOSEPH ADDISON BRADEN. December Term, 1853 THIS case came up, by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for […]

57 U.S. 65 57 U.S. 65 16 How. 65 14 L.Ed. 847 JOSIAS PENNINGTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.LYMAN GIBSON. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by a writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. 2 The facts of the case are set forth in […]

57 U.S. 571 57 U.S. 571 16 How. 571 14 L.Ed. 1063 WILLIAM J. SLICER, LAWRENCE SLICER, WILLIAM CROMWELLSLICER, AND MARCELLA SLICER, MINORS, BY THEIR FATHER ANDNEXT FRIEND, WILLIAM J. SLICER, AND MARTHA VIRGINIABERKLEY, JERMEMIAH BERRY, AND THOMAS CROMWELLBERRY, APPELLANTS,v.THE BANK OF PITTSBURG. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of […]

57 U.S. 580 57 U.S. 580 16 How. 580 14 L.Ed. 1066 CHARLES B. CALVERT AND GEORGE H. CALVERT,PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.JOSEPH H. BRADLEY AND BENJAMIN F. MIDDLETON. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and […]

57 U.S. 599 57 U.S. 599 16 How. 599 14 L.Ed. 1074 SAMUEL H. EARLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERRORv.JOHN ROGERS, JUNIOR, AND JOSEPH ROGERS, SURVIVORS, &c.OF ROGERS & BROTHERS, DEFENDANTS. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of […]

57 U.S. 610 57 U.S. 610 16 How. 610 14 L.Ed. 1079 WILLIAM EARLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JOHN DOE, ON THE DEMISE OF RHODA E. HOMANS. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case came up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and for the […]

57 U.S. 524 57 U.S. 524 16 How. 524 14 L.Ed. 1043 TIMOTHY FANNING, APPELLANT,v.CHARLES GREGOIRE AND CHARLES BOGG. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Iowa. It originated in the State Court, called the District Court of the County of Dubuque, and […]

57 U.S. 535 57 U.S. 535 16 How. 535 14 L.Ed. 1047 MARY E. BARNEY, BY HER NEXT FRIEND MAXWELLWOODHULL, APPELLANT,v.DAVID SAUNDERS, ROGER C. WEIGTMAN, AND SAMUEL C. BARNEY. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and for the county […]

57 U.S. 547 57 U.S. 547 16 How. 547 14 L.Ed. 1052 DANIEL R. SOUTHARD, SAMUEL D. TOMPKINS, WILLIAM L.THOMPSON, MATILDA BURKS, JOSEPH R. TUNSTALL, JOHNBURKS, JAMES BURKS, SAMUEL BURKS, CHARLES BURKS, ANDMARY BURKS (the four last named by WILLIAM L. THOMPSON,their next friend,)v.GILBERT C. RUSSELL. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the […]

57 U.S. 513 57 U.S. 513 16 How. 513 14 L.Ed. 1038 JAMES IRWIN, APPELLANT,v.THE UNITED STATES. December Term, 1853 1 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting as a court of equity. The facts were these: 2 On 6th November, 1836, W. […]

57 U.S. 480 57 U.S. 480 16 How. 480 14 L.Ed. 1024 WILLIAM H. SEYMOUR AND DAYTON S. MORGAN,PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.CYRUS H. MCCORMICK. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. The manner in which the […]

57 U.S. 492 57 U.S. 492 16 How. 492 14 L.Ed. 1029 HENRIETTA AMIS, EXECUTRIX, AND WILLIAM PERKINS,EXECUTOR, OF JUNIUS AMIS, DECEASED, APPELLANTS,v.DAVID MYERS. December Term, 1853 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Junius Amis filed his bill under the following circumstances: The […]

57 U.S. 494 57 U.S. 494 16 How. 494 14 L.Ed. 1030 JOSEPH GUITARD, FREDERICK STEUDEMAN AND MARY HIS WIFE,AND GEORGE BROWN AND JULIA HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.HENRY STODDARD. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of […]

57 U.S. 416 57 U.S. 416 16 How. 416 14 L.Ed. 997 THE OHIO LIFE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY,PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.HENRY DEBOLT, TREASURER OF HAMILTON COUNTY,DEFENDANT IN ERROR. December Term, 1853 THIS case was brought up from the District Court of the State of Ohio, in and for the county of Hamilton, by a writ […]

57 U.S. 451 57 U.S. 451 16 How. 451 14 L.Ed. 1012 LOUIS D. GAMACHE, SAMUEL AND LEONORE GAMACHE, BYGUARDIAN, WILSON PRIMM, LOUIS PRIMM, JOHN CAVENDEN,AND ABBY P. TRUE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.FRANCOIS X. PIQUIGNOT, AND THE INHABITANTS OF THETOWN OF CARONDELET. December Term, 1853 1 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of […]