140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. BANK N.A., et al. No. 17-1712.Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 13, 2020.Decided June 1, 2020. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Filings: Petitioners’ Brief Respondents’ Brief […]
INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA. No. 18-1116.Supreme Court of the United States. Argued December 4, 2019.Decided February 26, 2020. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Counsel Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Attorney for Petitioners, Intel […]
140 S.Ct. 592 (2020) 589 U.S. ___ RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE OF IBM, et al., Petitioners v. Larry W. JANDER, et al. No. 18-1165.Supreme Court of United States. January 14, 2020.*593 Counsel Paul D. Clement, Washington, DC, for the petitioners. Jonathan Y. Ellis, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, […]
131 S.Ct. 1866 (2011) 563 U.S. 421 CIGNA CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. Janice C. AMARA et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Supreme Court of United States. No. 09-804. Argued November 30, 2010. Decided May 16, 2011. Headnotes EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974 — Equitable Relief — Violations […]
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See […]
NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v. Detroit […]
?United States Supreme Court AMGEN INC., ET AL. v. STEVE HARRIS, ET AL., (2016) No. 15-278 577 U.S. ___ (2016) 136 S.Ct. 758 (2016) 193 L. Ed. 2d 696 Argued: ????Decided: January 25, 2016 PER CURIAM. The Court considers for the second time the Ninth Circuit’s determination that respondent stockholders’ complaint states a claim against […]