Category: 1847

46 U.S. 7 46 U.S. 7 5 How. 7 12 L.Ed. 26 N. AND J. DICK AND COMPANYv.HARDIN D. RUNNELS. January Term, 1847 This case came up from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Mississippi, on a certificate of division in opinion between the judges thereof. The only question involved […]

46 U.S. 72 46 U.S. 72 5 How. 72 12 L.Ed. 55 HENRY MILLER, ADMINISTRATOR OF GEORGE MILLER, DECEASED,PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.BETSEY HERBERT AND CAROLINE HERBERT, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. January Term, 1847 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, for the county of Washington. The […]

46 U.S. 83 46 U.S. 83 5 How. 83 12 L.Ed. 60 THE ALEXANDRIA CANAL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.FRANCIS SWANN, DEFENDANT. January Term, 1847 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, in and for the county of Washington. It originated […]

46 U.S. 91 46 U.S. 91 5 How. 91 12 L.Ed. 64 HENRY D. BRIDGES, JOHN K. MABRAY, JAMES N. HARPER, ANDSTERN SIMMONDS, LATE MERCHANTS AND PARTNERS IN TRADE,UNDER THE NAME, FIRM, AND STYLE OF BRIDGES, MABRAY, ANDCOMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.WILLIAM ARMOUR, HENRY LAKE, AND FELIX WALKER, LATEMERCHANTS AND PARTNERS IN TRADE, UNDER THE NAME, […]

46 U.S. 96 46 U.S. 96 5 How. 96 12 L.Ed. 66 HENRY A. HALL, PLAINTIFF,v.WILLIAM SMITH. January Term, 1847 1 THIS case came up on a certificate of division from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. 2 The United States of America, District of Maryland, to wit:—— 3 […]

46 U.S. 64 46 U.S. 64 5 How. 64 12 L.Ed. 52 ELIZABETH WALKER, DEVISEE OF ROBERT WALKER, DECEASED,PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.FRANCIS T. TAYLOR, WILLIAM ROBINSON, WILLIAM E. SABLETT,THOMAS COOK, AND JOHN M. CRESUP, TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OFCOLUMBUS, DEFENDANTS. January Term, 1847 THIS case was brought up, by a writ of error issued under the […]

46 U.S. 69 46 U.S. 69 5 How. 69 12 L.Ed. 54 SAMUEL HILDEBURN, PLAINTIFF,v.HENRY TURNER, DEFENDANT. January Term, 1847 THIS case came up on a certificate of division in opinion from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. The point of difference is fully set forth in the […]

46 U.S. 504 46 U.S. 504 5 How. 504 12 L.Ed. 256 SAMUEL THURLOW, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.JOEL FLETCHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLAINTATIONS.ANDREW PEIRCE, JR., AND THOMAS W. PEIRCE,PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. January Term, 1847 THESE cases were all brought up from the respective […]

46 U.S. 53 46 U.S. 53 5 How. 53 12 L.Ed. 46 MORGAN McAFEE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.THOMAS C. DOREMUS, JAMES SUYDAM, CORNELIUS R.SUYDAM, AND JOHN NIXON. January Term, 1847 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for the Northern, District of Mississippi. 2 On […]

46 U.S. 6 46 U.S. 6 5 How. 6 12 L.Ed. 25 STEPHEN SEWALL, APPELLANT,v.HENRY V. CHAMBERLAIN. January Term, 1847 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting as a court of equity. The facts in the case are sufficiently set forth in the […]

46 U.S. 441 46 U.S. 441 5 How. 441 12 L.Ed. 226 NATHANIEL S. WARING AND PETER DALMAN, OWNERS OF THESTEAMBOAT DE SOTO, HER TACKLE, APPAREL, ANDFURNITURE, APPELLANTS,v.THOMAS CLARKE, LATE MASTER OF THE STEAMBOAT LUDA, ANDAGENT OF P. T. MARIONOUX AND T. J. ABEL, OWNERS OF SAIDSTEAMBOAT LUDA, HER TACKLE, APPAREL, FURNITURE, ANDMACHINERY, APPELLEES. January […]

46 U.S. 51 46 U.S. 51 5 How. 51 12 L.Ed. 46 JAMES PEPPER, SARAH H. EVANS, GEORGE McCULLOUGH, ANDLOUISA McCULLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.HUGH W. DUNLAP, CURATOR, C., AND HIS WIFE January Term, 1847 THIS case was brought by writ of error, under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, from the Supreme Court of […]

46 U.S. 410 46 U.S. 410 5 How. 410 12 L.Ed. 213 MALINDA FOXv.THE STATE OF OHIO. January Term, 1847 1 THIS case was brought up by a writ of error, issued under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act, from the Supreme Court of Ohio. 2 It was an indictment, in the State court, […]

46 U.S. 343 46 U.S. 343 5 How. 343 12 L.Ed. 181 JOHN SCOTT AND CARL BOLAND, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.JOHN JONES, LESSEE OF THE DETROIT YOUNG MEN’S SOCIETY,DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. January Term, 1847 1 THIS case was brought up by a writ of error, issued under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act, from the […]

46 U.S. 382 46 U.S. 382 5 How. 382 12 L.Ed. 199 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.THE BANK OF THE UNITED STATES. January Term, 1847 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and was a continuation of […]

46 U.S. 317 46 U.S. 317 5 How. 317 12 L.Ed. 169 THE PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS, AND COMPANY OF THE COMMERCIALBANK OF CINCINNATI, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.EUNICE BUCKINGHAM’S EXECUTORS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. January Term, 1847 THIS case was brought up, by a writ of error issued under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act, from the Supreme […]

46 U.S. 295 46 U.S. 295 5 How. 295 12 L.Ed. 159 WILLIAM G. COOK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JOHN L. MOFFAT AND JOSEPH CURTIS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. January Term, 1847 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. 2 Cook was […]

46 U.S. 233 46 U.S. 233 5 How. 233 12 L.Ed. 130 WILLIAM TAYLOR, GEORGE TAYLOR, WILLIAM PRIMROSE, ANDELIZA, HIS WIFE, GEORGE PORTER, AND ELSPET, HISWIFE, WILLIAM RAINEY, ALEXANDER RAINEY, AND ELIZABETHRAINEY, COMPLAINANTS AND APPELLANTS,v.VINCENT M. BENHAM, ADMINISTRATOR DE BONIS NON, WITHTHE WILL ANNEXED, OF SAMUEL SAVAGE, DECEASED,RESPONDENT AND APPELLEE.VINCENT M. BENHAM, &C.,v.GEORGE TAYLOR, &C. […]

46 U.S. 278 46 U.S. 278 5 How. 278 12 L.Ed. 152 GEORGE W. PHILLIPS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,v.JOHN S. PRESTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. January Term, 1847 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. 2 It was a claim […]

46 U.S. 29 46 U.S. 29 5 How. 29 12 L.Ed. 36 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,v.GORDON D. BOYD AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS. January Term, 1847 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. It was formerly before the court, […]