Category: 1849

48 U.S. 89 48 U.S. 89 7 How. 89 12 L.Ed. 618 CHARLES WILKES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.SAMUEL DINSMAN. January Term, 1849 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for Washington county in the District of Columbia. 2 It was an action of trespass vi […]

48 U.S. 833 48 U.S. 833 7 How. 833 12 L.Ed. 934 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.RICHARD KING AND DANIEL W. COXE, DEFENDANTS. January Term, 1849 THIS case was formerly before this court, and is reported in 3 Howard, 773. Being sent down to the Circuit Court under a mandate from this court, it […]

48 U.S. 812 48 U.S. 812 7 How. 812 12 L.Ed. 925 JONATHAN W. NESMITH AND THOMAS NESMITH, COMPLAINANTS,v.THOMAS C. SHELDON, HORACE H. COMSTOCK, DAVID FRENCH,WILLIAM E. PETERS, JAMES FORTON, ATTA E. MATHER, HENRYB. HOLBROOK, SAMUEL P. MEAD, FRANCIS E. ELDRED, PHEBEANN DEAN, CULLEN BROWN, AND CHARLES H. STEWART,RESPONDENTS. January Term, 1849 THIS case was […]

48 U.S. 819 48 U.S. 819 7 How. 819 12 L.Ed. 928 GEORGE B. STEARNS, ADMINISTRATOR DE BONIS NON OF JOHNO. PAGE, APPELLANT,v.RUFUS R. PAGE. January Term, 1849 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States, sitting as a court of equity, for the District of Maine. The bill, filed by […]

48 U.S. 785 48 U.S. 785 7 How. 785 12 L.Ed. 914 CORNELIUS W. LAWRENCE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.GILBERT ALLEN AND SAMUEL C. PAXTON. January Term, 1849 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. It was an action of […]

48 U.S. 798 48 U.S. 798 7 How. 798 12 L.Ed. 919 ELEAZER F. BACKUS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.WILLIAM GOULD AND DAVID BANKS, WHO SUE AS WELL FORTHE UNITED STATES AS THEMSELVES. January Term, 1849 1 THIS case was brought, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District […]

48 U.S. 772 48 U.S. 772 7 How. 772 12 L.Ed. 908 HALL NEILSON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.WILSON LAGOW. January Term, 1849 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Indiana, by a writ of error issued under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act. As a motion was made to dismiss it for […]

48 U.S. 776 48 U.S. 776 7 How. 776 12 L.Ed. 909 WILLIAM LIEWS, WHO SUES FOR THE USE OF NICHOLASLONGWORTH, PLAINTIFF,v.THOMAS LEWIS, ADMINISTRATOR DE BONIS NON OF MOSESBROADWELL, DECEASED. January Term, 1849 THIS case came up from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Illinois, on a certificate of division […]

48 U.S. 784 48 U.S. 784 7 How. 784 12 L.Ed. 913 JEREMIAH VAN RENSSELAER, APPELLANT,v.JOHN WATTS’S EXECUTORS. January Term, 1849 Mr. Blunt, of counsel for the appellant in this cause, moved he court to direct the clerk to docket the case as of the time when the transcript of the record was received by […]

48 U.S. 738 48 U.S. 738 7 How. 738 12 L.Ed. 894 HEZEKIAH SMITH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.WILLIAM HUNTER, TREASURER OF BUTLER COUNTY, JAMES B.CAMERON, AUDITOR OF BUTLER COUNTY, AND THE PRESIDENT ANDTRUSTEES OF THE MIAMI UNIVERSITY. January Term, 1849 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Ohio, by a writ of error […]

48 U.S. 745 48 U.S. 745 7 How. 745 12 L.Ed. 897 WILLIAM McDONALD, ADMINISTRATOR OF DUNCAN McARTHUR,DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.MATTHEW HOBSON. January Term, 1849 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Ohio. 2 There was no bill of exceptions […]

48 U.S. 760 48 U.S. 760 7 How. 760 12 L.Ed. 903 W. AND H. MASSINGILL, PLAINTIFFS,v.A. C. DOWNS, CLAIMANT. January Term, 1849 THIS case came up from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi, upon a certificate of division in opiinion between the judges thereof. The facts are […]

48 U.S. 769 48 U.S. 769 7 How. 769 12 L.Ed. 907 GRANT B. UDELL AND JACOB MILLER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.ALEXANDER B. DAVIDSON. January Term, 1849 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois, by a writ of error issued under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act. The […]

48 U.S. 660 48 U.S. 660 7 How. 660 12 L.Ed. 861 THE STATE OF MISSOURI, COMPLAINANT,v.THE STATE OF IOWA, RESPONDENT.THE STATE OF IOWA, COMPLAINANT,v.THE STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT.—Cross-Bill. January Term, 1849 THE State of Missouri filed a bill against the State of Iowa, in the Supreme Court of the United States, with the consent […]

48 U.S. 693 48 U.S. 693 7 How. 693 12 L.Ed. 875 BENJAMIN D. HARRIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JAMES D. WALL. January Term, 1849 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. 2 In February, 1839, the following sealed note […]

48 U.S. 706 48 U.S. 706 7 How. 706 12 L.Ed. 880 THOMAS TOWNSEND, PLAINTIFF IN ERRORS,v.ROBERT JEMISON. January Term, 1849 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi. It was a suit brought by Jemison against Townsend, to recover […]

48 U.S. 729 48 U.S. 729 7 How. 729 12 L.Ed. 890 PLINY CUTLER, APPELLANT,v.WILLIAM A. RAE. January Term, 1849 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. It was a libel filed in the District Court, as a court of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, by […]

48 U.S. 681 48 U.S. 681 7 How. 681 12 L.Ed. 870 THOMAS AP CATESBY JONES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE UNITED STATES. January Term, 1849 1 THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia. 2 It was a suit brought by […]

48 U.S. 627 48 U.S. 627 7 How. 627 12 L.Ed. 847 JOHN L. SHAWHAN, DANIEL SHAWHAN, GEORGE H. PERRIN,BENJAMIN BERRY, CATHARINE SNODGRASS, AND ISAACMILLER, APPELLANTS,v.PERRY WHERRITT, ASSIGNEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OFBENJAMIN BRANDON. January Term, 1849 1 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky. […]

48 U.S. 646 48 U.S. 646 7 How. 646 12 L.Ed. 855 WILLIAM AND FRANCIS SADLER, COMPLAINANTS,v.THOMAS B. HOOVER, SYLVANUS CHAMBERS, AND SAMUEL H.DINKINS, PARTNERS BY THE STYLE OF THOMAS B.HOOVER AND COMPANY. January Term, 1849 THIS case came up, on a certificate of division, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the […]