366 U.S. 417

366 U.S. 417

81 S.Ct. 1355

6 L.Ed.2d 380

Augustine BALDONADO, petitioner,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Luis Estrada MOYA, petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Elizabeth Ann DUNCAN, petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

Nos. 185-187.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 22, 1961

Mr. A. L. Wirin, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners in all three cases.

Mr. Burt M. Henson, Ventura, Cal., for petitioner in No. 186.

Mr. Arthur Warner, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner in No. 187.

Mr. William E. James, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent in all three cases.

On Writs of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.

PER CURIAM.

1

After hearing oral argument and on due examination of the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances disclosed fails to support the substantial due process issues tendered in the petitions for certiorari, and so we dismiss the writs.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 366 U.S. 417

Recent Posts

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT, 152 Eng. Rep. 402 (Ex. 1842).

WINTERBOTTOM v. WRIGHT In the Exchequer, June 6, 1842. Reported in 10 Meeson & Welsby,…

5 days ago

YU v. POZNIAK-RICE, Cal. App. No. B337415 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

4 months ago

WING INFLATABLES, INC. v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, Cal. App. No. A173263 (July 21, 2025)

Filed 7/21/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

4 months ago

NASRALLAH v. BARR, 590 U.S. 573 (2020)

140 S.Ct. 1683 (2020)590 U.S. 573 Nidal Khalid NASRALLAH, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney…

7 months ago

THOLE v. U.S. BANK N.A., 590 U.S. 538

140 S.Ct. 1615 (2020)590 US 538207 L. Ed. 2d 85 James J. THOLE, et al.,…

7 months ago

BANISTER v. DAVIS, 590 U.S. 504

140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)590 U.S. 504 Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas…

7 months ago