Categories: 1970

New York Feed Co. v. Leary, 397 U.S. 98 (1970)

397 U.S. 98

90 S.Ct. 817

25 L.Ed.2d 78

NEW YORK FEED COMPANY, Inc., et al.
v.
Howard R. LEARY et al.

No. 992.

MILKY WAY PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al.

v.

LEARY et al.

No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 27, 1970

Herald Price Fahringer, for appellants New York Feed Co., and others.

Ralph J. Schwarz, Jr., and Albert B. Gerber, for appellants Milky Way Productions, Inc., and others.

J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchsbaum, for appellee Leary.

Frank S. Hogan, pro se.

Michael R. Juviler, for appellee Hogan.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, pro se.

Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Attorney General of New York.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

2

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 397 U.S. 98

Recent Posts

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT, 152 Eng. Rep. 402 (Ex. 1842).

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…

4 days ago

YU v. POZNIAK-RICE, Cal. App. No. B337415 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

4 months ago

WING INFLATABLES, INC. v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, Cal. App. No. A173263 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

4 months ago

NASRALLAH v. BARR, 590 U.S. 573 (2020)

140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…

7 months ago

THOLE v. U.S. BANK N.A., 590 U.S. 538

140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…

7 months ago

BANISTER v. DAVIS, 590 U.S. 504

140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…

7 months ago