Category: 1829

U.S. Supreme Court opinions from 1829.

/U.S. Supreme Court Opinions / 1829 /

WILLIAM CAMPBELL’S EXECUTORS, APPELLANTSv.PRATT, FRANCIS AND OTHERS, APPELLEES.

SUNDRY GOODS, WARES AND MERCHANDISES, THE AMERICAN FURCOMPANY, CLAIMANTS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERRORv.THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

JOHN DANDRIDGE, APPELLANTv.MARTHA WASHINGTON’S EXECUTORS, APPELLEES.

JOHN F. SATTERLEE, PLAINTIFF IN ERRORv.ELIZABETH MATTHEWSON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

JOHN REYNOLDS, TENANT THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFv.DUNCAN MCARTHUR, DEFENDANT.

SOLOMON SOUTHWICK, SPENCER STAFFORD, AND JOHN VAN NESSGATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERRORv.THE POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.

PLOWDEN WESTON AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERRORv.THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHARLESTON, DEFENDANTS.

THE PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS AND COMPANY OF THE BANK OFTHE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTSv.DAVID WEISIGER, APPELLEE.

JOSEPH MANDEVILLE AND OTHERS, APPELLANTSv.ROMULUS RIGGS, APPELLEE.

THE BANK OF HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERRORv.THE LESSEE OF AMBROSE DUDLEY, JUN., DEFENDANT.

THE PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS AND COMPANY OF THE BANK OFTHE UNITED STATESv.WILLIAM OWENS, HERBERT G. WAGGONER, GEORGE WAGLEY ANDALEXANDER MILLER.

THE PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS AND COMPANY OF THE BANK OFTHE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERRORv.THOMAS D. CARNEAL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

DAVID CANTER, APPELLANTv.THE AMERICAN AND OCEAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWYORK, APPELLEE.

JAMES CONOLLY AND OTHERS, APPELLANTSv.RICHARD TAYLOR AND OTHERS, APPELLEES.

CHARLES A. BEATTY AND JOHN T. RITCHIE, APPELLANTSv.DANIEL KURTZ AND OTHERS, TRUSTEES OF THE GERMAN LUTHERANCHURCH OF GEORGETOWN, APPELLEES.

WILLIAM C. GARDNERv.JOHN A. COLLINS ET AL.

WILLIAM S. BUCKNER, A CITIZEN OF NEW YORKv.FINLEY AND VAN LEAR, CITIZENS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND.

ENGLISH, SMITH, MACKALL AND HOFFMAN, APPELLANTSv.CATHARINE FOXALL, APPELLEE.ENGLISH, SMITH, MACKALL, HOFFMAN, M’KENNEY ANDOTHERS, APPELLANTSv.CATHARINE FOXALL, APPELLEE.

ANTHONY TAURIN CHIRAC AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERRORv.GEORGE REINECKER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

DAVID WILKINSON, PLAINTIFF IN ERRORv.THOMAS LELAND AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.