MORFORDv.UNITED STATES.

339 U.S. 258 339 U.S. 258 70 S.Ct. 586 94 L.Ed. 815 MORFORDv.UNITED STATES. No. 236. Distributed Oct. 9, 1949. Decided April 10, 1950. Messrs David Rein, Washington, D.C., Abraham J. Isserman, Los Angeles, Cal., Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Messrs. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., Washington, D.C., Alexander M. Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., […]

Read More

UNITED STATESv.WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING CO.

339 U.S. 261 339 U.S. 261 70 S.Ct. 644 94 L.Ed. 816 UNITED STATESv.WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING CO. No. 26. Argued Oct. 13—14, 1949. Decided April 17, 1950. Mr. Roger P. Marquis, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Milton J. Donovan, Springfield, Mass., for respondent. Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 On […]

Read More

DENNISv.UNITED STATES.

339 U.S. 162 339 U.S. 162 70 S.Ct. 519 94 L.Ed. 734 DENNISv.UNITED STATES. No. 14. Argued Nov. 7, 1949. Decided March 27, 1950. Rehearing Denied May 1, 1950. See 339 U.S. 950, 70 S.Ct. 799. Mr. George W. Crockett, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., Washington, D. C., […]

Read More

DARRv.BURFORD, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

339 U.S. 200 339 U.S. 200 70 S.Ct. 587 94 L.Ed. 761 DARRv.BURFORD, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary. No. 51. Submitted Dec. 5, 1949. Decided April 3, 1950. Mr. John B. Ogden, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner. Mr. Mac Q. Williamson and Mr. Sam H. Lattimore, Oklahoma City, Okl., for respondent. Mr. Justice REED delivered […]

Read More

SLOCUMv.DELAWARE, L. & W.R. CO.

339 U.S. 239 339 U.S. 239 70 S.Ct. 577 94 L.Ed. 795 SLOCUMv.DELAWARE, L. & W.R. CO. No. 391. Argued Feb. 8, 1950. Decided April 10, 1950. Messrs. Leo J. Hassenauer, Chicago, Ill., Manly Fleischmann, Buffalo, N.Y., for petitioner. Mr. Pierre W. Evans, Elmira, N.Y., for respondent. Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the […]

Read More

ORDER OF RY. CONDUCTORS OF AMERICAv.SOUTHERN RY. CO.

339 U.S. 255 339 U.S. 255 70 S.Ct. 585 94 L.Ed. 811 ORDER OF RY. CONDUCTORS OF AMERICAv.SOUTHERN RY. CO. No. 438. Argued Feb. 8—9, 1950. Decided April 10, 1950. Mr. V. C. Shuttleworth, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for petitioner. Mr. W. Scott Mcagill, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the […]

Read More

REIDERv.THOMPSON.

339 U.S. 113 339 U.S. 113 70 S.Ct. 499 94 L.Ed. 698 REIDERv.THOMPSON. No. 403. Argued Feb. 7, 1950. Decided March 13, 1950. Rehearing Denied April 10, 1950. See 339 U.S. 936, 70 S.Ct. 663. Mr. Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Mr. M. Truman Woodward, Jr., New Orleans, La., for respondent. Mr. […]

Read More

STANDARD-VACUUM OIL CO.v.UNITED STATES.

339 U.S. 157 339 U.S. 157 70 S.Ct. 545 94 L.Ed. 731 STANDARD-VACUUM OIL CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 18. Argued Oct. 13, 1949. Decided March 27, 1950. Mr. Albert R. Connelly, New York City, for petitioner. Mr. Newell A. Clapp, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 On December […]

Read More

HIATT, Warden,v.BROWN.

339 U.S. 103 339 U.S. 103 70 S.Ct. 495 94 L.Ed. 691 HIATT, Warden,v.BROWN. No. 359. Argued Feb. 6—7, 1950. Decided March 13, 1950. Rehearing Denied April 17, 1950. See 339 U.S. 939, 70 S.Ct. 672. Consistent interpretation of Article of War by the Army as vesting a discretion in appointing authority as to availability […]

Read More

RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES’ ASS’Nv.UNITED STATES et al.

339 U.S. 142 339 U.S. 142 70 S.Ct. 530 94 L.Ed. 721 RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES’ ASS’Nv.UNITED STATES et al. No. 337. Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 1950. Decided March 27, 1950. Rehearing Denied May 1, 1950. See 339 U.S. 950, 70 S.Ct. 800. Mr. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. Daniel W. […]

Read More

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAv.LITTLE.

339 U.S. 1 339 U.S. 1 70 S.Ct. 468 94 L.Ed. 599 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAv.LITTLE. No. 302. Argued Jan. 11—12, 1950. Decided Feb. 20, 1950. Mr. Chester H. Gray, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Jeff Busby, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Anne X. Alpern, Pittsburgh, Pa., for the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers as amicus […]

Read More

52 U.S. 663

52 U.S. 663 52 U.S. 663 11 How. 663 13 L.Ed. 857 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.SARAH TURNER, THE WIFE OF JARED D. TYLER, WHO ISAUTHORIZED AND ASSISTED HEREIN BY HER SAID HUSBAND;ELIZA TURNER, WIFE OF JOHN A. QUITMAN, WHO IS IN LIKEMANNER AUTHORIZED AND ASSISTED BY HER SAID HUSBAND;HENRY TURNER, AND GEORGE W. TURNER, HEIRS […]

Read More

52 U.S. 669

52 U.S. 669 52 U.S. 669 11 How. 669 13 L.Ed. 859 JOHN H. BENNETT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.SAMUEL F. BUTTERWORTH. December Term, 1850 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of The United States for the District of Texas. In 1848, Butterworth filed the following petition against Bennett:—— ‘To […]

Read More

52 U.S. 663

52 U.S. 663 52 U.S. 663 11 How. 663 13 L.Ed. 857 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.SARAH TURNER, THE WIFE OF JARED D. TYLER, WHO ISAUTHORIZED AND ASSISTED HEREIN BY HER SAID HUSBAND;ELIZA TURNER, WIFE OF JOHN A. QUITMAN, WHO IS IN LIKEMANNER AUTHORIZED AND ASSISTED BY HER SAID HUSBAND;HENRY TURNER, AND GEORGE W. TURNER, HEIRS […]

Read More

52 U.S. 669

52 U.S. 669 52 U.S. 669 11 How. 669 13 L.Ed. 859 JOHN H. BENNETT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.SAMUEL F. BUTTERWORTH. December Term, 1850 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of The United States for the District of Texas. In 1848, Butterworth filed the following petition against Bennett:—— ‘To […]

Read More

52 U.S. 63

52 U.S. 63 52 U.S. 63 11 How. 63 13 L.Ed. 605 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.ETIENNE ALPHONSO BOISDOR E, LAURENT BOISDOR E, SIDNEYBOISDOR E, MATHILDE AND ALERINE NICOLAS, WIDOW OFMANUEL FABRE DANONY, CAROLINE NICOLAS, ELISENICOLAS, JOSEPH MANUEL DE LABARRE, DELPHINE VICTOIRE DELABARRE REAL AND HER HUSBAND CHRISTOVAL REAL, LOUISDEJEAN, ANTOINE BOISDOR E, AND MANATTE DEJEAN […]

Read More

52 U.S. 609

52 U.S. 609 52 U.S. 609 11 How. 609 13 L.Ed. 834 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.THE MAYOR, ALDERMEN, AND INHABITANTS OF THE CITIES OFPHILADELPHIA AND NEW ORLEANS. December Term, 1850 1 THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. 2 It was a petition filed by […]

Read More

52 U.S. 63

52 U.S. 63 52 U.S. 63 11 How. 63 13 L.Ed. 605 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,v.ETIENNE ALPHONSO BOISDOR E, LAURENT BOISDOR E, SIDNEYBOISDOR E, MATHILDE AND ALERINE NICOLAS, WIDOW OFMANUEL FABRE DANONY, CAROLINE NICOLAS, ELISENICOLAS, JOSEPH MANUEL DE LABARRE, DELPHINE VICTOIRE DELABARRE REAL AND HER HUSBAND CHRISTOVAL REAL, LOUISDEJEAN, ANTOINE BOISDOR E, AND MANATTE DEJEAN […]

Read More