Category: 1823

U.S. Supreme Court opinions from 1823.

/U.S. Supreme Court Opinions / 1823 /

LA NEREYDA.The Spanish Consul, Libellant.

HUNTv.ROUSMANIER’S Administrators.

GOLDSBOROUGH, Plaintiff in Errorv.ORR, Defendant in Error.

SEXTONv.WHEATON and Wife.

THE UNITED STATESv.WILSON.

GREELEY and othersv.The UNITED STATES.

The EXPERIMENT.

SETH SPRING and Sons, Appellants,v.The SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY, GRAY & PINDAR,WILLIAM LINDSAY, and JOHN HASLETT, Respondents.

HUGHESv.THE UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF BALTIMORE.

BUELv.VAN NESS.

NICHOLLS, Plaintiff in Error,v.WEBB, Defendant in Error.

FLECKNER, Plaintiff in Error,v.The PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS, AND COMPANY OF THE BANK OFTHE UNITED STATES, Defendants in Error.

PHILIP NORBORNE NICHOLAS, Attorney General of Virginia,v.RICHARD C. ANDERSON, Surveyor, &c.

The PITT.McNUTT, Claimant.

The MARY ANN.PLUMER, Claimant.

The SARAH.HAZARD, Claimant.

The FRANCES AND ELIZA.COATES, Claimant.

The LUMINARY.L’AMOUREAUX, claimant.

HUGH WALLACE WORMLEY, THOMAS STRODE, RICHARD VEITCH,DAVID CASTLEMAN, and CHARLES M’CORMICK, Appellants,v.MARY WORMLEY, Wife of Hugh Wallace Wormley, by GEORGEF. STROTHER, her next friend, and JOHN S. WORMLEY, MARYW. WORMLEY, JANE B. WORMLEY, and ANNE B. WORMLEY, infantchildren of the said Mary and Hugh Wallace, by the saidSTROTHER, their next friend, Respondents.

THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE GOSPEL INFOREIGN PARTSv.THE TOWN OF NEW-HAVEN, AND WILLIAM WHEELER.