NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary […]
No. 16-1454. 138 S.Ct. 2274 (2018) OHIO, et al., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, et al. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 26, 2018. Decided June 25, 2018. Syllabus Respondent credit-card companies American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company (collectively, Amex) operate what economists call a ?two-sided platform,? providing services to […]
540 U.S. 398 (2004) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO, LLP. No. 02-682.Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 14, 2003.Decided January 13, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Headnotes ANTITRUST. Sherman Act — Sharing Telephone Network. A complaint alleging breach of an incumbent […]
540 U.S. 736 (2004) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE v. FLAMINGO INDUSTRIES (USA) LTD. ET AL. No. 02-1290.Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 1, 2003.Decided February 25, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Headnotes ANTITRUST. Sherman Act — Antitrust Person — Postal Service Status. United States Postal Service […]
333 U.S. 287 333 U.S. 287 68 S.Ct. 550 92 L.Ed. 701 UNITED STATESv.LINE MATERIALS CO. et al. No. 8. Reargued Nov. 12, 13, 1947. Decided March 8, 1948. Mr. Frederick Bernays Wiener, of Providence, R.I., for appellant. Mr. John Lord O’Brian, of Washington, D.C., for appellees. Mr. Albert R. Connelly, of New York City, […]
Syllabus FTC v. ACTAVIS, INC. ( ) 677 F. 3d 1298, reversed and remanded. Syllabus [HTML] [PDF] Opinion, Breyer [HTML] [PDF] Dissent, Roberts [HTML] [PDF] NOTE:?Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of […]