394 U.S. 102
89 S.Ct. 926
22 L.Ed.2d 112
No. 945.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 3, 1969
Counsel:
Burton Marks, for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns, for appellees.
[hr]
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.
WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…
Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…
Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…
140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…
140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…
140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…