ARIZONA v. UNITED STATES, 567 U.S. 387 (2012)

Issues: Constitutional Law, Preemption, Supremacy Clause

132 S.Ct. 2492 (2012) ARIZONA, et al., Petitioners v. UNITED STATES. No. 11-182.Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 25, 2012.Decided June 25, 2012. Headnotes CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Supremacy Clause. Arizona Statute on Unlawful Aliens — Pre-Emption. Three provisions of an Arizona statute addressing issues related to unlawful immigration are pre-empted, but a fourth — […]

Read More

PLIVA, INC. v. MENSING, 564 U.S. 604 (2011)

Issues: Preemption

?131 S.Ct. 2567 (2011) 564 U.S. 604 180 L.Ed.2d 580 PLIVA, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Gladys MENSING. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Petitioner, v. Gladys Mensing. Actavis, Inc., Petitioner, v. Julie Demahy. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 30, 2011. Decided June 23, 2011. Headnotes PRE-EMPTION — Federal Regulation of Generic Drug Manufacturers — State […]

Read More

COVENTRY HEALTH CARE OF MISSOURI, INC. v. NEVILS, 581 U.S. ____ (2017)

Issues: Federal Employees Health Benefits Act (FEHBA), Preemption

  NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]

Read More

ATT MOBILITY LLC v. CONCEPCION, 09-893 (U.S. 4-27-2011)

Issues: Federal Arbitration Act, Preemption

131 S.Ct. 1740 563 U.S. 333 ATT MOBILITY LLC v. CONCEPCION ET UX. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 09-893. Argued November 9, 2010. Decided April 27, 2011. Headnotes PRE-EMPTION — Federal Arbitration Act — California’s Discover Bank Rule. California’s Discover Bank rule — which permits certain class […]

Read More

Hughes v. Talen Energy Mktg., LLC, 578 U.S. ___ (2016)

Issues: Preemption

NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]

Read More

GADE v. NATIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ASS’N, 505 U.S. 88 (1992)

Issues: Constitutional Law, Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA), Preemption, Supremacy Clause

505 U.S. 88 505 U.S. 88 112 S.Ct. 2374 120 L.Ed.2d 73 Mary GADE, Director, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL SOLID WASTES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION. No. 90-1676. Argued March 23, 1992. Decided June 18, 1992. Syllabus Pursuant to authority contained in the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act or Act), the Occupational Safety […]

Read More